Reviews - Reader comments

Nokia Asha 302 review: E-serious

Nokia Asha 302 review: E-serious - read the full textThe Nokia Asha 302 comes between the Asha 300 and the Asha 303 in Nokia's updated featurephone lineup, but it doesn't quite follow the numerical order. Although obviously not a smartphone, this S40 messenger is almost halfway there. It aims...


Sort by:

Nokia 302 better? Yes/no

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-26 19:31
  • rA{%

Its a very good stylish phone very speed internet supports mp4 avi its super

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 08:55
  • bJed

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-16 17:39 from dMAn - click to readIts a gud phone not touch nice speed good appearance

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 08:50
  • bJed

phones4u r sellin these in uk at £79.95 , im thinkin about gettin 1 cos my samsung galaxy europa isnt that gud even tho its an android pone , only down side is phones4u dont do deal on psyg upgrade on 3 network , theyve said if a m8 has a payg on diff network I can then get £15 off n still use my 3 sim in asha cos its 3g

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-11 19:47
  • 39x{

Nice phone but name is not nice.
. I don't know y Nokia had selling with low price.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-11 14:24
  • 7tKe

There is no flashlight for the phone. Please do something

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-04 19:24
  • IWds

i think its not bad will give it a try

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-21 21:55
  • 0wqU

Too good

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-19 16:33
  • U@ab

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-16 17:39 from dMAn - click to readit is not touch

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 23:24
  • nyZ1

I seldom buy Nokia but I always admire their user-friendly features and all.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 10:18
  • 9x4P

Is it touch???or no???

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 17:39
  • dMAn

> In reply to Dr.U @ 2012-05-11 17:18 from PSdf - click to readThis phone has a Document viewer. You can download it from the store. try it!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 09:23
  • 9G7H

> In reply to Bakou @ 2012-05-15 12:08 from 9x9g - click to readWhy do you assume that $150-$200 is not serious amount of money? i live in rich country but i think carefully before spending this amount of money or even less than that, people in other countries have cheap access to the net, thanks for internet cafes, those people read these reviews and wait for them because $150 is really a lot of money for them.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 23:16
  • 3xJ2

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-14 14:38 from 3xJ2 - click to readIf u spend your money for budget phone up to 150-200$ you wont waste 2 month to read reviews about Coz at that price range all phones nearly same. A review is needed when you gonna spend serious amount of money.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 12:08
  • 9x9g

Great review, although I don't see the need to upgrade from my C3. 1½ years after purchase, my biggest gripe is how easily the screen gets scratched up. Has that been rectified on the Asha phones?

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 02:09
  • jHSj

> In reply to Bakou @ 2012-05-14 09:03 from 9x9g - click to readThat is your opinion, other people like me want to read about Asha phones or other low-end phones, i really don't care about any smartphones, Nokia 808 is the only one that i care about and that's because of the camera and nothing else.

People have different needs and prefer different type of phones, I think GSMarena doing a good job reviewing all kind of phones, and i hope they don't stop reviewing low-end phones.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-14 14:38
  • 3xJ2

ARENA crew plz stop reviewing and wasting time for such crappy budget phones. You have not reviewed such phones like dell venue,acer iconia smart etc.But spend time to review different kinds of Asha. Of course it's not my job u decide what to review but as permament user of GSMARENA i'd like to share my opinion.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-14 09:03
  • 9x9g

Its not a powerhouse, thats ok.

To me, this is what phones should look like. If you could fit the SGS2 dual core and 512mb ram in this phone, that would be awesome.

Reason I say this, is because I think this is the best kind of form factor for a phone. So sleek and stylish, compact and portable.. I miss this for a phone.. all the new phones have to try so hard to be sexy- cause they are waaay too big.

To me I loved the E6, and it was almost there, just needed a better app store - but man 4 days battery!! Unbelievable.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-13 10:03
  • 7see

This would've been a great phone 2 years ago. Sadly the price of android entry phones dropping every month make this phone a non competitior.

But I love its design and it beats the E71 camera

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-13 09:35
  • IxaP

wrong info, this doesn't come with 2GB inbox.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-12 11:49
  • vIg@

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.