Motorola ZN300 - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
1.7%
Total hits:
195868

Voting results

Design
8.5
Features
8.4
Performance
8.4
Votes:
1353

friends check its design with LG KC550

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-09 10:04
  • uNVA
  • U

Does anyone here have an IQ above 80??

How is this mid-range device ANY different from a mid-range device from SE, Nokia, LG or Samsung?

What part of MID-RANGE do you not understand??

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-09 06:32
  • 4HTQ
  • Q

Yawn. Motorola is over and out!

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-09 05:53
  • wfy$
  • C

excelent multimedia phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-09 05:42
  • nsCe
  • C

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-03-07 13:02 from nsCeWhy, moto are like 2 years behind everyone else...

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-09 01:08
  • 3Hj%
  • R

> In reply to Louie @ 2009-03-07 08:38 from vaPBYeah, quite "outdated" eh? See when will either the almighty brand or the I?Music brand will come out any phone which supports both GSM and TS-SCDMA....probably in YEARS to come.

Don't think the two other brands mentioned above even know how to make a dual mode GSM/CDMA phone.

Outdated tech eh?

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-09 01:05
  • Er2M
  • R

Quad-band GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), CDMA / TD
SCDMA
240 x 320 pixel QVGA display

3.1 megapixel camera, 8x digital zoom and editing options, LED flash

15-20 fps video capture and playback

Video Mixer (on-device video editing, transition and sound effects) Video Mixer gives you the option to add customizable or preloaded transitions and sound effects to videos

Facebook, YouTube and MySpace apps
Popular pre-loaded social media services such as Facebook, Myspace, Photobucket and YouTube let you publish photos, videos and blog postings, with just one click.

3.5mm headset jack
radio
Opera web browser

8MB of internal memory
MicroSDHC support up to 32GB

Talk time: up to 435 minutes
Stand-by time: up to 400 hours
excelexnt multimedia phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-08 04:59
  • nsCe
  • H

Why do motorola bother?!

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 15:58
  • S35r
  • U

everybody moto hater can say whatever like
but i love this good phone and wana buy it soon

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 13:02
  • nsCe
  • C

its to good handset

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 12:06
  • vGxx
  • Q

i like it

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 10:32
  • nsCe
  • C

Why motorola keeps on making phones like this??
VERY OUTDATED.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 08:38
  • vaPB
  • U

I'm sure, that Moto name will be equals to present Philips. Several years ago Philips was No1 in Europe and now it's asia product using Philips brand name. Motorola is so deep in trouble, you don't understand haw deep, I was here, I now...

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 07:14
  • 0xLV
  • U

Well put Stuart...

Many people think that EVERY device should come equipped with high end features such as GPS, Wi-Fi, doc. viewer...etc, etc. This merely a mid-range device.

Every company makes low ,mid ,& high end devices, from LG to Nokia, to SE, & so on.

If a particular model doesn't come equipped with what you need, look for something else. There are enough handsets to satisfy even the most hard-core user.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 06:59
  • 4HTQ
  • U

I can understand why there were many comments both positives & negatives on this phone, it's more to do with personal preference of different individuals. For me, this design is good, especially the metal back.

However, some comments require "further evaluation", like no 3G, no Wifi, no touchscreen and so on. From reading these comments, I can feel the person who posted these comments were actually looking or expecting this model to be a high end phone, unfortunately it's not. The specs clearly indicated that this model were produced to compete at the low to mid range market. For those interested to get a higher range touchscreen, 3G phone, look at A3100, for a good camera phone - ZN5, music phone - E8 and so on. The models are all separated in different RANGEs. Different PHONE RANGE competes in different MARKET RANGE and therefore different PRICE RANGE. A lot of readers here already knew this and they saw the specs, are aware of which market segment this ZN300 is targeting and commented fairly based on this information. I can't say the same for some comments here and straight away you'll know the they were posted without taking the PHONE RANGE into consideration. Yes, the ZN300 is the latest model of ZN series but it is also a lower range model as compare to ZN5. By knowing the correct range, the expectation level will be set in our conscious mind therefore our comment on ZN300 will be more reasonable & considerate.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 05:33
  • vV5B
  • U

very beautiful

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 05:13
  • nsCe
  • U

> In reply to [deleted post]Then,get outta here.We don't need your explicit words here.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 04:06
  • wreI
  • R

> In reply to kobe24 @ 2009-03-06 17:30 from vf2xIt's not a flip phone.It's a slider.Don't get us wrong with your wrong statement.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 04:01
  • wreI
  • R

> In reply to JO_WEW @ 2009-03-07 03:09 from PxGRI'm asking you..Why there is N76 which copy all the V3 design? This ZN300 has a far way better design than the damn cheap and plastic N81.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 03:58
  • wreI
  • R

> In reply to Muzzo INC @ 2009-03-06 16:14 from fuPyIt's a mid-low phone.Don't get us wrong.It will be on an affordable price.It's better than Nokia 7100 Supernova which has 5 mb internal with no card slot.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-07 03:55
  • wreI
  • R

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.