Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.6
- Performance
-
7.6
- ggd
- Report
- 0
this ph is nice to hold and good looking , and i like blue color also :)
but its not so small .. not so thin too. but just nice to hold.. features? not really impress me..
BUT this ph selling at S$ 700 is consider cheap in sg. it will even drop to S$500 in next 3 months i believe.
- Reply
- 2006-09-16 10:35
- PFM7
- U
- Lenny
- Report
- 0
Goodness. It's another one of those overpriced phones by Motorola.
For posers and fashionista wannabes...
- Reply
- 2006-09-16 08:41
- yqjb
- U
- Kal
- Report
- 0
@TRZp
What is comfortable what is not depends on many factors. People are ready to compromise on comfort level if the phone looks great and has good features. RAZR sold over 50m even with all its glitches. Thats an example.
With narrow phones you cant have a great display..you have 176x220. Samsung phones are NOT wide..they have same width as other normal phones with 240x320 QVGA screen in the market. They are just getting thinner and thinner. One can choose the one that feels comfortable to hold. Would you say the new RAZR maxx is wide? that is same 53m wide. Those phones are meant for multimedia..where as KRZR K1 is a pure fashion phone with nice look and finish.
- Reply
- 2006-09-16 08:41
- Ybt$
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
..Well.hello..mates.. indeed this phone looks great!!! and it will be very aprecciate for much time..but i definitly don't think is the best outthere,,so check te sansung X 820... for who's like lines and disigns.. and definitly dont think motorola can beat to nokia in features in any way..can be "blocky"?? maybe it is true.. most ppls like feel confortable and get easys gadgets..but also other more really enyoy to get "more sofisticates" phones,and OS symbian is so far the most used in the world.. but i really like the windows mobile Os,, but stil is a fact so,, ... so why the appasionate debate about it??? Anyway i wanted to say it is a great phone..!!
- Reply
- 2006-09-16 01:29
- j5@L
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
This phone is very comfortable........very much the opposite of those thin & wide Samsung.
Since Motorola start the successful thin phone trend with the RAZA design, Samsung follows & try to get a part of the market share........but failed because of ugly & uncomfortable designs!!! Now that Motorola realize the fault of the V3 line up(too wide & hence uncomfortable to hold), is coming out with a comfortable to hold phone which is 2mm thicker but a lot narrower.
Let's wait and see.......in a very short time, Samsung will follow this Motorola trend!!!
- Reply
- 2006-09-15 20:49
- TRZp
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
10 times better looking than any Samsung phone models you care to name........
Good look is the first piority of most phone buyers.
Who care about functions? As long as the phone has adequate functions; that's fine with most people. There's so many new techonology everyday, how can we catch up? Keep on changing phones everytime a manufacturer announces a new phone with higher spec. techonology???
- Reply
- 2006-09-15 20:37
- TRZp
- U
- Kai
- Report
- 0
This would have been a great phone if it was released a year ago. But with every phone on the market spotting a minimum of 2.0MP and a 262K colours screen, this phone to me is lacklustre.
As for super thin phones, the Ultra Series from Samsung seem to boast of more impressive specs for lesser price.
Unless you STILL love the Moto Razr design, go grab it.
- Reply
- 2006-09-15 17:15
- PFMh
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
moto phs do not impress me. V3i resolution is poorer than my samsung card ph P300. camera always lousy . I tried V3i. don't know abt this krzr. UI is not my type.
this ph design is great anyway, but its not too small. its longer and a bit thicker than V3i as to compensate width.
anyway, I may buy this ph as moto sell their ph like cheap toys in sg. :) can use 1 year and throw away.
- Reply
- 2006-09-15 16:55
- PFM7
- U
- Richard Buchanan
- Report
- 0
"and your motoroal will probably cause u cancer because of the high SAR!!! the moto L7 have 1.58!!!!!! in america the limit its 1.6 its barely passed!"
my goodness, is this all you can respond with? these asinine things? you nokia fanboys have been putting down motorola based on these ridiculous ideas and finally we rise up!! we will take no more!!
for every study that says cell phone radiation may cause cancer, there are two more which refute the idea! where is the first case of a person being sick from motorola high sar rated phone? if that were the case, moto's dead in the water! nobody would ever touch a razr or slvr or pebl!.....
