Samsung C6620 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
182691

Voting results

Design
6.4
Features
6.4
Performance
6.4
Votes:
14


Sort by:

Why this phone consuming very bad the power. When recharge it am using for only 30 mnts. Do you think what is the problem?

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-28 06:08
  • NwG%
  • Q

what's about the samsung c6620.

  • Reply
  • 2009-09-05 18:51
  • PF9f
  • R

> In reply to Han @ 2009-06-01 21:36 from mYpb - click to readWell, I found out how this works by accident, just press the red hang-up button for a second or two does the trick.

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-05 22:00
  • mYpb
  • R

Got this phone for about a week or so. I have a question about it. Is it possible to block the buttons on the phone? On my previous phone, a nokia, I could do this by pressing the select button followed by a '*'. That does not work. When carrying the phone in my pocket I have already phoned several people, without me noticing. Very annoying and ambarassing. I couldn't find this option in the manual, but I cannot immagine that samsung forgot this feature. Any help is appreceated!

Han.

  • Reply
  • 2009-06-01 21:36
  • mYpb
  • Q

20MB internal memory for Windows Mobile 6.1 ?????
Are you kidding...???

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-20 06:04
  • inZ7
  • U

how much rm..ax

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-19 08:03
  • ibfG
  • R

Price should be less USD200. Lowest internal memory, No camera Flash, No Radio, No Wifi. Nokia E63 has everything you need at USD250

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-15 05:08
  • symr
  • U

*hsdpa

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-12 19:29
  • pqZx
  • F

I could get this baby for cca 80 EUR. As I don't need WiFi (1GB/month internet traffic for free in my subscription plan - that's more than enough for my personal needs - and this phone has HDSPA, which is not present in E63 for example), this seems like a perfect choice for a budget smartphone.
Well done, Samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2009-03-12 19:26
  • pqZx
  • C

So professional, but without wi-fi??????
What is Samsung thinking about?

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-28 16:55
  • M3WZ
  • C

crappy phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-22 08:37
  • nDAQ
  • H

Business phone and no WiFi???!!!??!?!?!???!

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-21 19:30
  • nCby
  • C

A good alternative to Nokia E63 for those who prefer Window Mobile over Symbian.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-06 10:19
  • PZeb
  • U


It costs 199 Euro in Italy (MTV Special Edition).

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-27 16:09
  • M3Wx
  • U

wlan >>>>> no
can you believe that !!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-08 23:06
  • fvKH
  • U

it dosent have wifi hmmm

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-08 14:52
  • nCby
  • C

I dont think this will sell 1000 units!

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-07 11:44
  • PUZe
  • U

I Do like the looks of this phone...
The specs are not so impressive

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-07 09:20
  • iyCK
  • C

> In reply to Kal @ 2008-11-05 16:04 from vwdn - click to readI said is a copy of thr pantech slate because they seem to similar in external design, i never talk about features or specs, i know that this samsung is far better than the poor pantech....

So, if you want i will say things in other way.
Pantech slate is a copy of this samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-06 04:29
  • iBtv
  • R

> In reply to Wally @ 2008-11-05 06:27 from iBtv - click to readits damn insulting to even say it's a copy of pentech. That phone is not even a winmo. Have you seen Samsung i320 which was released in 2006?
here have a look : http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i320-1442.php

This is colorfull version of i320. And yes the coloring comes pretty close to Blackberry 8707v. but that's about it. Lets not say this a copy of this and that specially Nokia, as you should know blackjacks are there for quite a long time now. cheers

  • Reply
  • 2008-11-05 16:04
  • vwdn
  • R

Sort by:
Total of 29 user reviews and opinions for Samsung C6620.