Not being an ideal machine, XZ does have a wow-factor! It just looks so good, me likes the exterior.
Grey1213, 30 Sep 2016I see you're making stuff up again. Why not produce a link that shows it fixes the problems la... moreme, im going to support him because he is my brother and I understand the way he think, broter tan I understand u love u brother.
Egan, man. You had a high definition audio player in your hands (Minimum price $300) and you hardly paid any attention to that fact. Where's your priorities, man?
Grey1213, 03 Oct 2016LOL. Just because they give numbers and use an algorithm it doesn't mean it is objective. The ... moreandroid plice?! lll .. it is one of the bad tech sites in world .. their site is full of gough...
Tann Hauser, 03 Oct 2016Dummy, how exactly is dxomark in any way subjective?
Its a program with algorithms measuring ... moreLOL. Just because they give numbers and use an algorithm it doesn't mean it is objective. The algorithm was created by someone who has to subjectively determine things, and then determine how they want to weight things. It is different from an objective test of how accurate a display is to a certain standard, the standard that most video content follows. In this case dxomark is its own standard, and that is of course not an objective matter.
Here are some more reasons to be sceptical:
Grey1213, 03 Oct 2016How is it objective though? It is still subjective. Unlike testing display colour accuracy. I ... moreDummy, how exactly is dxomark in any way subjective?
Its a program with algorithms measuring points on a scale of 100 for certain camera factors.
Youre waaay too off the field.
[deleted post]How is it objective though? It is still subjective. Unlike testing display colour accuracy. I don't know why you mention dxomark, last time I saw you mention them you were saying the xz got 95. Lol.
Tann Hauser, 03 Oct 2016Wow, at the end of all that "exact measures" babble you mention camera, but denies exact measu... moreThis is the result of MANY of the review sites underrating Sony Xperia's, don't worry,plenty of time I've been roasting Samsung users personally and even iPhone users, my friend meanwhile has an officemates full of iPhone/samsung users but when it comes to photography, they relied on my Friend's Xperia X and Z5
[deleted post]Then there's no point in arguing with you, you're just one of those fanboys or ignorants who doesn't have both devices, come back to me when you own,or have someone lent you both of those devices, you'll see what I'm talking about without even relying on youtube channels or techsites and about the camera, I've provided a link that shows it all
Tann Hauser, 03 Oct 2016Wow, at the end of all that "exact measures" babble you mention camera, but denies exact measu... moreThere's no way to objectively measure a camera, luckily for you. Since you can pretend the camera isn't poor.
[deleted post]Wow, at the end of all that "exact measures" babble you mention camera, but denies exact measures of camera performance.
Double standards much?
Grey1213, 03 Oct 2016What on earth are you talking about? You can change the display mode on Samsung phones to basi... moreSee you always rely on tech sites, it really is oversaturated even in basic mode/normal and the colors are turning much worse as the they,those amoled screens, the whites are inaccurate now and turns into a yellowish tint as like my 2 year old Note 3 and 1 year old Note 5, even compared it to S7 to my Z5 and the lcd of the Z5 is natural, not that I agree that Amoled displays aren't good, what I like about them is the deep black and screen angles.
Gahead, 03 Oct 2016It really is! With its X-reality feature turned on, so what display are you saying accurate? A... moreWhat on earth are you talking about? You can change the display mode on Samsung phones to basic to make them more accurate, the second most accurate on mobile (the iPhone 7 and 7 plus are slightly more accurate). You can't do that on Sony since it is always inaccurate. Almost every site says this, which is backed up by objective measuring, except the ones that just happen to say the camera is good. Lol, wonder why that is?
Grey1213, 03 Oct 2016Silly fanboy. You see, the thing about the display is you can objectively test how accurate it... moreIt really is! With its X-reality feature turned on, so what display are you saying accurate? AMOLED? Their blacks are good but colors? Dude amoleds are oversaturated, I have a Galaxy Note 3 and 5 here you know and my friend has an S7 edge, that's the problem to people like you, you blame manila shaker a Sony fanboy when some praise sony, you're just a IGNORANT,smh
Gahead, 03 Oct 2016It's the Truth, Manila Shaker know how the Sony Xperia's camera should function, his shots wer... moreSilly fanboy. You see, the thing about the display is you can objectively test how accurate it is. And the xperia display is probably the most inaccurate display of 2016, objectively measured. Yet that dopey website says it is accurate, and you say its 'true' too. Know what that means? Both you and that site have no credibility and have no argument to make. Understand? Then go away before you make an even bigger fool of yourself.
Anonymous, 03 Oct 2016So, you can list as many sites that glorify Sony handsets with biased reviews as you wish, mak... moreGsma did a good review, especially on xperias camera part yes.
I can do compares with their rev photos that actually prove Xperias camera is best.
As I did numerous times.
I thank gsma arena for that.