Sony Xperia S review: NXT of kin
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III review: S to the thirdMotorola Aura - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.5
- 100 Moto
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Vince @ 2008-11-04 12:44 from E0m1 - click to readSo Moto can't "reinnovate" V70 while another company can KEEP reinnovating its own 8810?
- Reply
- 2008-11-05 01:29
- Er2M
- R
- 100 Moto
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-11-04 21:14 from SH95 - click to readIf American phones were so bad, why so many people were using them when your favorite mobile phone brands were making only TV's?
Oh, that's probably because you weren't able to afford a phone back then....which means you will not likely ever "SPARE" US$2000 for a phone...
- Reply
- 2008-11-05 01:27
- Er2M
- R
- arxodas
- Report
- 0
and for all moto users i also have z6 linux based over ayear and is cool!i post this additional not to think that i have something with motorola!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 22:07
- 3AmP
- U
- arxodas
- Report
- 0
v70 was the same in its ages!the same story the same failure!if u want lux phone buy NOKIA 8800ARTE -CARBON etc.or VERTU!!!!!!!BUT NOT 1 LIKE THIS.SUCH PRICE FOR WHAT?EVEN porsche design IS CHEAPER!!!!!!!!!!!mercy motorola,market is tired and full with kits!nothing elegant or lux !
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 22:04
- 3AmP
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
finally one phone who can replace iphone as worst phone ever , have nothing expensi material like rubbish same camera not even usual specs expecteded
so throw ur money on bin or buy this phone just same thing , give me 1990$ and buy an nokia 1200 even better.
American phones are just crap forget USA like ur economy ur phones are just failure.
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 21:14
- SH95
- U
- Magnus
- Report
- 0
I don't understand why it is so expensive... with this spec I would never expend that much.
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 18:54
- LxgX
- C
- haider
- Report
- 0
y does some one buy 8800 then this fone is royale............. beautiful...............
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 17:07
- u1vG
- U
- Nathan W
- Report
- 0
Nothing exciting here. Boring! yeah 2.0 mega pix? Oh yeah Can't wait. Didn't even let us know much of anything. Call this build up for a phone? If it was a metro pcs phone. Yeah Metro pcs. Then it would sound good. Motorola should stick to computer chips. And for all you all about design folks, nothing looks like shallow like this phone.
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 16:18
- jW{q
- C
- tomas
- Report
- 0
Don’t matter how it looks or how much it cost, at the end of the day it still is nothing else but Motorola…
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 16:15
- jZ${
- U
- Vince
- Report
- 0
The pimp phone is back! Take the old V70 from 2002, remove exterior antenna, get a color screen and sell it as "innovative".
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 12:44
- E0m1
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Why on earth this geat phone like AURA hasnt got a SD memory card slot.
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 01:20
- 2GtL
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
why on earth this new great motorola aura has no card slot for a sd micro memory plus.why??
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 01:19
- 2GtL
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Vertu phones have the the strongest & most stable reception of any phone I have used. Hope that the Aura will beat it.
Motorola phones are most reliable compare to any other make, but battery still sucks!
- Reply
- 2008-11-03 16:04
- UisK
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Vertu by Nokia, step aside, cause the best luxuary phone is coming from Motorola in the form of this Aura.
- Reply
- 2008-11-03 16:00
- UisK
- U
- 100 Moto
- Report
- 0
> In reply to yuhas @ 2008-11-03 06:52 from ibYK - click to readSo which manufacturer does "not" UPGRADE certain line of its phone?
Almighty brand - 88xx...
I ? Music brand - K??0, W???
Smartphone only brand - Touch, Touch Dual, Touch....
So only other brands are allowed to "upgrade" its existing lines but not Moto?
- Reply
- 2008-11-03 10:35
- Er2M
- R
- Daian O.
- Report
- 0
Motorola Aura, a lovely great looking phone ! The minute I saw it, I have realised that looks like my older V70. After all, both phones cost plenty of money. They are the most luxury phones made by Motorola. As V70 was able and it is able to function at its best for years, so will be Aura ! Great job, Moto !
- Reply
- 2008-11-03 07:53
- mASd
- U
- yuhas
- Report
- 0
Look at Moto's RAZR2 V9x. Why did Moto announced V9x? What's the difference between V9 and V9x? Only the latter equipped with GPS...
Guess what's next: V9xx with Wi-fi capability?
;)
- Reply
- 2008-11-03 06:52
- ibYK
- U
- 100 Moto
- Report
- 0
> In reply to yuhas @ 2008-10-31 09:42 from ibYK - click to readSo which part of my message was false? When and where did I "insult" anyone?
If you ask me to be respectful to the negative comments about Moto, shouldn't you also respect "positive" comments as well?
Was I wrong about those who can't afford to "SPARE" US$2000 for a phone are likely to comment the phone is not worth the price? Do people buy TAG or other Swiss watches just because they have more functions than G-shocks? (No offense to owners of any brand, just different people have different preferences, and I don't see how those who cannot SPARE USD$2000 can speak on behalf of those who do...)
- Reply
- 2008-11-03 01:21
- Er2M
- R