"when people get sick of razr moto that its already happening razr sales are dropping so will motorola"
...instead the exact opposite is happening as motorola takes marketshare from nokia month after month due to global acceptance of the great razr phone!
http://www.smartmoney.com/oned...fb&nav=RSS20
sales have only increased! moto sold the 50 millionth RAZR in july and should likely be at 60 million by now. so you're wrong on both accounts!
to the person who speaks on price of the krzr, yes it is expensive now due to exclusivity of being the first. this happens with every good. but unlike nokia, when sales increase, motorola drops the price! there is no reason to maintain high resale value of a phone! how many people keep their phone pristine enough to be sold on ebay? the majority end up in the trashcan!
motorola doesn't purposely inflate phones for high profits, ripping off the customers. they get them as cheap as humanly possible. now that's how you do business! if moto wanted to, they could've kept the razr at $400 and kept it high fashion phone. instead they wanted the world to have it! nokia only does this for their cheap 6XXX little candybars. moto has changed the game!
if you want higher powered, you wait for hsdpa razr maxx. if you want something even higher, you go for linux smartphones such as a1200 MING or E680i (pictures of its much thinner successor E690 have surfaced: http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cel...199607.php). or wait for the Q gsm with hsdpa and wifi. you need something with even more functions? go ahead for n-series bricks. but moto has most of us, who use phones to make -phone calls- covered.
majority of people want slim and simple not chunky and complicated. unfortunately nokia was late to the party with their chunky blocks just when the industry was changing. now i bet they'll come announcing razr like simple slim phones by the end of the year.
- Reply
- 2006-09-15 00:44
- QsNS
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Same design, poor screen resolution, average camera, no radio.
better buy 6233/6131 or K800!
- Reply
- 2006-09-14 04:39
- wYI9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
it looks like a smarter idea to buy a n73, k800, d900 for the same or even LESS money. this doesn't work it.
- Reply
- 2006-09-14 04:12
- Pv9c
- U
- Darren B (UK)
- Report
- 0
Hi, I'm in th UK and currently have A Razr V3 Black which I've had a couple of years and is suffering from wear and tear.
The reasons why I like my Razr other than looking slick, it's reletivly small, and reliable. The menu has a proper key lock (pin code to unlock the keyboard) and also allows me to just lock certain apps (in my case Messaging is always locked). I also like the being able to put my most used options on the main dial so I have one touch access to "call-list", "messaging" and my "alarm clock". And Finally, I prefer clam-shell phones, but could be puruaded to go to a slider. I'm a photographer, so the camera-phone element doesn't appeal to me. MP3 might be interesting, but then what do I do with my iPod and esure headphones
What I would like to know is if the current crop of mobiles have these features or will I have to stay with Motorola, in particular wait for the KRZR to come out?
I just went to the phone shops to look at the Nokia phones mentioned here, they were non-working models so I couldn't check the menu system. So far I do not like the size of them, they are too bulky, and not very stylish.
Sony are releasing the Z610i which also looks interesting, but I remember the T68i interface was not very flexible, is it still the same?
Thanks in advance for the feedback.
- Reply
- 2006-09-13 17:13
- xvsV
- U
- Mr. T-Mobile
- Report
- 0
Ok folk's stop comparing this phone to the 8800 by Nokia. The 8800 is not even in the same class as the KRZR. No mem. card, class 2 bluetooth, class 8 Edge & Gprs etc... The KRZR is going to be the next evolution in phones. If you know anything about GSM phones, then you are aware that this phone will destroy all others. Just compare the hard facts and you will see. Also for those who say that Moto. phones are hard to use, Moto is only for those with a higher capacity for learning & understanding, basicly you need to have some brain power, so if this phone is to complicated for you GET SOME BRAINS.
- Reply
- 2006-09-13 17:12
- T2vv
- U
- jimmy
- Report
- 0
Hiya if your interested in this phone i got it! $520CDN is the price right now be one of the 1st to get this new phone from motorola.
- Reply
- 2006-09-13 08:39
- RX05
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Hi all
Everybody talking about 2MP camera, i think is still s..t if i want to make nice photos i will use my 8MP digi camera and not 2MP or 3.2MP camera phone because is not good enough. I m useing N8800si as spare phone for makeing calls and text and for everything else as net,mp3 etc. i m useing N73. My opinion Motorola will never be that good as Nokia. no way !!! Have a nice day everybody
- Reply
- 2006-09-12 13:47
- iIR0
- U
- Maffy
- Report
- 0
Welcome to the real world, here in the UK the V3 range is very popular with all, Nokia seem to have lost it's way, I wonder why manufacturers just seem to make "Toys" and very few "Business phones" I was recently in the states and most people were using phones that we had here 5 or 6 years ago, backward or what! Go for the Razors, nokia lost it when it dropped the 6310i-razors are excellent.
- Reply
- 2006-09-12 12:02
- iLSx
- U
- paul powell
- Report
- 0
i like to put any motorola phone in my backside as they are very slim mmmmmmmmm
- Reply
- 2006-09-11 15:28
- mXNH
- U
- jermaine
- Report
- 0
Even though I would personally but this phone anytime over Nokia 8800, I actually don't see much. What's so great about it? Has no 3G support and a 2MP camera. Kind of outdated. Yeah, it has a great design. But the price..arghhhh.....All you people out there....Wait another 2 months for BenQ-Siemens SL91. Now thats a phone. Check it out. Better design than any other phone so far and it's techonologically advanced.
- Reply
- 2006-09-11 12:12
- ibdN
- U

