Anonymous, 04 Jan 2017Why waste money on a "flagship" when you do exactly the same things using a "trash"?Agreed..thanks your opinion... But i think there is no huge difference when it's come to the pricing.. why do u buy trash instead of the real deal..?
I might be mistaken, but are you saying in page 2, that the A5 is using pwm to control its brightness while the S7 doesn't use pwm to control its brightness? That would be SO INCORRECT. To the best of my knowledge both phones use pwm to control brightness at least below 50% or so, with a frequency of 240hz approximately. Which makes them both equally possible to eye strain or fatigue sooner than a non pwm controlled brightness screen.
Anonymous, 04 Jan 2017Why waste money on a "flagship" when you do exactly the same things using a "trash"?SD615 Vs SD820.
SD615 really old and super slow, below SD615 sorry to said it is damm slow.
But the new SD430 onward no bad :D
Anonymous, 04 Jan 2017Why waste money on a "flagship" when you do exactly the same things using a "trash"?Well said! lol
Pasca1, 04 Jan 2017While it's nice to pit them against each other to see if it's worth the extra spending, the w0... moreThe design of "flagship" phones are totally irrelevant because users hide them in protective TPU-cases to protect them from accidental, expensive, drops!
Leo.grey, 04 Jan 2017mmm...a trash and flagship. How did you even compare..?Why waste money on a "flagship" when you do exactly the same things using a "trash"?
The only real "advantage" S7 have over A5 is the ability to use VR with a headset, and that is something almost nobody ever use! There is absolutely no point at all to waste too much money on an unnecessary to fast chipset...! A5 can play all the exactly same games... as S7, and the camera is more than good enough for everyone, while not even S7 is good enough for professionals! Waterproofing is pointless because every phone can handle a little rain, and almost nobody use a phone under water!
I hope that a5 2017 will be good not a trash. They are pricey. I am very dissapointed about a5 2016. Samsung premium midrangers are simply too pricey.
While it's nice to pit them against each other to see if it's worth the extra spending, the w0rding of the review makes this pointless.
Yes, you get a lot of features better with the more expensive phone, but at the end of they day it all boils down to if the extra cash is worth it. From what I've seen, I could live with all of the lesser features of A5 perfectly well. This is coming from an a guy who wants to try the A5. Your conclusion and remarks makes it sound like it's the end of the world if I don't go for the S7. I would, if it weren't so f ugly. AAMOF, most Samsung phones have no sense of style whatsoever since the S3. Last pretty phone they had was the S2. RiP. Then they came out with this rounded plastic BS and the hefty price tag.
PS: your spam protection sucks... what's wrong with "w0rding"?
"we think we can live with the design of the Galaxy A5"
Um... OhhhhhKeeeyyy... in case you haven't noticed the trend, the A5 and A3 for that matter are popular because of their beautiful designs. The thing you wrote makes 0 sense. S7 is an ugly phone, be it feature packed. PERIOD.