Samsung i637 Jack - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
2.2%
Total hits:
188280

Voting results

Design
7.7
Features
7.6
Performance
7.6
Votes:
474

i think this phone is lost in samsung it should be in BlackBerry like wtf???

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-27 17:45
  • whB9
  • U

bb competitor...

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-27 15:59
  • iwtr
  • U

it's look like BB's

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-26 12:32
  • tDBM
  • C

where i can buy this one ? i'm at indonesia ?
who knows the price ?? thx

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-23 04:06
  • wr4e
  • U

do they do this in black?

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-21 18:06
  • 0y9@
  • Q

i637 jack - off

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-21 18:05
  • 0y9@
  • U

> In reply to never again @ 2009-05-19 17:43 from MYk9Yeah , sure ;)

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-20 12:56
  • iGfT
  • R

bought the phone and the key were falling of after a couple of days; Samsung quality is really very bad; I will go back to RIM or Nokia.

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-19 17:43
  • MYk9
  • C

do you know if this phone can work with bb enterprise - can i get mail the same way as i get it on my bb?

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-19 16:08
  • Nhfh
  • Q

> In reply to A J @ 2009-05-15 11:54 from ptJfRight because BB's invented the rear facing camera.....
Oh wait my BJ2 has a rear facing camera.. Oh snap so did my BJ1.
No kidding its going to look similar to a BBerry. Its the standard smartphone layout.

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-18 06:46
  • iRHv
  • R

Who cares if it's a copy or not??? It's all about bringing to market the things people want...and this phone gives an WinMo Std user EVERYTHING!

It's a MUCH better form-factor and camera than the BB Bold....and it's not a "kind of" supported platform like the Nokia.

Kudos to Samsung for this little gem!

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-18 01:46
  • 02eJ
  • C

i think im gonna love this phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-17 22:50
  • GAdr
  • U

624Mhz, 512ROM, No FM Radio, No front Camera

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-17 13:48
  • symn
  • U

samsung jackberry?

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-17 08:54
  • vx6p
  • U

It looks like the Moto Q9, however the samsung has better specifications than the Moto

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-16 22:24
  • F8ZX
  • U

it's trully a blackberry copy from the looks down to the specs but I think it's AT&T who should be blamed for it.

it's for the american market, no body is gonna buy that phone in asia.

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-16 22:12
  • vpd3
  • U

no video call... what!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-16 21:15
  • wr94
  • U

Samsung i637 's design is same Bold Blackberry .... I don't know Samsung ....

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-16 19:53
  • uY}B
  • F

wow !! what a phone samsung rocks

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-16 14:59
  • NHUD
  • U

i hate it when carriers rename phones- Fido in canada carries the samsung BlackJack2 but they've named it the Jack, and now this is out...

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-16 10:48
  • Ycud
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.