Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
8.2
- Performance
-
8.1
- jecco
- Report
- 0
camera is average and it freezes when going to txt mssge from playing music..its expensive and cracked keypad just makes it redundant cause of repair costs,,seperate 3.5mm jack needed and wifi destroys battery
- Reply
- 2009-08-13 01:27
- nGBp
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
the problem with the SAR is not when we use wi-fi. the problem is when we use it to make a call.
when smoking became usual, every company told it wasnīt dangerous.
i donīt need to read anything from any authority or commission.they can say what they want to keep us living a lie, just to sell a lot of phones.
of course we live surrounded by radiation, but when it is so near to our heads and so intense....why not to be careful and buy a phone with the lowest SAR possible??
OF COURSE PHONES WITH HIGH SAR MAKE HEADACHES to some people, and there is a real danger of cancer and other problems.
we just have to think we our heads, and not believe in some "authorities" or "commissions"!
OF COURSE WE CANīT PROVE IN A LIVING HUMAN BEING, but...everybody knows that this kind of radiation is dangerous, but we love "toys", isnīt it?
i love this toys too, but mine donīt have more than 0.5 of SAR.
iīm a doctor, and i know what iīm saying! and i donīt need any commission to make me believe what they want to be believed!
one thing is true....the lowest SAR, the better to our health!
until today nobody proved in alive humans that smoking leads to cancer, but...now everybody agree that there no doubt about this, isnīt it??
best regards to all!
(and is a stupid thing to throw people with reports from commissions and authorities that are "supposed" to be true!if we read their statements, they are careful. they donīt say that radiation isnīt dangerous, and they donīt state it is safe too!!right??)
- Reply
- 2009-08-13 00:50
- psnc
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
For all people who complain about the high SAR level.
Have you ever thought of the wifi in your homes or in the streets? You would be surprised to know it. And now if you think that where you live or work , even with a wifi SAR lower than 1.6, you are exposed the whole day to radiation, you can stop thinking that this phone will kill you and you'd better switch all the wifi around you off!
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 15:35
- xC56
- U
- lol
- Report
- 0
Great LG for innovative Prodcut design.
today, i got my crystal. Great Design & concept for transparent keypad.
I like this phone very much.. Great job LG.. GREAT..
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 10:00
- P}v4
- U
- SolidSnake
- Report
- 0
For all the people who are asking about the camera quality, I will be honest it is not that great (unless you take pictures in the sun during the day).
I also have a n97 at the moment and that takes better pictures with a 5mp camera than crystal's 8mp cam. So far the best camera phone I have used is the C905 but that phone has too many other problems (i.e. broken keys and faulty ear piece).
However, this is my first LG phone and I am really impressed with the touch screen/keypad capabilities. S-class is also top notch but it will take sometime for me to get adjusted to this change.
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 08:33
- q{pN
- H
- SolidSnake
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Lynne @ 2009-08-03 06:42 from v}${ - click to readRead my post below.
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 08:25
- q{pN
- R
- SolidSnake
- Report
- 0
> In reply to you @§§h0L3 @ 2009-08-04 01:33 from LFn0 - click to readYou CAN take pics with the secondary camera. When you turn the camera on, go into settings > Swap Camera > Select Secondary. Simple as that!
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 08:24
- q{pN
- R
- SolidSnake
- Report
- 0
> In reply to SolidSnake @ 2009-08-02 16:43 from q{pN - click to readTo answer my own question this phone does support both name and number smart dialing.
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 08:18
- q{pN
- R
- SolidSnake
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-07 17:02 from kJdg - click to readNo word from LG at the moment about releasing the phone in North America. I just got mine shipped from the UK.
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 08:16
- q{pN
- R
- SAR LEVEL
- Report
- 0
Dear all..
plz dun scare ppl off from such a great new phone just bcoz of the own defined SAR level!!
CRYSTAL SAR level is complied within the SAR limit for human body which is 1.47W/kg ( max for states is 1.6W and max for europe is 2.0W )
for your info , many full specs phone with wifi has over 1.0 and above SAR level. Like our dear Apple 3G has 1.388W/kg!!
The factsheets :
Federal Communications Commission (United States)
There is no scientific evidence that proves that wireless phone usage can lead to cancer or a variety of other problems, including headaches, dizziness or memory loss.
Singapore Health Sciences Authority
Up to the present time, all international and national committees that have evaluated this whole body of evidence have reached the same conclusions: that there are no established health effects from EMF exposures below the international guidelines limits
I owned VIEWTY : Best phone ever !!
now i owned CRYSTAL : even better / touch screen is superb and all other functions are simple and great. wifi is very efficient and fast.
only 1 bad point i found so far : camera of 8mp is not good !! viewty camera is much better although it's just 5mp..
for those dying for this phone , give it a try !! u wont regret!!
cheers
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 03:51
- vjq9
- C
- ohmygah
- Report
- 0
omg this phone is hot. omg i really want it but i was just wondering does the back of it look dodgy? cause in the 360 view it looked weird. also can you put themes in it? =]
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 01:28
- CpJ5
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
to know about the SAR level of a phone, you have to read the proper info in the last pages of the user manual which comes within the phone box.
sometimes we can check it searching in the google.
but this model has been dificult.
in my country it is on sale now, and i went to a PHONEHOUSE store, and asked them to show me the phone to test it, and also the user manual.
i couldnīt believe when i saw the SAR level.
i have had a few LGs, and they usually have a low SAR level. and thatīs good.
but this GD900 is a stupid exception.
Iīm sad because i really wanted to buy one, but....after this, NO WAY!
I love my health!
i donīt care if this phone is one of the best ever, and almost perfect in features.
good luck for those who will buy it.
iīll wait for some next beauty from LG, similar to this model.
i believe LG will have a great success with this GD900, and in a nearly future they will do something similar to the CRYSTAL, and better!
by the way....you can find tech info about SAR, in the FCC website.
they are responsable for all the SAR tests of all the phones, before they can be allowed to go to the sales market.
SAR info is ALWAYS in the last pages (or first pages, depending the companies) of the major phonesīs user manual.
- Reply
- 2009-08-12 00:56
- ps4f
- U
- Thomas
- Report
- 0
Wtf?! First in ranking by rate hahaha:
no gps, no operating system this mobile phone is not good!
- Reply
- 2009-08-11 17:20
- p4CD
- C
- roop
- Report
- 0
hey can u tell how we can knw about SAR???? PLZ ........
- Reply
- 2009-08-11 15:34
- utn@
- Q
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-11 04:59 from psnk - click to readThis might be the reason why it won't be released in USA...
- Reply
- 2009-08-11 15:06
- nbuy
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-10 11:13 from nT3D - click to readyea i agreed hehe
- Reply
- 2009-08-11 13:02
- wceG
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
thereīs just 1 bad thing in this phone!!
the SAR level is dangerous!!how could LG fail iņ this matter??
LG phones usually have low SAR level, and thatīs good!
but this model has 1,47!!(almost the max allowed in USA!)
this level is good enough to frie our brains in a few minutes!
so dissapointing!
- Reply
- 2009-08-11 04:59
- psnk
- U

