Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.3
- Features
-
6.0
- Performance
-
6.0
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
after replacing the battery twice and the phone once; the phone charge last about only 2 days with minimal use.
- Reply
- 2010-09-30 18:49
- 0fGx
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
hey...its a grate phone...I'm using it for last two weeks.....the special item is Tv........
- Reply
- 2009-05-12 19:38
- w9JL
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Well personally I think it is a great phone. No it is no iPhone or LG Vu but it is sleek and sophisticated looking. It works well and it does have great features.
- Reply
- 2009-01-03 01:53
- j@uW
- U
- TEXAS
- Report
- 0
well one good point is the reasonable weight not that heavy ONLY 81g. not bad at all.
- Reply
- 2008-11-09 22:33
- bgE%
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
if it's got a mid-low price tag might be worth thinking about
- Reply
- 2008-09-04 11:50
- v0gj
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to LG @ 2008-09-01 18:36 from pW5S - click to readu must be a nokia fan because u cant see past your own nose lol
this is a crap phone but go look at the KC91 going to be the best phone of the year that or the innov8 atleast!!
- Reply
- 2008-09-03 16:09
- Mx@E
- R
- VUologist
- Report
- 0
Lg should stick to producing more Lg Vu's. The Vu was hot this is not. Create more Vu's!!!
- Reply
- 2008-09-02 23:26
- j3c8
- U
- homie
- Report
- 0
hahha.. a cheap n ugly phone exclusively for AT&T customers
- Reply
- 2008-09-02 06:51
- P$@h
- U

