Samsung A837 Rugby - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.7
- Features
-
6.7
- Performance
-
6.8
- Anonymous
- Report
its not as tough as they say. i dropped it on its hing and it broke. and if u dont have insurance, you are screwed.
- Reply
- 2009-11-03 22:33
- bcu6
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-03-05 17:42 from 55U7Yes, waterproof... tested in Alaskan silt rivers and a full dunk in a hot tub while connected to a call. Never even dropped the call. highly recommend.
- Reply
- 2009-10-21 02:32
- T6si
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-03-05 17:42 from 55U7Yes, waterproof... tested in Alaskan silt rivers and a full dunk in a hot tub while connected to a call. Never even dropped the call. highly recommend.
- Reply
- 2009-10-21 02:32
- T6si
- R
- strohs
- Report
nice phone but i was wondering why the time display isnt always visible on the front (or at least an option for this)also not very user friendly for texting although im getting better at it i had a razor before this one
- Reply
- 2009-08-05 17:34
- AfHc
- Q
- John Bledsoe
- Report
does not ring loud enough poor phone very very poor phone
- Reply
- 2009-04-05 04:01
- kNtG
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to cinabalu @ 2008-09-26 11:34 from wc6Brugby is 3g
- Reply
- 2008-12-03 02:23
- Rstx
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
This i think is a cool phone. Not one of those feature loaded power houses like the Nokia N-Series or Samsung's Ultra Collection. This is a pretty cool and durable phone for the everyday person. No Radio capabilities isn't that big a deal no one really uses that anyways. Something like this being equipped with GPS...its like it was designed for the outdoors man. Its a rugged enough phone for the ones who need it, but its still kinda reserved enough for the office. I really like this, which is odd because I'm more into the fragile feature loaded things like the Innov8.
- Reply
- 2008-10-01 05:58
- 47RE
- U
- cinabalu
- Report
something wrong whit this info.. see the picture mention got 3G service but in the specifications mention don have 3G... which is the correct info?
- Reply
- 2008-09-26 11:34
- wc6B
- U
- andry
- Report
very nice phone,
it has been certified with military standard MIL-STD-810F, so the phone will give another alternative to ruggedized-phone users.
btw, i heard that thil phone will be available at AT&T with pricetag less than USD200.
- Reply
- 2008-09-25 04:26
- tDxk
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Why is it called "Rugby"? Where's the secondary camera???????????
- Reply
- 2008-09-25 03:49
- 2GaM
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed