Samsung C300 - user opinions and reviews

• adrian
• Report

Samsung c300 must be really cheap.My mom wont even buy this phone.People want
phones with cameras at least,look at the moto v360 camera + bluetooth.Its 2006 goin 4
2007 come on samsung you can do better.

• Reply
• 2006-11-12 14:15
• N9@x
• U

• people jus dun under
• Report

sometimes, some people just dun understand y phone company wanna release a phone with virtually no function that can compete with nowadays technology. come on man! there r so many different social classes in this world. not all people r as rich as all rich people that can change phone every single day

• Reply
• 2006-11-08 16:53
• TS{s
• U

• Ranjit
• Report

WHY!!! Samsung??? What happened to you.

• Reply
• 2006-11-06 06:50
• U278
• U

• Anonymous
• Report

this phone is a copy of what motorola did. they introdued the w220 as a cheaper version of v3 but without the camera. now samsung comes out with this slider phone but without a camera.

• Reply
• 2006-11-05 16:40
• PZti
• U

• Anonymous
• Report

maybe ther e are people out there who wants a slider phone with no camera! Alcatel has one.

• Reply
• 2006-11-05 16:25
• PZti
• U

• davethetekkie
• Report

fantastic!

In answer to the question 'is this still a phone'... go and crack yourself around the head with a frying pan... Bluetooth and cameras do not make a phone.

If this is priced at a point similar to the Nokia 2600 it could be a winner!

• Reply
• 2006-11-05 15:45
• I7Vt
• U

• ~*BRIDENCE*~
• Report

e370 wannabe lol, good for pre-paid maybe?

• Reply
• 2006-11-05 05:37
• RJdi
• U

• Marcus
• Report

If this is under £40 then i am SO buying it !!!

• Reply
• 2006-11-04 21:56
• MSRn
• U

• bobo
• Report

shame on you samsung!

• Reply
• 2006-11-04 13:15
• pqy3
• U

• Dingo
• Report

No camera, no bluetooth, only 2 MB,...Is it still a phone ?

• Reply
• 2006-11-04 02:40
• nK4L
• U