Reviews - Reader comments

Fashion phones overview: Man’s best friend

01 September 2010 | Read the review | Post your comment
Fashion phones overview: Man’s best friend - read the full textGadgets have become so important they're a part of how people look at you. A phone can tell a lot about who you are. Fashion phones… well… let's say they leave little to the imagination. There are handsets that make an impression...

 

Sort by:

Samsung M7500 Emporio Armani is "THE BEST".... i love it...

  • Reply
  • 2011-09-13 14:14
  • yHx9

mobiano...
WOOOOOOOW!!!!!!!!
i cant believe the design of that one its so unique and it fit the logo at the bottom WOW

  • Reply
  • 2010-10-14 10:31
  • vxt3

I cannot believe that the Micromax "Bling" never made it onto the article either !

Check it out here ...
http://www.gsmarena.com/microm...ing-3312.php

  • Reply
  • 2010-10-10 20:14
  • tUqS

Too bad the people at GoldVish are a bunch of Criminals. It's the only brand on this list that does not deserve to be here.

  • Reply
  • 2010-10-05 16:28
  • mbyw

sylish Bellperre phones were also not in the article. Maybe write new article...

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-29 21:15
  • nBe4

Siemens Xelibri ?

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-14 00:53
  • KxbL

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-09-04 10:22 from qQr8 - click to readMaybe in the States, yes. In my country the unlocked one would be around $1100 (the only phone more expensive than that being maybe Motorola Aura at $1350) and it's mostly bought as a status symbol or girls get it from rich boyfriends, people like that, and mostly they can't even use the few functions it has (without the apps) properly. With the contract it's somewhat cheaper but still not enough to justify the price over similar phones by other brands. And also, GSMArena is European and probably writes from a similar point of view. So, over here, it's a fashion phone alright.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-13 03:21
  • Mtrf

> In reply to Jon SWE @ 2010-09-03 07:37 from mhBf - click to readUlysse Nardin Chairman? Give me a break. That is not a smart phone.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-12 22:58
  • k1aG

> In reply to SOSmonster @ 2010-09-07 07:48 from Iaah - click to readyeah.. That right buddy. Iphone is no longer a fashion phone these day. And it too far away To be called a luxury phone since Everyone can have it if they want to. Im not an iphone hater (i have iphone 3gs) but in this arena, Iphone is out of the league..

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-09 20:37
  • PS6v

> In reply to Galib @ 2010-09-09 04:49 from 9xE4 - click to readYou're definitely right!! ^_^

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-09 15:42
  • t7Xi

It should be covered for all types of fashion phone. Only 60 percent of the world's fashion phone has been covered. But nice try. Try to post another review with the whole fashion phone industry.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-09 04:49
  • 9xE4

So many designer handsets you missed in his article, yet you dedicate a page to the iPhone? There's nothing luxurious or exclusive about a phone that every man and their dog has.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-07 07:48
  • Iaah

the list is missing the Motorola razr d&g edition..

and the versace phone is probably too feminine, if that belongs to this list, so does the dior phone

otherwise fun article

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-06 03:01
  • P%Xy

they forgot the Ulysse Nardin Chairman which is a luxury phone with android and touchscreen! excelent phone!


  • Reply
  • 2010-09-05 23:01
  • 0V7a

This article missed the T68
Their was a version made with real gold and lots of diamonds. Its was created in Antwerp (Flanders).

http://www.luxurycellphones.or...ck-diamonds/

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-05 22:17
  • 05w5

Do these diamonds or African blackwood help the iPhone 4 to be able recieve a simple phonecall or not?

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-05 22:14
  • p8c4

> In reply to hmmmhmmm @ 2010-09-03 20:25 from 3nq1 - click to readEven I was expecting to see the Chairman in the last page.. but I got an iPhone instead.. shame.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-04 18:17
  • t}HE

I'm fashion consious and I love all things which belong to fashion....

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-04 14:24
  • Mfx{

Why is the iPhone in this list? At least in the US, its about the same price as any other smartphone on contract, and off contract its only about $100-200 more at the most. It's also designed for the masses and not meant for only rich movie stars, since its ubiquitous and can be found in the hands of struggling college students, suburban moms, construction workers, etc. I don't know how the pricing for the iPhone is like in Europe, but I highly doubt it even remotely falls into the league of the other gaudy bestudded sky-high priced phones you list on previous pages. Claiming that it has gold and blackwood versions is also hypocritical, as many phones from Nokia and Samsung also have fancier versions. The iPhone also isn't anymore a fashion phone than your average Samsung Galaxy S or Nokia N97, nor priced that much further up. It's the Apple reputation that precedes the phone, something other manufacturers can only dream of. And no I've never owned an Apple product and my current phone is a Samsung Wave because no one has it in the US and is definitely more "unique" in my part of the world than the omnipresent iPhone.

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-04 10:22
  • qQr8

I think fashion phone is IPhone correctly but
Nice design are sony Ericsson ^^

  • Reply
  • 2010-09-04 07:46
  • tSu4

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.