Reviews - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy S III mini preview: First look

11 October 2012 | Read the review | Post your comment
Samsung Galaxy S III mini preview: First look - read the full textThe Samsung Galaxy S III is one beast of a smartphone, but for many it is still too much to handle. A strong point can be made that a large screen is necessary for proper enjoyment of media on the go or great browsing experience, but not everyone is willing to put a with the body that...


Sort by:

> In reply to ab @ 2012-10-11 21:55 from fCNe - click to readi hope you know what you are sayng my friend

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-12 04:58
  • sBSu

> In reply to ab @ 2012-10-11 21:55 from fCNe - click to readwake up boy . Even xperia is in the game . Samsung always sucked in low end phones and just gave priority to high end phones . Even s advance did not get ics upDate , which costed few bucks lesser than s2 . But sony with its new phones , miro , tipo have android 4.0.4 preinstalled where as there is update for xperia sola

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-12 03:32
  • U@%j

Mini? A device with a 4" screen is still quite sizable...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-12 03:05
  • xZEc

revamped galaxy s advance. Too bad!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-12 01:37
  • P%uR

First look & Last look

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-12 01:14
  • 0wgx

It looks like galaxy duos ..

I have s2 and duos . I donnot feel like to buy this phone and i will wait for galaxy s4

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-12 00:14
  • JF5C

First look & Last look

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 23:45
  • 0wgx

> In reply to ab @ 2012-10-11 21:55 from fCNe - click to readSony is a joke ei? you are a big fool...I am using xperia sola and it is much better than this phone hardare wise and spec wise...I know samsung make awesome phones but not this one..Its wrong to insult sony because sony makes great inovation just like samsung...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 23:38
  • v0Xx

It shouldn't be called a Galaxy S3 mini , it should be the Galaxy S2 mini cuz it is less powerful than the S2 , the NovaThor chipset is the least powerful dual-core chipset around , I think Samsung is using the S3 name for advertisememt , this device is useless ,,,

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 23:36
  • 6vQF

Meh...sticking to S+ until the 350 PPI OLED comes out.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 23:30
  • MNTt

software wise you can use this baby like s3 but can it handle the software smoothly by using this kind of hardware parts? not impressed =(

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 22:20
  • t7Ra

400 Euros for this?! Sony Xperia P is much better and cheaper than this!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 22:02
  • 0C9k

Wow this is much better than Sony xperia t.. Way to go Samsung... Sony please stop making phones because nobody cares about your flop xperia series.. Nothing can beat Samsung now.. They are very big and nobody can stop them.. Sony is a joke now.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 21:55
  • fCNe

Don't buy this, buy Galaxy S Advance, almost same spec and much cheaper.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:50
  • KiVZ

GsmArena,are you promised to not show this phone until it goes official,
Responsible Journalism

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:31
  • uu$a

> In reply to BlameItOnThem @ 2012-10-11 19:12 from sRjx - click to readLol mr troll, this is real unlimited smooth open android cheap smartphone which all people should know that is below 18k ! Anyday samsung and android is better, bestcone rally, now android and samsung battries are perfect in battery life and nobody can think to beat droids m

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:27
  • MDVw

> In reply to chickadee @ 2012-10-11 19:16 from IVJV - click to readWhat, , this is a midrange cheap powerful one, one of the best smooth jellybean powrrful cheap packages!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:24
  • MDVw

if the price is below 18k, then its ok
otherwise it is a flop show by samsung

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:23
  • uu7X

I'll get it if price between 10k to 12k but if price is more than 12k then i'll prefer to get samsung galaxy s1 or samsung galaxy s duos.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:16
  • v{Mn

Fail for Samsung. Looks like they've forgot to publish this phone back in 2010 and just a week ago they've remembered.
Poor spec, high price. If it would have same what S3 has, it would be worth buying.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:06
  • 0FV3

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.