Motorola KRZR K1 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.1
- Features
-
7.8
- Performance
-
7.8
- simon
- Report
im afraid motorola are hanging by a thread thay may have a been one of the first mobile companies but they are surving on the razr which people are now getting sick of,this once great phone is now nothing more than an embarassment to be seen with.they have changed colour and style of this phone but it is no longer cutting edge it has poor features,bad camera on all versions and a scruffy i/f which is overcomplicated and not user friendly,you may have to use your brain to get round the menus but why put people off your product by making out you have to be of superior intellect to use this product.
- Reply
- 2006-08-10 01:43
- n17x
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Why is that life span of battery of motorola products don't last after charging
- Reply
- 2006-08-08 11:50
- m4wa
- U
- T-MO GUY
- Report
I see alot of people saying bad thing's about Motorola. What you small minded people seem to forget is they were one of the first mobile phone producer's in the world. So that said, look they are still here, they must be doing something right or you people would'nt go out and buy their phone's and come to a site like this and talk crap about the company. Bottom line for all those who think they know some stuff about mobile phones, check this out, the phones you people expect in this country right now are not fully supported by any one given network, sure some company's may support some features on a sweet top of the line phone, but no one company by itself can support all the stuff we expect, at least not till the upcoming Spectrum Auction. Then things may change a little, but not like Japan and other countries, not any time soon. Also people.... this is going to be the best phone on the market all around when it is released, if all features are supported that is. I wonder who ever gets this phone will they BARR some of the features like VERIZON did on some of their phones, something to ponder. Oh ya I hear that MOTO's are the hardest phones to use, that must mean it requires some brain power to actually use one, that's for people who despise MOTO. Motorola is here to stay so deal with it.
- Reply
- 2006-08-08 02:32
- j@Zx
- U
- Neel
- Report
I think it will b more secured then Symbian coz it is mix of LINUX which is well known for its security & it has better graphics capability, And linux makes even a low specification machine run like Morice Green. And JAVA is well known for it application. so AS it IS MIX OF JAVA + LINUX it really can have some rocking features. Waiting to get my hand on my 1st JUIX phone
- Reply
- 2006-08-06 19:59
- ij96
- U
- Neel
- Report
@ Dan
The JUIX is far better the symbian OS. As per many sites JUIX is the best OS till date for any mobile. It can have some features less then some smartphones but it makes many smartphons look like dumbphone when compaired to it. It has more customizable feature then Symbian. U can add icons to the main menu, it has 12 equilizer settings, it has spatial.Belive me the JUIX is awesome. MOTO was considerd to have the worst OS in Mobiles But now they will b back with a bang with JUIX.The people who say MOTOS JUIX os sucks will never accept its better coz they hate MOTO and they will never accept that JUIX is better.So just don't listen to them. Just go to mobile-review site and read the rokr e2 review.It has Juix os. Its just a developing OS review. When it will hit the market it surly will have more features & the os surly would have improved by that time more then the review says. Just c it . I surly will have a MOTO phone with JUIX in it. Bye Take Care
- Reply
- 2006-08-06 19:54
- ij96
- U
- ladies
- Report
Im buying one is it good oh and i need some photos
thanks
- Reply
- 2006-08-06 10:03
- Rx5S
- U
- scotty15
- Report
for previous post: i dont hink its Crazer, it looks more like Crizzer to me theres no 'A' sound in it like RAZR if it didnt hav 'A' in it it wud b Rizzer see wat i mean?
- Reply
- 2006-08-06 06:52
- 43qs
- U
- Dan
- Report
Hey.... can anyone tell me the advantages of a LINUX interface? As in the Motorola JUIX interface? Is it better than symbian? Oh and does anyone know how its vid recording should be?
- Reply
- 2006-08-04 18:16
- 2W5q
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
seems as though motorola is trying to repackage the same quality in a different package. i wonder if they did anything to prevent dropped calls. any1 know how to pronounce the name of the thing?
- Reply
- 2006-08-03 19:10
- 4H7m
- U
- Sharif Haque Sumit
- Report
Nice,pretty looking phone.Display infomations mentioned here is wrong. Actual Dispaly for K1,GSM, is TFT 262k Colors, not 65k. CDMA version will be 65k.Surely this phone will be a success like razr v3.
- Reply
- 2006-08-03 06:26
- PWxc
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
its a pretty phone but its a year late. its not impressive. for the price its going to come, you can get a QVGA screen a radio and a 3mpx camera.
- Reply
- 2006-08-02 09:31
- Pv9c
- U
- defender
- Report
I was attending a meeting for a local provider and there was a motorola rep that was there and he had one of these!!!! Beautiful phone and it feels sooo good when you're using it, but he wouldn't let me take pictures. All in all I can't wait!. He said something about Moto trying to launch it in October
- Reply
- 2006-07-31 16:27
- jnZD
- U
- love
- Report
you would think moto would be smart enough for them to make the boot smaller but apparently not this is why the phone is so butt ugly
- Reply
- 2006-07-31 02:26
- j@Jw
- U
- Zulo
- Report
When this phone becomes I will buy one for my girl friend. It's a nice phone.
- Reply
- 2006-07-30 22:32
- jnZj
- U
- Neel
- Report
@www.benink.uni.cc . ya its really useless to have e qvga screen as main screen. But it really need a bigger outer screen. the qvga scren of rokr e2 is many times better then the 176*220 screen in every aspect from quality of text to picture. If MOTO can fit QVGA in a phone smaller in size then why can't it fit in in a flip phone? They r joking? If i m not mistaking it is going to b a costly phone. Then is it really a sin to expect a QVGA screen. They made a super looking phone. Let me imagine it has super features then Why it has 176*220 screen not QVGA which is better in all aspect. ANd evey single person will agree that Quality of QVGA is far better then 176*220 screen. And it is expected then MOTO will fit its sexy beauties with it.
- Reply
- 2006-07-29 20:11
- ijec
- U
- www.benink.uni.cc
- Report
Personally, I think thats the most drop dead, gorgeous phone ever. It keeps what works from the rar style but makes it even more sleek. Plus the features arent half that bad for such a tiny phone. My ony omplaint is with the external screen, it needs a border like on prevous models. Also, why does everyone care so much about it not having a QVGA screen? What are you going to do on this phone that you need a higher resolution screen for?
- Reply
- 2006-07-29 13:11
- 4TCJ
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed