Samsung C170 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.0
- Features
-
6.9
- Performance
-
7.2
- chida
- Report
i need the settings of airtel in wap browser. i need the ip address.can i able to get
- Reply
- 2009-02-07 04:19
- vGk{
- Q
- sanju
- Report
samsung is good but the wap browser is not working properly. in the user book it should be given all details also for wap browser. i select airtel and even network works the settings didnt work
- Reply
- 2009-02-07 04:11
- vGk{
- U
- chidambaram
- Report
one of the worst set in samsung.i used wap browser for gprs it is not working. we cant able to download and i really wasted my money.service is important not the look think it and select.only beauty is samsung.beauty is danger ok
- Reply
- 2009-02-07 04:08
- vGk{
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
i can't ge the back to come off.. is there like a special ay to do it or what??
- Reply
- 2008-12-23 03:20
- wg9E
- U
- Emil
- Report
Does anyone know how to change the default message storage option from SIM to phone memory? The "memory status" shows that the phone can store 200 messages but it stores to the SIM by default (my SIM can only hold 20 messages).
- Reply
- 2008-11-27 21:44
- Sv6c
- Q
- ina
- Report
i have had this phone for almost a year and it works fine for me.battery is good,i only recharge once a week.
- Reply
- 2008-11-22 11:01
- mjPY
- H
- Lb
- Report
Not a bad phone when you're willing to accept the not too fast interface and the lack of option to enable T9 by default (suggestions more than welcome!). Besides that it's a cheap and simple phone, but you can at least edit the 'down' button to bind any option, which can be very useful to make up the lack of a 'new text' option at the main menu of the phone.
- Reply
- 2008-11-08 18:04
- mGyI
- H
- gpp
- Report
How do I turn the speaker volume down - It is so load !!!!!!!!!!!! - almost unuseable
- Reply
- 2008-11-05 10:32
- vugk
- Q
- andy
- Report
I don't understand all the positive reviews of this phone. This is undoubtedly the worst phone I have ever used. It looks good as a fashion accessory but doesn't actually work as a phone.
1) User interface is unintuitive
2) button presses slow to react often resulting in wrong selections in menus.
3) text messages are slow to send - need to switch to predictive text each time you write a message, too many confirmation messages before sending.
4) reception is absolutely dreadful - useless in emergency situations
5) Phone sound quality is poor, even in areas of good reception (i.e. right next to a transmitter). Voices are very harsh sounding.
If you want a basic phone that actually works, forget about looks and get the Nokia 1200.
- Reply
- 2008-11-04 20:20
- nEkx
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to tanvir @ 2008-10-22 19:01 from Pxxcare you mad to take this phone for downloding the file
- Reply
- 2008-11-01 10:28
- vGAc
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
I am really dissapointed in purchasing this handset. this handset doesnot even have a group SMS facility. please don't put your money in getting this handset.
- Reply
- 2008-10-31 10:20
- 2T1V
- U
- Pea
- Report
> In reply to Emil @ 2008-08-28 21:47 from Sv6cI am facing the same problem as well!
I wished there was some way of disabling the vibration when I set it to silent.
That'd be extremely battery-consuming!
Anyone? Any ideas??
- Reply
- 2008-10-31 04:14
- TIEh
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
i face a problem that..... whenever i try to download a file more than 1.5 KB from the wap browser, may it be a tone or a wallpaper, it shows an error "Bad Gateway"
Is it okay, or my phone has some problem??
- Reply
- 2008-10-30 17:30
- upe5
- U
- tanvir
- Report
I never thought Samsung mobile will be as slow as it..... My 1st mobile was Samsung X100.. that was really really nice.... So I became a fan of Samsung. But this mobile makes me dissatisfied
- Reply
- 2008-10-22 19:01
- Pxxc
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed