Reviews - Reader comments

Nokia N90 vs. Sony Ericsson W800: Camera test

09 August 2005 | Read the review | Post your comment
Nokia N90 vs. Sony Ericsson W800: Camera test - read the full textWhich one of the current photo mobiles is the best one? We offer you a direct comparison between pictures taken with the two of the biggest competitors amongst the modern photo mobiles – two megapixel Nokia N90 and Sony Ericsson W800, respectively K750. In addition we have tested the external flash for the new Sony Ericsson.

 

Pages: 1 2

I neither own a w800i or n90.I am having a w850i.After seeing d comparison b/w SE & NOKIA,i would recommend SE for those who consider photography,faster userinterface,battery life & style.

I would recommend nokia for those who can handle complicated user interface and who need wide application support in their fone.
If u do not consider photography and reliability,i would recomend nokia,but blieve me nokia cant even reach near sony ericson in terms of design,camera,music and especially "BATTERY BACKUD"

thanks,
any queries pls mail to master.Nithin@gmail.Com

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-13 11:27
  • k9W{

I've had nokia's n73 for over a year now---and it's been one hellish cellphone year for me. I've put up with it only because I got it free as part of a post paid plan. I will now throw this horrid phone away and go back to my old love, sony ericsson. I agree with Russell--Nokia's Nseries--terrible products.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-17 13:16
  • w0QN

I have tested the Sony Ericsson K750&Nokia N90 under same circumstances.And I have found that the photos by K750 are better than the N90's stills.K750's photo resolution is 1632*1232.Which is probably higher than the N90.K750 have more color in it's pictures and hav print quality.On de other side N90 also have printquality and I must it's a better competitor 4 W800&K750

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-19 16:52
  • kH@G

i know my nokia n90 is better than a k750, odd it didnt come out in this test, but ive seen the quality of my mates, not as good as noks, besides....it has far better video, i can have 2 hours worth of quality vid on my n90

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-11 18:18
  • MSRn

im a proud user of sony ericsson k750i

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-18 17:17
  • upqP

so much for that lens =P
thought Nokia were going 2 be on tops.
lol wonder how my samsung U700 would compare
Obviously to phones in its class =P

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-03 15:45
  • Nxsf

Like duh... SE is better than Nokia, in terms of the sound quality and the picture resolution. I have been a SE fan for so long and SE is trusted and user-friendly. From k508 to w800 to w610 with k810. All of them are great and there is no doubt about it!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-24 04:32
  • PGJN

i think that the nokia N-series are good only by the symbian.and the nokia company had a lot of ******* phones in the market. but SE had the best phones and i think that the best is the (w800i,w810i,k750i.....).oh :i'm saying all this because i have now a SE w800i and i have never seen any phone like it.

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-02 14:37
  • mtHi

hey ppl.. everyone knows that SE is the best its just that ppl wont admit that they'v made a mistake by buying a nokia when they could'v gone for SE (which is pocket friendly and user friendly). and on the issue of durability and fault tolerance.. check out the line outside any nokia care center and u'll get my point... :)

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-11 17:07
  • w0Wx

Nowadays Only N95 can beat sony ericsson in the case of imaging because of 5mp camera.In the case of2mp,sony ericsson is the best,no one can beat it.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-09 19:49
  • kH@$

According to my opinion,SE is the best quality in picture and in sounds.the sound quality of walkman series of SE is amazing.Nokia has no sound quality than j310i which is cheaper in the series of sony ericsson.SONY ERICSSON IS THE BEST,NO DOUBT.

  • Reply
  • 2007-06-09 19:14
  • kH@$

Hey man...
i kno SE is gud bt it somes no way near Nokia N series...
its a symbian OS..wherez SE is java....
i jus think u r tryin to disrespect nokia man..tats nt fair...let me take da pics....n i'll shw ya wats da diffrence buddy cuz i use a Nokia N90..
......b fair

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-16 00:50
  • P@UD

Dudes SE comes nowhere nearer to Nokia when it comes to N- Series phones.They are way better than SE in every aspect.I personally feel that because SE is cheaper people like to stick around with it.
Go get yourself a N73 or something and feel what is sound and imaging.....
Nokia sets standards........others follow it.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-20 09:02
  • P$tF

I used Nokia CDMA right now and realized that their cost of Sales after service is HIGHER than other manufacturers, even for its casing, battery and other peripheral or spare parts. That's the reason why I would never buy any nokias. enough with my cdma phone. that's it!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-18 06:38
  • UDN6

nice but why not try sony ericsson k800i vs N90 to see a real diferences

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-12 14:52
  • mYcH

I used both N90 and W800i.What i observed is 800i is better than N 90 in sound as well as images and the pic quality is excellent when compared to N Series.While the cost of Nokia is very high and we'll get many software problems and we wont have all these when sony erricson is considered

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-25 20:44
  • PEm}

I've been using SE W700i since last 1 month and believe no other phone in the market can beat it in sound quality and when u compare the camera, 1.3 mp camera of SE is at par with 2 mp camera of any nokia phone.
The processing speed of phone is amazing. you never get messages such as retrieving data, etc....
I belive Nokia's software is just user friendly which is made for dumb people who find it hard to browse thru a bit complicated softwares.
But I believe tht in this high tech world, one is supposed to know all this and its not too complicated either.
So the conclusion is that Nokia is for dumb people and SE is for people who think beyond....

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-12 11:34
  • MHxt

ive have a sony ericson K750i the phone has been driven over with a 4x4 had a cracked lcd but no other physical Damage to the pc board or to the casing itself , same handset was left over night in the rain,A thunder storm, with a silicone skin cover. had no water damage what so ever Ive dropped the handset a number of times no problems no Freezing,, no software application failures, No Virus's no waiting 45 sec 4 your phone to start up nothing like the nokia

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 16:07
  • Nhd{

i would think than n90 camara quality is goog

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-27 05:03
  • w9LK

sony is good in terms of price , sound , picture quality. but if you are intrested to use your phone for a longer period (more than one year) shuld go for a much durabile product like nokia. video is much better , battery is great, no service requierd(generally) no need to use warrenty , the extra penny (price) is wroth for nokia n 90 in comparisin with buying a sony product.
in fact i shifted from sony to nokia and will never go back to sony again.

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-15 17:59
  • ijg1
Pages: 1 2

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.