LG BL20 New Chocolate - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.5
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.3
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to vin @ 2009-10-21 04:43 from PEdGbro 16m is hell lot more better than 256k.
16m means 16million colours whereas 256k means only 256 thousand colours, so the diffrence is not twice, thrice or even four fold the diffrence is HUGE 62 TIMES.
with 16m ur pics, videos etc will look more lively n colourfull.
- Reply
- 2009-11-20 15:21
- vIdc
- R
- kaz
- Report
bl40 is way better
n more overe wats the use of a touch screen when it has no wifi
- Reply
- 2009-11-14 05:50
- 0C31
- U
- Honey
- Report
Hi does any1 know if this phone is in South Africa as yet and how much does it go for, ta.
- Reply
- 2009-11-12 08:19
- 95jW
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to immanumber1 @ 2009-10-25 10:31 from v0Xttroll more plz
- Reply
- 2009-11-11 03:41
- NGeK
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
lg chocolate with touchscreen,from verizon at 80 $.click here for photos http://klaudyu44.wordpress.com...-de-lg-bl40/
- Reply
- 2009-11-06 09:19
- pkIT
- U
- ramsee
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-02 03:56 from nGJUNO NO its very good backup
- Reply
- 2009-11-04 15:37
- vGDu
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
Its a nice phone larger in lenth then the original chocolate, To be honest its a bit big for my pockets lol :P
- Reply
- 2009-11-02 22:45
- mXBu
- U
- stealth
- Report
look nice, but i think the price can be cheaper bcos i can get a better phone with nokia with much more good stuffs
- Reply
- 2009-10-27 19:49
- uC03
- U
- immanumber1
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-18 05:56 from Yct9f(x)mv is much better than tje SNSD
- Reply
- 2009-10-25 10:31
- v0Xt
- R
- vin
- Report
What is the different between 262K colours and 16M colours....which is best. i hope 16M
- Reply
- 2009-10-21 04:43
- PEdG
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
bummer, terrible video quality...
guess i'll keep lookin
- Reply
- 2009-10-14 16:38
- wgV5
- C
- Daniel
- Report
Extremely nice phone, one for the aesthetics just like the first chocolate. The first one was a perfect device but flawed by buggy, unreliable software - hope they gained experience over the last few years. The BL40 looks like a very nice phone as well, but for people like me who couldn't care less about all that touchscreen smartphone hype lately, and would rather have a phone to make calls and write messages with... especially if it means you won't have to take the recharger with you everywhere because the gimmicks drain the battery all the time. Sure it would be nice if it had WLAN like its bigger brother, but there's only so much you can put into a standard phone. Besides, a small non-touchscreen phone isn't really made for browsing the web anyway. Given I never feel the urge to read mails and browse the web on the go (except for the occasional bus schedule) it seems like my chocolate KG800 will be replaced by a new chocolate BL20 rather than a BL40.
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 04:38
- iGuF
- C
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed