Sagem MY X-6 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
7.0
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.4
- Votes:
- 1779
- Hits:
- 143647
- john kennedy
- Report
GREAT PHONE . But could someone tell me , can you transfer photos for the phone to a PC , if so HOW?
- Reply
- 2003-08-08 15:55
- U
- Cheap
- Report
Cheap and low quality. No support if you get problems.
Ever tried to get other covers or a second akku or power supply ?? Poor !
- Reply
- 2003-08-08 15:55
- U
- cadaver
- Report
I'm love this phone! can anyone tell me where can I find the manual? thanks
- Reply
- 2003-08-05 21:36
- U
- haruna
- Report
to me its definately one of the best phones ever made, wish i had one...
- Reply
- 2003-08-05 08:44
- U
- danny
- Report
does anyone now anything about the sagem MYX-8, MYX-9, MYC-5w and MYC-5??????????????????????
- Reply
- 2003-08-03 18:42
- U
- diamondus
- Report
Thanks! :) Here in Hungary 3650 and My X-6 are cost the same. My friend bought it (My X-6 with pre-paid for 240 Euros), and it's awesome! The only thing what sucks is not the mistake of Sagem but the mistake of Vodafone: It uses the Live! menu so in his phone uses only 4 colours... Colours of Vodafone, and you can't change it!!! But the original software will be avaliable here in Hungarian from September. The camera has the most functions and the best quality of all phones avaliable now. 3650 is big, heavy, slow and it freezes all the time. It probably knows more than this (sure it does), but I'll ask you: do you really think the 3650 is better if you can't use it because it's broken down all the time and you have the 15th version of the software, and it's still bad? From smartphones you shold buy P800 or Sx-1 (I don1t know if it's avaliable or not...), not 3650! If you want to compare it to something you should think about wich one is better: SE T610 or this. They're know almost the same. My vote goes to MY X-6. (T610 costs 80 euros more than this here, the camera's bad, the sofware is full of bugs and it's a nightmare to synchronise it with a PC).
- Reply
- 2003-07-29 03:01
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
diamondus is a fuckin legend. hes right. you cant compare this phone to a 3650!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2003-07-25 15:05
- U
- L. Lemeke
- Report
i used sagem MW3020 for 1 year now and it's great. keep up the good work. i would really love to receive a catalogue showing all these phones clearly cos i like to change to a more improved version. pls also tell me how to purchase by debit order in the bank. my address: P.O. Box 13599, , Kingsway Str, Maseru 100, Lesotho, Southern Africa. thank you
- Reply
- 2003-07-24 22:03
- U
- price
- Report
Ít is a decision for at least 2 years. And if it is such a little difference... If in perhaps in 3 months i will regret the buy because i have saved 30 or 40 euros...
You are not buying it like bread and butter every day, so think before buying.
- Reply
- 2003-07-19 01:20
- U
- Maical
- Report
by the way, i;m comparing my options ... the phones i like ... i don't care about in what class they are in ... but i do care about the price !
- Reply
- 2003-07-17 05:00
- U
- Maical
- Report
220 euro? what country? france? that would be good for me because i;ll go sightseing there... but the price is with a minutes package or something like that? or just the phone?
- Reply
- 2003-07-17 04:57
- U
- wig
- Report
if they were the same price i would still get the sagem-so there.
- Reply
- 2003-07-17 03:28
- U
- Tone
- Report
Much more expansive ?? Wow.
I get a X6 for 220 Euros and a 3650 for 260 Euros. Beside the screen of the X6 has more colours, the 3650 has a lot more features and is in your own words another league :-))))
I don't think, that 40 Euros is such a big difference when you can play in an higher league.
So first inform yourself, then think and then write !!
- Reply
- 2003-07-16 00:40
- U
- diamondus
- Report
You want to compare this to 3650? You're an idiot. Not the same category and price. Anyway, no Nokia phone has now 65k screen and a built-in camera like that. Let's see: 7250 knows almost the same like that: colour screen, GPRS, MMS, infra red phone, built-in camera, but the really impotrant functions: camera, screen, MMS are much worse in the Nokia. And it looks digusting, and it's way much expensive than this. A Nokia costs a lot more than a better phone what is not a "big" brand. That's why Nokia sucks.
- Reply
- 2003-07-16 00:14
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed