Samsung C300 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
0.1%
Total hits:
519247

Voting results

Design
7.7
Features
6.6
Performance
7.0
Votes:
1211


Sort by:

I Think that the memory idea is a good one perhaps 500 kb not 200? but with the screen being quite small already i don't think it would benefit from a size decrease. I also think the GPRS is quite important in a low end phone, if they're all the same price it needs to be able to compete with other models such as the moto W220.

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-30 17:54
  • MSRn
  • U

to Marcus

i do not agree with you.

i agree to remove GPRS, java, put a smaller screen 128x128 or less and reduce internal memory to 200k.

it would be more cheap.

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-26 17:12
  • Pjyf
  • U

Who else agrees that with an fm radio included this phone would be one of the best Low-enders ever?

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-24 21:16
  • MSRn
  • U

I own a Samsung X300, basically same functions as C300 but its a flip phone. Very good cheap designs!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-17 19:45
  • TqcV
  • U

SNOOZE FUNCTION: if you set the "Wake up call" alarm, it gives you the option of "snoozing" when the alarm goes off. The other alarms don't give you the snooze function.

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-15 04:46
  • kCaL
  • U

Hi all.
Anyone knows if the morning alarm sounds with the phone off? And if it has snooze function?
Thanks

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-11 00:27
  • S4rX
  • U

This is a really mobile >>>>> without camera >>>The camera is not necessary .

  • Reply
  • 2007-01-02 08:37
  • Saxx
  • U

nothing more than a bit changed copy of d600.

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-29 16:30
  • pueV
  • U

Is that phone in Egypt too? it looks amazing and wonderful design than my noika 6600 and i am not looking for any bluthooth or cameras.... this phone is awsome!!

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-19 16:15
  • Nhyh
  • U

Does it have USB cable included?

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-05 12:41
  • TmXh
  • U

what i liked about samsung is that they're respecting they'r customers..and not including in the phone price a camera or edge.lan etc..for people that are not using it.i have a 10mpx camera .a laptop a pda..i just wanna a simple PHONE..i don't need anything else..just a good batery life.a decent display(65-260k colors are OK)..i'm just wondering how much does it weight..because i don't want a "bulky" phone..bye all

posted from Germany

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-01 03:05
  • nD%v
  • U

No its just a low wnd phone with no cam

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-28 08:53
  • PSuf
  • U

Aww!!does this phone have a camera on it?:(

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-23 03:34
  • k6LE
  • U

this phone and the samsung X830 are the hottest phones i've seen so far!

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-23 03:30
  • k6LE
  • U

Hi, Samsung adopts good policy of marketing to have simple features in high class designs. Simple features...means... obviously cheap price... (like I have Samsung C130 quite cheap. Simple features with good design and phone book 1000 excellent. Only improvement in display and usb support for Sync.). Thxz..

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-16 22:53
  • PGhb
  • U

Hi, Samsung adopts good policy of marketing to have simple features in high class designs. Thxz..

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-16 22:13
  • PGhb
  • U

Yes people, please! post your comments, your are trully market connaisseurs, I can tell, ha ha.
Cheap phones market is a very interesting niche for every company, all the producers have models for this "niche".
It`s a phone for companies employees, for example. Organizer&handsfree is enough for the common employer. Since it lacks that many features, the battery life must be very good.
So, it looks ok, it`s cheap, the battery is fine. Sounds good to me!
For the Record, I own a Nokia 6230i and a Sony Ericsson T630i-both very good choices at their time; my next buy will be an Alcatel E 801 (in time I realised I don`t use camera, I don`t need LAN, Edge, Wlan, GPRS, and othe techology crap).
I post this for all of you hat are so quickly to judge a phone (and any product for that matter!) disregarding it`s TRU PURPOSE.


  • Reply
  • 2006-11-16 10:14
  • iKD8
  • U

this phone is going to be released maybe in camboja or serra leoa... its going to be so cheap becuz its too basic. 2mb internal memory??? not even a poor vga cam?? get moto v360 instead.

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-13 22:44
  • PjC1
  • U

Samsung c300 must be really cheap.My mom wont even buy this phone.People want
phones with cameras at least,look at the moto v360 camera + bluetooth.Its 2006 goin 4
2007 come on samsung you can do better.

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-12 14:15
  • N9@x
  • U
  • people jus dun under
  • Report
  • Rating0

sometimes, some people just dun understand y phone company wanna release a phone with virtually no function that can compete with nowadays technology. come on man! there r so many different social classes in this world. not all people r as rich as all rich people that can change phone every single day

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-08 16:53
  • TS{s
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 228 user reviews and opinions for Samsung C300.