Motorola Aura - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
2.4%
Total hits:
557910

Voting results

Design
8.2
Features
7.4
Performance
7.6
Votes:
2469

STFU SymbianKing !!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-23 18:57
  • jEXh
  • U

how nice. 7yrs later they release the upgrade version of the v70.

fugly.

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-22 09:05
  • IaHM
  • U

this phone is for nuts cant believe? :D




Symbian Rulezzzz!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-17 00:50
  • RBAN
  • U

good quality...competitive...

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-15 10:13
  • wc7c
  • C

i don't think motorols is such a useless one try my model moto rokr e8 yeah it is very good u csn reply me if u csnnot fing sny festures in mine......................

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-11 22:30
  • PAYh
  • U

Very, very nice display... OLED display.

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-11 08:05
  • 8PeV
  • C

aura is realy BEAUTIFUL
im realy on WONDER why design vote 8.2 ???!!!!!

design is #10 from 10

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-10 15:46
  • Sbg{
  • C

y it cost more Rs 87,200 /- in india

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-03 06:26
  • utsS
  • U

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-28 11:29
  • TRZp
  • C

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-23 07:07 from ibbxyou have right, this is a very ugly phone, for a very expensive price!The tecnical featuring is a middle suite.Y nto found nothig famuos in this phone!

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-27 19:57
  • pk%4
  • R

> In reply to david13 @ 2009-08-20 18:29 from M3s@If Motorola go back to the drawing board and come up with similar designs, likes of Nokia, Samsungs and Sony Erricson etc., then that's not Motorola anymore!?

Motorola phones are unique

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 00:45
  • UisK
  • R

One word. Ugly. It's been getting terrible reviews from all over. On the design front, not everyone thinks it looks stunning, in fact most people who have spoken of it think its ugly. It has virtually zero features compared to other phones available in the market today.

So the big question is this: What were they thinking?

"Lets make the Aura a shiny piece of stainless steel turd and give it a hefty price tag of $2000 so people will buy it in this credit crunch."

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-23 07:07
  • ibbx
  • U

I find it amusing... and a little sad that people are openly admitting that they'd buy this overpriced gimmick if they had the money.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-22 14:01
  • iiap
  • U

Motorola are the under performers when it comes to the mobile market. They try to be different with their silly design but do not understand their market or the compitition. Motorola need to go back to the drawing board and come up with similar designs, likes of Nokia, Samsungs and Sony Erricson etc.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-20 18:29
  • M3s@
  • U

iyts good idea. futuristic but ugly

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-11 08:27
  • wgbW
  • C

I'm not gonna lie. I want this phone something feirce--but if its not a smartphone I don't have much use for it.

It looks positively amazing, and has gotten pretty good reviews.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-10 16:50
  • j8LN
  • U

> In reply to Bluejackmac @ 2009-07-20 04:34 from mRtuMay be you can have it frist, try it. them say say say ......

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-09 18:05
  • vjtr
  • Q

value for money

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-06 16:18
  • vwXf
  • C

for those of you saying this phone will break easily, it won't. read the specs.
i think it's a great design and it is a work of art.
if i had the money i'd definately buy it.

motorola comes out with the coolest phones.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-05 05:59
  • 4LXC
  • U

> In reply to John castillo @ 2009-06-13 07:35 from vGjhHi John, I'm experiencing the same symptoms -- screen distortion (flickering, offset display), random volume decrease while navigating through menus ... Did you update the software by any chance or try connecting it with p2k commander?

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-02 02:32
  • YdgE
  • R

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.