Reviews - Reader comments

5 megapixel face-off: Vox populi

05 December 2007 | Read the review | Post your comment
5 megapixel face-off: Vox populi - read the full textIt’s been a while since our last cameraphone shootout and you know how much we love them. With all those 5 megapixel cameraphones around, our hands were just itching to make a grand 5 megapixel face-off with as many of the current 5 megapixel cameraphones as possible. The stars in this episode of our Shootout series...

 

yeah you are right my friend. GSM arena are nokia fan thats why they always trye to suport them. SE is better and we can see it so why should i belive smb else when i can prove it. SE RULES

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-01 09:41
  • mD6Y

upto now k750 pics were better than n70, k800 pics was better than n73 and i am doubtful that k850 cannot have better pics than n95 now. it might be that the k850 that gsmarena used is faulty,otherwise this result is incomprehensible!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-01 07:37
  • PSdd

look at c row its in low light

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-31 19:53
  • PT2V

whatever may be the outcome sony k850 is always produced more natural pics than n95

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-31 14:09
  • i4dY

The Finnish have come out ontop again Nokia , the sooner Swedish realise that the better .So much for the se phone!If you could only see the Swedish brag about themselves.

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-31 02:37
  • Sjt4

My dear SE fans.

This is about K850 and not SE in general. We know other SE camera phones capabilities and how good they are as a phone.
But K850 is defenitely NOT the Best 5mp cam around. Live with it. Cheers!

Kal

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-30 18:33
  • 2SU4

GSMarena is not biased ok..
How can they be?
The votes speak for themselves..

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-30 12:53
  • ibfB

if you use a SE first than a nokia its like if you use a windows vista than a linux. SE RULES

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-29 19:42
  • mD6Y

i agree this test is just a trye to send SE down but again SE RULES. They are the best phones

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-29 19:41
  • mD6Y

hmm.. i think this test is plain biased. :)

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-29 14:54
  • wYxg

well they should have added a night photo test as well. all pics are at day time. some night pics whould had showed wat xenon flash are really capable off!

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-28 23:16
  • wucQ

Oh God.. This is funny.. The votes have been counted,yet SE fans STILL insist the k850 is the best.. Jz look at the pics!
Dont be so obssessed with one brand that it clouds ur judgement..
If ur fave brand makes a crappy phone,DEAL WITH IT!
Ugh.. Some ppl r SO weird..

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-26 14:42
  • ibfL

This is pretty surprising, and here's why:

I am researching the US Nokia N95-3 version and I just came to this site from reading this N95-3 review:

http://www.mobiletechreview.co...ia-N95-3.htm

Now, go check that review out and look at the 3 pictures taken with the N95-3 on that page. You can click on each one to get the full, 5 megapixel versions.

They look terrible! Lots of background blurriness, indistinct edges, and so on. The lily pads picture in particular, look at the rocks at the top edge of the picture, you can hardly tell they are rocks! Or the trees in the background of the pool picture, they are all blurry!

Maybe the person who wrote this shootout review here on GSM Arena is simply a better photographer than the person who took the Mobile Tech Review shots, but until I came here I was convinced that the N95-3 camera was crap. Really surprising to see the difference.


i want result now gsmaren aplease display the result

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-26 08:33
  • PT2P

This is pretty surprising, and here's why:

I am researching the US Nokia N95-3 version and I just came to this site from reading this N95-3 review:

http://www.mobiletechreview.co...ia-N95-3.htm

Now, go check that review out and look at the 3 pictures taken with the N95-3 on that page. You can click on each one to get the full, 5 megapixel versions.

They look terrible! Lots of background blurriness, indistinct edges, and so on. The lily pads picture in particular, look at the rocks at the top edge of the picture, you can hardly tell they are rocks! Or the trees in the background of the pool picture, they are all blurry!

Maybe the person who wrote this shootout review here on GSM Arena is simply a better photographer than the person who took the Mobile Tech Review shots, but until I came here I was convinced that the N95-3 camera was crap. Really surprising to see the difference.

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-25 23:06
  • 0cL5

many times SE 1th in last camera phones.one time 3th or 4th.not very important.i am sure SE Work very very better in next cameraphones as always.SE needs your helps for always 1th.help them

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-25 00:27
  • TuKL

i never did like carl zeiss optics thats why i shy away from sony digicam. they produces less natural color, i opted for canon instead

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-24 18:25
  • 2ApS

i want result now

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-24 11:09
  • PT2M

hi,i think samsung g600 is best.
samsung g600>nokia n95
lg ku990> k850
samsung>lg
samsung>sony
---------------------------------> samsung g600

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-22 13:43
  • pX93

It's a surprise to see the cybershot getting the last place...but N95 8gb really did a great job..and credits to G600 as well.

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-21 14:30
  • ibjQ

I'm a SE fan, and I did the blind test.

Overall, I'm really surprised about the quality of Samsung's G600. IMHO is the best, not by far margin over N95 or K850...

Here was my vote posted here many days ago:
(1st, 4 points; 2nd, 3 points... etc)

1- C - A - D - B
2- A - C - D - B
3- A - C - D - B
4- A - C - D - B
5- D - C - A - B
6- C - D - A - B
7- A - C - B - D
8- D - A - B - C


A= 3+4+4+4+2+2+4+3 = 26 --> G600
C= 4+3+3+3+3+4+3+1 = 24 --> N95
D= 2+2+2+2+4+3+1+4 = 20 --> K850
B= 1+1+1+1+1+1+2+2 = 10 --> KU990

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-20 18:16
  • Pum4

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.