Reviews - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 I8160 preview: First look

24 April 2012 | Read the review | Post your comment
Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 I8160 preview: First look - read the full textThe original Samsung Galaxy Ace is now an entry level device at best, pushed down the ranks by the weight of two sequels. The Galaxy Ace 2 is next in line and we're talking a proper mid-range device. This dual-core smartphone...

 

Sort by:

Note 2 Galaxy, Super AMOLED 5.5 inches and released in October? http://technologyset.com/note-...-in-october/

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-06 01:35
  • 04U8

which one is better samsung galaxy ace plus or ace2??

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-05 07:59
  • PAXp

i want ics no gingerbread.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-04 23:44
  • XMF9

samsung galaxy ace 2 or sony xperia u or sony xperia sola

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-31 19:35
  • iEP6

Please tell if Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 I8160 can make
1) 3g native video call and
2) as well as video chat like Skype and all.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-18 16:25
  • Hkqj

correction (page 3 of review):
>>so the lower ___single-core___ performance (the CPU is clocked at 800MHz) doesn't seem to be a problem.

First page said: "800MHz ___dual-core___ processor".

BTW, what kind of CPU is there? IDK any dual-core CPUs which has been clocked at 800 MHz.
Probably there is downclocked NovaThor U8500 cpu. It's dual-core, equiped with Mali400MP gpu, and already used by Samsung in GT-i8530 Galaxy Beam.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-13 07:50
  • SnwN

When will this phone be released in India???

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-09 19:01
  • vGVR

I want to aske about facebook apple

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-09 01:06
  • J8ZM

Must be an under-clocked ST-Ericsson NovaThor chip. Good chance it can be overclocked to ~1.2GHz.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 17:51
  • TkQ3

> In reply to molotofc @ 2012-04-25 12:30 from M5N% - click to readhaha, then you will only have 200 phones to select from. Well done Samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-27 15:16
  • vxKC

> In reply to lethalforce @ 2012-04-26 09:28 from tUn2 - click to readI would say the Ace 2 is better because the W got bad reviews about the quality of it's display.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-27 15:15
  • vxKC

> In reply to eka @ 2012-04-27 04:15 from uE54 - click to readand did I miss that being discussed in the review? Maybe?

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-27 15:13
  • vxKC

> In reply to Izzy @ 2012-04-27 06:54 from Ianq - click to readYes it's is a shame that the review seemed obsessed with comparing it with the original Ace because um, er ,hmm .... because it had a similar name.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-27 15:11
  • vxKC

I'd be very interested to know how this compares to the Galaxy W, especially the 800mHz dual core vs. the 1.4GHz single core. Storage and RAM could be the deal-breaker for me though (and could spell the difference in performance).

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-27 06:54
  • Ianq

2012 phone with no ICS.
seems that Samsung love to Samsunged their buyers :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-27 04:15
  • uE54

Does it have gorilla glass or not?
It is a very important issue.
Who knows for sure?

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 14:51
  • d@6%

i have dutched Samsung Galaxy for one reason, "Touchwiz" i dont like it at all after using it for a while and comparing to others like HTC & Sony... Samsung not doing good in this department

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:37
  • nTpT

between samsung galaxy W and galaxy ace 2...which 1 is better....??

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 09:28
  • tUn2

There used to be a time when samsung mobiles used to be famous for their looks. Gone are those days. Hardy sets no doubt about that. But looks are so boring. And processor why 800 why not 1 GHz. Bit of a game spoiler. Otherwise great.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-25 18:30
  • bJgS

Try type in the word 'galaxy' in the phone search above

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-25 12:30
  • M5N%
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.