HTC One X review: eXtra special
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III vs. HTC One X: Alien vs. PredatorPhilips V808 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.8
- Features
-
8.7
- Performance
-
8.7
- benny
- Report
- 0
i realy feel sorry about the philips ,just look ate the Specifications they are horible:no os, 3.2 pix camera, no wifi....ncncncn o philips what have become of you...go back and continue with making lams,lights
- Reply
- 2009-10-21 19:01
- SXnx
- U
- Rip
- Report
- 0
No OS?? I though it was Android! Maybe it's the strawberry shortcake release...
- Reply
- 2009-10-21 18:14
- G2GS
- U
- Tim
- Report
- 0
Well why does it say "OS: No" when the picture shows something looking very, very much like Android? Have they gone down the route of FakeDroid?
- Reply
- 2009-10-21 16:34
- S12U
- Q
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
i rly hope that it doesnt hv a resistive touchscreen and instead uses capacitive
- Reply
- 2009-10-21 15:37
- Ac3H
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to huli ka @ 2009-08-23 22:25 from wYBF - click to readsome of the phones are still designed by Philips. This one, obviously, is not one of them. This has China written all over it. In fact, it's pretty easy to figure out which phones are designed by Philips and which are designed by Chinese factories.
- Reply
- 2009-09-23 09:56
- i%x@
- R
- huli ka
- Report
- 0
a repost from PHILIPS TM700
"remember, Philips quit the mobile phone market in 2006 when it sold it off to CEC (a chinese company) all the phones post 2006 are CEC phones with a philips badge stuck on. This agreement will run out in a few years time and hopefully someone in Eindhoven will realise that Philips, with their technical know how, can build awesome phones (xeniums battery show this) if only they backed themselves to this."
whaaa.. another rebranded china made dual sim phone...
- Reply
- 2009-08-23 22:25
- wYBF
- U
