8 megapixel mega shootout: Picture this
Nokia 700 review: Agent seven double-ohBenQ A520 - user opinions and reviews
- Lucas
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Z @ 2005-01-29 19:35 from jf9B - click to readHow do your other stuff,in your hands fo cause
- Reply
- 2009-08-19 16:14
- N9Ak
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Is this a phone oe a pillow...A PHONE well it doesnt look like it
- Reply
- 2006-11-13 21:53
- my5c
- U
- a frustrated woman!
- Report
- 0
why people think that a phone without features is for women??? i love features and i'm a woman.
- Reply
- 2006-01-29 19:55
- mt86
- U
- salim
- Report
- 0
in my opinion this model is only for women,the desing is ok but features no.
the price can not be up then 30 $
- Reply
- 2006-01-16 15:31
- MZb%
- U
- Foxy
- Report
- 0
Just by looking at the pic, i cant c the buttons and m a txter so that 4 me, is a hassle. but otherwise the phone seems stylish and sexy proly not for men.....
- Reply
- 2005-11-24 03:44
- U2Kg
- U
- Ferni
- Report
- 0
All those that say that itīs for woman are wrong!Itīs really cute!!!!!The cam is very good,the itīs no so expencive so I recomend it. ITĻS really a very atractive phone!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2005-10-20 23:24
- PcmL
- U
- KELS
- Report
- 0
definately 4 women!
sorry blokes!
Its a very atractive fone but to be honest the only good thing about it is the fact its got a camera!
it hasnt got infrared or bluetooth or mp3 or anything soryy but i wouldnt buy it yet every1 is entitled to there own opinion!
- Reply
- 2005-08-27 22:12
- Rtsi
- U
- Em
- Report
- 0
Pics are brill have got the one down from this phone and have am upgrading to this one you can get them for under Ģ150 p&P of ebay i would recomend the phone before nokia buys the design as is planned 2!!!!
- Reply
- 2005-06-18 23:31
- mXF7
- U
- Ann
- Report
- 0
em..i was wandering about the camera, is the pics taken from this phone good quality like samsung or is it really bad.
- Reply
- 2005-06-06 21:17
- i0Wf
- U
- MFH
- Report
- 0
Classy.. very classy... but totally great for stylish women and executive men.
- Reply
- 2005-02-13 15:09
- TST8
- U
