Sony Xperia S review: NXT of kin
Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coatedSamsung C6620 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.0
- Features
-
6.8
- Performance
-
6.8
- Han
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Han @ 2009-06-01 21:36 from mYpb - click to readWell, I found out how this works by accident, just press the red hang-up button for a second or two does the trick.
- Reply
- 2009-06-05 22:00
- mYpb
- R
- Han
- Report
- 0
Got this phone for about a week or so. I have a question about it. Is it possible to block the buttons on the phone? On my previous phone, a nokia, I could do this by pressing the select button followed by a '*'. That does not work. When carrying the phone in my pocket I have already phoned several people, without me noticing. Very annoying and ambarassing. I couldn't find this option in the manual, but I cannot immagine that samsung forgot this feature. Any help is appreceated!
Han.
- Reply
- 2009-06-01 21:36
- mYpb
- Q
- Sinx
- Report
- 0
20MB internal memory for Windows Mobile 6.1 ?????
Are you kidding...???
- Reply
- 2009-05-20 06:04
- inZ7
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Price should be less USD200. Lowest internal memory, No camera Flash, No Radio, No Wifi. Nokia E63 has everything you need at USD250
- Reply
- 2009-03-15 05:08
- symr
- U
- Anon
- Report
- 0
I could get this baby for cca 80 EUR. As I don't need WiFi (1GB/month internet traffic for free in my subscription plan - that's more than enough for my personal needs - and this phone has HDSPA, which is not present in E63 for example), this seems like a perfect choice for a budget smartphone.
Well done, Samsung.
- Reply
- 2009-03-12 19:26
- pqZx
- C
- Carlos
- Report
- 0
So professional, but without wi-fi??????
What is Samsung thinking about?
- Reply
- 2009-01-28 16:55
- M3WZ
- C
- Sunburn
- Report
- 0
A good alternative to Nokia E63 for those who prefer Window Mobile over Symbian.
- Reply
- 2009-01-06 10:19
- PZeb
- U
- Justin
- Report
- 0
I Do like the looks of this phone...
The specs are not so impressive
- Reply
- 2008-11-07 09:20
- iyCK
- C
- Wally
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Kal @ 2008-11-05 16:04 from vwdn - click to readI said is a copy of thr pantech slate because they seem to similar in external design, i never talk about features or specs, i know that this samsung is far better than the poor pantech....
So, if you want i will say things in other way.
Pantech slate is a copy of this samsung.
- Reply
- 2008-11-06 04:29
- iBtv
- R
- Kal
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Wally @ 2008-11-05 06:27 from iBtv - click to readits damn insulting to even say it's a copy of pentech. That phone is not even a winmo. Have you seen Samsung i320 which was released in 2006?
here have a look : http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i320-1442.php
This is colorfull version of i320. And yes the coloring comes pretty close to Blackberry 8707v. but that's about it. Lets not say this a copy of this and that specially Nokia, as you should know blackjacks are there for quite a long time now. cheers
- Reply
- 2008-11-05 16:04
- vwdn
- R
- Wally
- Report
- 0
A better copy of Pantech Slate, becasue their are similiar in design and features... Slate wins with gps but lacks a memory card slot...
Good samsung, nothing from another world but is a new phone... very colorful...
Design: 6 (Good design, colorful but conservative in all lines, qwerty keypad seems very confortble and colorful too, great big size of the display, well done for samsung... still to improve)
Features: 8 (Great features, good resolution of the display, edge, 3G (yes!!), bluetooth with A2DP, usb, HSDPA to navegate in Internet, decent 2mp camera with video recording and yes people a micro sd that can extend the memory to 8gb, but this phone lacks gps that can be a minor thing but it lacks wifi that today is very useful and is a point less, why no wifi?)
Performance: 5 (Like i said in other phones eith standard battery... standard is nothing impressive, just 5)
Well, good phone and very colorful... if you want a great color look buy it!
- Reply
- 2008-11-05 06:27
- iBtv
- H
