Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.5
- Features
-
7.1
- Performance
-
7.3
- MR
- Report
- 0
it is nice phone. i am using this phone from last 1 month. good battery backup , but VGA camera. and think it has good camera quality QQVGA. sound in head phones is awesome . and battery backup is also great .
But please help me from where i download the applications for this model, if any one knows then please reply
- Reply
- 2009-05-23 05:59
- wiTf
- U
- NOLAN
- Report
- 0
this is an exceptional fone!!!!! people who are looking for sumthing that will give you great value for your money, this is perfect for you!!!!! you are not going to regret buying this fone!!!
- Reply
- 2009-05-22 15:01
- NhpM
- H
- oliver
- Report
- 0
in Macedonia, with t-mobile prepad sim card(10 eur talk) is 63 eur.
- Reply
- 2009-05-22 07:47
- ptRR
- U
- Benrock22
- Report
- 0
As far as Pre-Paid handsets go, this is a good buy for AU$129. So what if it has a VGA camera? Yuo gey what you pay for! This handset has an expandable memory of up to 8GB!!! Also, it is easy to navigate and FUN to use!
- Reply
- 2009-05-20 09:30
- in%a
- H
- MODIFY
- Report
- 0
you guys are not fair, stop saying bad things about this phone cause other people like it. please fellow south africans.....
- Reply
- 2009-05-19 15:54
- GfQ$
- U
- serbian
- Report
- 0
Very nice phone, very good sound but low camera. Why they put old VGA camera in new phones?
- Reply
- 2009-05-14 23:28
- puxn
- C
- ssssssssshhhhhhh!!!
- Report
- 0
i love this phone its the bestest cell phone around it is supa dupa hot it is hot hot hot hot hot!!!!
- Reply
- 2009-05-14 19:10
- NhpM
- C
- demon_sneakers
- Report
- 0
What crap, why would anyone accept a VGA camera on a new phone, I'll stick to my W810i
- Reply
- 2009-05-14 13:45
- jxxW
- C
- b
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-04-28 04:15 from RBVF - click to readi think they made a mistake by taking out this phone. oooops
- Reply
- 2009-05-14 11:38
- N9sr
- R
- Juju
- Report
- 0
waouuh, I also been trapped by this phone. I am not surprised to watch unhappy people here.
On top of what has been said, this phone needs higher battery. I used the MP3 player couple of minutes and some short calls and I have to charge the battery each 2 days. Is it normal ? I dont think so.
The interface is very cheap as well.
I am OK that it is a low cost phone but for the same price you have better Samsung phones than that.
Is Samsung change their quality system to bring such phone on the market ?
- Reply
- 2009-05-12 01:29
- 0SkE
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
This phone is just a joke ! My girlfriend got it and the interface is so ugly. Even lower price Samsung phone have a better and fuild interface.
My quick feedback:
- Camera is very bad quality: indoor, outdoor, colors ...
- SD card access is very (very!!!) slow. I am wandering if Samsung dont have a problem here.
- USB access is very slow as well. I am not sure if it is really USB 2.0.
! Do not buy this phone ! It is very poor quality one...
- Reply
- 2009-05-02 22:40
- pfc1
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
i also got one, but not a big diffenence in camera quaility comparing with another fones in this price range.
i satisfy the design, mp3, bigdisply
btw, don't samsng have another colours of it?
- Reply
- 2009-04-28 04:15
- RBVF
- U
- Phoney
- Report
- 0
I recently bought this phone at a really good price but have to agree with other comments made from other reviews that the camera not great and found it hard to download from pc too.
- Reply
- 2009-04-24 17:27
- m7aj
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I just buy this phone and I am not fully satisfied.
Even considering his low price, the camera took crappy pictures (bad colors) even in outdoor. Downloading from the mobile to the PC took so much time (VGA pictures only!).
The user interface is a bit laggy as well.
I am pretty convinced that you can find better phones than this one. Samsung is used to do more and more quality products but tis time I am really wondering why it is so ...
I had the feeling to come back 4 years ago with Samsung phones.
Please try it before buy it.
- Reply
- 2009-04-23 13:18
- Fe1a
- U

