Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III vs. HTC One X: Alien vs. Predator
HTC One X review: eXtra specialNokia E52
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.3
- Features
-
8.3
- Performance
-
8.3
| General | 2G Network | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
|---|---|---|
| 3G Network | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | |
| HSDPA 850 / 2100 - US version | ||
| Announced | 2009, May | |
| Status | Available. Released 2009, July |
| Body | Dimensions | 116 x 49 x 9.9 mm, 54 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 98 g |
| Display | Type | TFT, 16M colors |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 240 x 320 pixels, 2.4 inches (~167 ppi pixel density) |
| Sound | Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones |
|---|---|---|
| Loudspeaker | Yes | |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes |
| Memory | Card slot | microSD, up to 16GB, 1GB included |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | 60 MB |
| Data | GPRS | Class 32 |
|---|---|---|
| EDGE | Class 32, 296 / 178.8 kbits | |
| Speed | HSDPA, 10.2 Mbps; HSUPA, 2 Mbps | |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, UPnP & DLNA technology | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.0 with A2DP | |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| Camera | Primary | 3.2 MP, 2048x1536 pixels, fixed focus, LED flash |
|---|---|---|
| Video | Yes, VGA@15fps | |
| Secondary | QVGA videocall camera |
| Features | OS | Symbian OS, S60 rel. 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 600 MHz ARM 11 | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email | |
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite | |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio with RDS | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS support; Nokia Maps 3.0 | |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | |
| Colors | Metal Grey Aluminium, Golden Aluminium, Graphite Grey, Black | |
| - WMV/RV/MP4/3GP video player - MP3/WMA/WAV/RA/AAC/M4A music player - Document editor (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF) incl. MS Office 2007 support via free update - Organizer - Photo editor - Voice memo - Predictive text input |
| Battery | Standard battery, Li-Po 1500 mAh (BP-4L) | |
|---|---|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 672 h (2G) / Up to 432 h (3G) | |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G) | |
| Music play | Up to 40 h |
| Misc | SAR US | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
|---|---|---|
| SAR EU | 1.20 W/kg (head) | |
| Price group |  |
| Tests | Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 75dB |
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -85.3dB / Crosstalk -85.4dB | |
| Camera | Photo | |
Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more
Nokia E52 - user opinions and reviews
- Anonymous
Have been using it for over 3 years now and quite happy with it though it has hanged on me a few times but the large screen and buttons are a plus for me. I dislike touchscreens and qwerty keys on a mobile phone.
- Reply
- 2012-05-28 14:44
- YTM@
- H
- RaajOsahan
I am using Nokia E52 for more than a year now. Nokia needs to concentrate more on business phone, which E52 successfully qualifies as. Though not expensive but the feature list is expansive. I use Internet (Inbuilt Browser and Downloaded Opera), Nimb...
- Reply
- 2012-05-28 10:40
- mI6Z
- H
- sunny
I dont like the camera , it always click blurry images..and low video quality for a 3.2 MP. Sometimes its software fails and automatically reboots . Outdated OS ,so dont purchase this phone . go for upper ones..
- Reply
- 2012-05-28 10:21
- xZs}
- H
