Motorola Aura - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
7.4
- Performance
-
7.6
- phone
- Report
> In reply to Daniel @ 2009-10-02 21:59 from 3c1nAura is great phone!!!as i told you the bleade is not in center.and that is damaged your plastic part of phone.
- Reply
- 2009-10-03 14:33
- 0xcE
- R
- Daniel
- Report
It's quite a difference between "don't think" and actually having the phone in the hand. As I told you before both glasses are crystal sapphire. I am using it for 8 months. The only damage it suffered is the one in the photos.
- Reply
- 2009-10-02 21:59
- 3c1n
- U
- Phone
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-01 00:50 from 3c1HI dont think thats is the seame glaas like front,and antena cover is plastic,and i think the rear glas is plastic.please answer somewone!schratch on your phone is bicouse your bleade open display is not in center,i seleng original aura phone on black market from about 10 models 1 have bad hausin center.sory for my bad englase.please put 2 pictures of your phone when batery is out left plastic side and rear captured from behinde.please!and thank you.
- Reply
- 2009-10-02 00:25
- SH{T
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
this is realyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssst
luxury phone at wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooorld
- Reply
- 2009-10-01 14:24
- Mfxm
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
The rear cover the one where you can see the cogs is of crystal sapphire not scratch-able the same as the front screen glass. The only plastic part I think is the one that got damaged in the photos I mentioned in the previous comment.
- Reply
- 2009-10-01 00:50
- 3c1H
- R
- Daniel Terci
- Report
See how it gets after 8 months of use :(
http://img5.imageshack.us/img5...p9281143.jpg
http://img269.imageshack.us/im...p9281144.jpg
http://img17.imageshack.us/img...p9281145.jpg
http://img34.imageshack.us/img...p9281147.jpg
- Reply
- 2009-09-30 15:50
- 3c1H
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
how nice. 7yrs later they release the upgrade version of the v70.
fugly.
- Reply
- 2009-09-22 09:05
- IaHM
- U
- SymbianKing
- Report
this phone is for nuts cant believe? :D
Symbian Rulezzzz!!
- Reply
- 2009-09-17 00:50
- RBAN
- U
- yashu
- Report
i don't think motorols is such a useless one try my model moto rokr e8 yeah it is very good u csn reply me if u csnnot fing sny festures in mine......................
- Reply
- 2009-09-11 22:30
- PAYh
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
aura is realy BEAUTIFUL
im realy on WONDER why design vote 8.2 ???!!!!!
design is #10 from 10
- Reply
- 2009-09-10 15:46
- Sbg{
- C
- frajeru
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-23 07:07 from ibbxyou have right, this is a very ugly phone, for a very expensive price!The tecnical featuring is a middle suite.Y nto found nothig famuos in this phone!
- Reply
- 2009-08-27 19:57
- pk%4
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to david13 @ 2009-08-20 18:29 from M3s@If Motorola go back to the drawing board and come up with similar designs, likes of Nokia, Samsungs and Sony Erricson etc., then that's not Motorola anymore!?
Motorola phones are unique
- Reply
- 2009-08-25 00:45
- UisK
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
One word. Ugly. It's been getting terrible reviews from all over. On the design front, not everyone thinks it looks stunning, in fact most people who have spoken of it think its ugly. It has virtually zero features compared to other phones available in the market today.
So the big question is this: What were they thinking?
"Lets make the Aura a shiny piece of stainless steel turd and give it a hefty price tag of $2000 so people will buy it in this credit crunch."
- Reply
- 2009-08-23 07:07
- ibbx
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed