Reviews - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy S III mini preview: First look

11 October 2012 | Read the review | Post your comment
Samsung Galaxy S III mini preview: First look - read the full textThe Samsung Galaxy S III is one beast of a smartphone, but for many it is still too much to handle. A strong point can be made that a large screen is necessary for proper enjoyment of media on the go or great browsing experience, but not everyone is willing to put a with the body that...

 

Sort by:

It shouldn't be called a Galaxy S3 mini , it should be the Galaxy S2 mini cuz it is less powerful than the S2 , the NovaThor chipset is the least powerful dual-core chipset around , I think Samsung is using the S3 name for advertisememt , this device is useless ,,,

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 23:36
  • 6vQF

Meh...sticking to S+ until the 350 PPI OLED comes out.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 23:30
  • MNTt

software wise you can use this baby like s3 but can it handle the software smoothly by using this kind of hardware parts? not impressed =(

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 22:20
  • t7Ra

400 Euros for this?! Sony Xperia P is much better and cheaper than this!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 22:02
  • 0C9k

Wow this is much better than Sony xperia t.. Way to go Samsung... Sony please stop making phones because nobody cares about your flop xperia series.. Nothing can beat Samsung now.. They are very big and nobody can stop them.. Sony is a joke now.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 21:55
  • fCNe

Don't buy this, buy Galaxy S Advance, almost same spec and much cheaper.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:50
  • KiVZ

GsmArena,are you promised to not show this phone until it goes official,
Hatsoff,
Responsible Journalism
Good.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:31
  • uu$a

> In reply to BlameItOnThem @ 2012-10-11 19:12 from sRjx - click to readLol mr troll, this is real unlimited smooth open android cheap smartphone which all people should know that is below 18k ! Anyday samsung and android is better, bestcone rally, now android and samsung battries are perfect in battery life and nobody can think to beat droids m

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:27
  • MDVw

> In reply to chickadee @ 2012-10-11 19:16 from IVJV - click to readWhat, , this is a midrange cheap powerful one, one of the best smooth jellybean powrrful cheap packages!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:24
  • MDVw

if the price is below 18k, then its ok
otherwise it is a flop show by samsung

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:23
  • uu7X

I'll get it if price between 10k to 12k but if price is more than 12k then i'll prefer to get samsung galaxy s1 or samsung galaxy s duos.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:16
  • v{Mn

Fail for Samsung. Looks like they've forgot to publish this phone back in 2010 and just a week ago they've remembered.
Poor spec, high price. If it would have same what S3 has, it would be worth buying.
Sad...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:06
  • 0FV3

This is pointless

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:02
  • NsiW

greedy sammy

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:44
  • vbGK

galaxy s2 can eat this for breakfast.... samsung what r u doing? samsung stahp...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:16
  • IVJV

Samsung is acting greedy here...milking out $$ by using the GS III naming where its not even halfway near to Gs III..dats a shame and yeah it looks waaaay more ugly in that 4'' chasis honestly there r better looking nd feature rich handset in this segement.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:15
  • NFaF

The only thing that I don't like of GS3 is its design.
The best part of this GS3mini is its design, and that explains well how much I like this phone. Lol

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:13
  • H8r@

Specs wise, L820 is better than this. Downgraded specs, shitty built, battery hog, hoardeder of cores and poor camera. Lumia any day!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:12
  • sRjx

Lols wrong decision on naming.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:05
  • 3sE3

I love it. If I got money, I'll buy this phone... :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:04
  • tug%
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.