Reviews - Reader comments

Nokia 3120 classic review: Mid-range fighter

Nokia 3120 classic review: Mid-range fighter - read the full textEven if every little Nokia wants to be an N95 when it grows up, most of them end up a decent looking gadget with a neat little perk here and there to top the good old calling and texting. Nokia 3120 classic is just another one of them mixed by the time-tested recipe – do the bare minimum but do it right...

 

The review is TOO LONG!This is a budget phone!The review is even longer than windows powered Asus P750, Samsung's new flagship U900 Soul, etc...There are more things to discuss on those phones than this 3120! Now, it's getting clearer that gsmarena is pro-nokia. They praise Nokia's display by exaggerating its outdoor behavior where in fact Samsung displays are far better when it comes to indoor being more sharp & vibrant.There are less people who text under the heat of the sun!

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-27 06:14
  • UD}a

i know this is not supposed to be a high tier handset but why do gsmarena bother reviewing this? Majority of the people knows what to expect in it anyway? and besides, why not review a phone instead that is of interest by many??

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-27 01:59
  • nEuA

ok, there is a mid-end fone, the music cuality is impressive, the camera the same thing, but its a mid-end fone, not a N95!!
god job nokia, but i still love only the smartfones of nokia

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-26 23:29
  • iBtv

Revolutionary? Please...
I don't understand Nokia's point of developing this forgettable phone. It doesn't even look nice...
Nokia just wasted time and effort that could've been used for its other phones.
Like GSMArena said, there are better phones out there than this...

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-26 21:35
  • i}dR

first

revolutionary idea , 3g in a low end device heads off Nokia , Even I fone 3g lacks video calling where a Nokia low end does it .

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-26 20:17
  • w9JU

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.