Reviews - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom preview: First look

Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom preview: First look - read the full textJust taking the photo won't do these days - you'll want to edit and share it, then rake in the likes. Except most cameras pretty much bail out at the snapshot. Not the Samsung Galaxy S4 zoom though, a hybrid of a point-and-shoot with...

 

Sort by:

Nokia 808 and EOS look like toys infront S4 Zoom.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-13 11:11
  • JxSk

Please... can you check maximum exposure time ? ISO seems to be 3200

Btw... SPHERE photos: you do realize that IN THEORY you can take gigapixel SPHERE photo if you use zooom... i guess this is just my dream but worth of trying out...

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-13 11:11
  • T4WH

Is there someone who will really buy "this" ? hahahahahhaha SO UGLY.
Soon if Nikon/Canon put android in SLR, we will have new category of cameraphones or something like that, hahahha....

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-13 11:04
  • 0mIy

Waiting for Samsung Galaxy S5 DSLR, with full high end specs.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-13 05:30
  • khM7

> In reply to Gelvin @ 2013-06-12 16:18 from sSP0 - click to readAnd people say the Nokia 808 and (rumoured) EOS have camera humps..???

http://www.allaboutsymbian.com...ia_808_a.php

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-13 04:27
  • iwtW

Hybrid e? Hahaha funny.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-13 01:22
  • X3tk

Would rather go with either Sony Honami, or Nokia EOS than this one.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-13 00:41
  • TbBx

For a photo maniac like me, first impression was:
Ok, Not so bad in terms of mobility and bulkiness, if it has nice image Quality.

But it hasn't! Looking for a long time the photo samples and the photo/video comparison tools, I see much of lens problems, as well as jpeg algorithm problems. 150 Euro slimmer cameras do it better.
The concept seem like a twin to the galaxy camera, but the latter has nicer iq with better contrast and details in the photo files. S4 Zoom images are so "mushy" and it's getting worst in low light photo/video frames.
If they've only put the (allround good enough for casual/street photography) S4 sensor in the zoom, then things could be adequate for an imaging phone. And I really may have bought it!!!

Another way for Samsung to go, could be:
A fast 4X zoom lens (slimmer of phone too!)
The original S4 photo sensor
Better jpeg algorithm
Raw capability
Dual core, 2 gb ram is ok
Tripod screw on the bottom.
For 400usd / 350 euros retail price, would be a hit!

I'm a user of N8 and 808 (and low end android phones), but as you can see, I'm not obsessed with anything than image quality.
There's no perfect phone, not even a perfect camera. The specs, the target group and the prices are so decided, from the marketing dept of the manufacturers...

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 23:12
  • gCw$

ugly cheap looking phone! without android samsung galaxy line wont sell!!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 22:31
  • 4IGh

one f the ugliest lukin phon or camera..whatever it is. Its weired as hell. Nokia 808 p.v was million times better then this ....shame on sammy for introducing such an old time camera + phone. This seriously is uglier then cheap chinese phones. Dont know how somebdy can use it as a phone. I will definatly wait for nokia lumia eos at any cost......

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 21:02
  • rJBJ

And despite having optical zoom, the 808 will put more details in the images. Thanks to this ugly device, the 808 looks slimmer. haha

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 19:41
  • PPgT

> In reply to p vuth @ 2013-06-12 16:18 from XNvd - click to readyes lumix is waayyyy better in picture quality we have one too

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 19:19
  • j2LS

> In reply to [deleted post]Please read first before dropping comments and whining. It's a preview (refer to the title) or only a first peek, quick skim of the product.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 19:05
  • thee

You sound pathetic and desperate dont buy it its easy..

I am buying one a real half press shutter at last.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 18:41
  • TkE5

This is an abomination! (design-wise, i mean)

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 17:49
  • qM8N

I think it will be better to carry a smartphone and a digital camera instead of buying this ph. So UGLY to be a smartphone. Complete NIGHTMARE!

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 17:41
  • PSce

What a bad Image Quality this has!

Sammy should have taken the good S4 sensor and combined it with optical stabilization and zoom, perhaps only 4 or 5 times zoom. 10 times is an absolute overkill.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 16:55
  • Js4I

I can't understand: the photo quality IS the target of this toy, and it can't catch up the S4 quality?
Samsung, are you kidding?

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 16:55
  • 0P{G

I find it strange that the normal S4 has an amazing camera quality with beautiful colors and great sharpness while this S4 Zoom has a worse image quality than my S1. I am quite sure that this is not a finalized software, it can't be, why would they release a device with that camera with an ugly image quality? Also, I wish they chose the Adreno 320 instead of mali 400 GPU, bad choice for an S4 variant! Speed is fine (though I wish it was 1.7 per core) and RAM is great, I hope Samsung fixes the camera quality before release date or they will embarrass their name. Waiting for final review for the final product from GSMArena and other sources.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 16:37
  • PHMT

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-06-12 15:28 from x8fZ - click to readYes, even s4 is bigger and thicker than advertised.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-12 16:33
  • v0qJ

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.