Sagem MY C5-2 - user opinions and reviews

Sagem

Voting results

Design
8.0
Features
7.6
Performance
7.7
Votes:
1921
 Hits:
214911

Pages: 1 23…2526

it's the crapest phone ever i had it for 2 hours and i sat on it and the screen broke. by the way i'm not a fat girl it's just a crappy phone

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-23 05:45
  • vu%4
  • U

WOW!! ive had this phone for 3 years now and have dropped it, stood on it, got it wet and sat on it many times and it just goes and goes, no drama with this phone, simple, easy to use and gets the job done. if you want a simple basic phone, this is the one for you!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-14 06:24
  • F@ic
  • U

The phone is fine yes but some of the features in the manual do not apply. May be the battery life could be extended. Otherwise a fair model.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-07 10:41
  • SXXC
  • F

i hate the phone. It does not automatically saves time.

  • Reply
  • 2008-08-01 14:41
  • 0uMu
  • C

im telling you dis fone is boring as. iv had it 4 3 years now n im so over it. i mean it doesn't even have bluetooth, i just can't wait till i get a new fone. its dumb....

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-25 12:52
  • vuFg
  • U

How do you take out the battery?please tell me someone :D

  • Reply
  • 2008-07-11 18:25
  • pp3w
  • U

I still have this phone and i'm only going to get a new one when this one stops working. It's a very cute and good phone. The only thing i don't like about it is that there is no bluetooth. but whatever. great great phone! an oldshcool

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-09 14:29
  • pXKx
  • U

i've had this phone for over 2 years now.. it was reall good at the time i got it, but now it really sucks!!! it doesn't even have any good features..

  • Reply
  • 2008-05-03 13:40
  • P$jG
  • U

this phone is alright when it was new but now its just sad for whoever owns one its gotta gbe the worst phone ever its so damn slow to load to
My current phone is the sony ericsson w800

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-23 12:46
  • 2Gpe
  • U

got one. it's a good phone but the ringtones are not loud enough

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-05 22:00
  • 40DN
  • U

ive got a c5-2v and i got it from a friend who had it 4 2 years n ive now had it 4 another year. and i can say neither of us r very careful. ive dropped it a few times from standing height on2 bitcumin n it just bounced, nothing wrong at all. ive neva had ne probs at all with it. i found it really easy 2 use n the small size is good coz ive got a tiny hand.
im upgrading now because its gettin a bit slow n the buttons sumtimes take a bit 2 work, but its served me well

  • Reply
  • 2008-03-03 10:57
  • w6X%
  • U

Whoa! This phone is still available? I remember back in 2005 I used to have this phone, (sobs), it was a really good phone back then! Really miss it, good job I've upgraded though!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-19 17:08
  • MMyL
  • U

This was a rubbish phone. Why did i buy it?
Well it was because i had no idea about how
good other phones could be.

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-27 17:51
  • n5m9
  • U

i thought visually this phone is cute because of its size but its a shame it doesn't have blue tooth. decent phone if you don't really care about overall features except making calls.

  • Reply
  • 2008-01-05 15:31
  • 2Ca1
  • U

ive had this fone for a year now and i hate it
it doesnt have many good features
and the cemera quality is pretty bad
also its quite slow

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-22 04:33
  • Rxdu
  • U

i had this phone for less then a year and am currently getting a motorola v6 maxx this is an alrite fone for begginners,i liked it at start but too basic,no bluetooth,bad camera,only 30sec recording etc.................i dont reccomend this phone

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-17 08:40
  • Ui9b
  • U

This is now sold on Play.com in the UK for £25, a basic but plastic phone

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-27 16:55
  • MIaF
  • U

I got this phone and its not too bad yes it doesn't have blue tooth which is a big let down but 4 a 1st phone 4 a kid it would be okay plus the pink one with no annteneye is small and ya can put it in ya pocket

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-18 20:38
  • 0p9x
  • U

this is a shokka of a phone no bluetooth but whats wrorst the buttons and the battery life fkn shocking they shud be ashamed

i rate it

2/10

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-25 11:47
  • U2T}
  • U

Dont Get This Phone. Simple. Theres a reason its price went from 180 to 150 to 100 to 50 dollars quickly (AUS). The LEDs cease to show some shades, camera scratches, buttons wreck screen, poor battery, not durable at all. It does have a standard set of features (camera, mp3 ringtones,voice recorder) but it is very boring. trust me, dont get it. Unless your a prissy little girl that only carries it in a phone sock all dat. not durable

  • Reply
  • 2007-07-22 12:49
  • AesZ
  • U
Pages: 1 23…2526

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.