Samsung D520

Samsung

Voting results

Design
8.2
Features
7.8
Performance
7.8
Votes:
1446
 Hits:
630475

General 2G Network GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
Announced 2006, February
Status Discontinued
Size Dimensions 101 x 46 x 15.9 mm
Weight 94 g
Display Type TFT, 256K colors
Size 176 x 220 pixels, 1.9 inches, 30 x 38 mm
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones
Speakerphone Yes, with stereo speakers
 - Dual speaker
Memory Phonebook 1000 entries, Photocall
Call records 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls
Internal 80 MB
Card slot No
Data GPRS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 - 48 kbps
HSCSD No
EDGE No
3G No
WLAN No
Bluetooth Yes, v1.2 with A2DP
Infrared port No
USB Yes
Camera Primary 1.3 MP, 1280x1024 pixels, LED flash
Video Yes, CIF
Secondary No
Features Messaging SMS, EMS, MMS, Email
Browser WAP 2.0/xHTML
Radio No
Games BobbyCarrot, AirShip Racing, ArchAngel, FreeKick + downloadable
Colors Black, Silver
GPS No
Java Yes, MIDP 2.0
 - MP3/MP4/AAC player
- T9
- SyncML
- Document viewer (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF)
- Organizer
- Voice memo
Battery   Standard battery, Li-Ion 800 mAh
Stand-by Up to 285 h
Talk time Up to 3 h

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

Samsung D520 - user opinions and reviews

  • Marcus

I've had my D520 for 2 years (yes 2 YEARS!) and I still love it. I usually get the urge for a new phone every now and again although the new Touch/Multifunction phones do nothing for me. And they are far to big! The D520 does everything you need...

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-28 05:53
  • tR9J
  • H
  • Mike Wells

I have had my D520 for 3 years and it still works perfect. So reliable. It will be difficult to replace if it ever stops from working.

  • Reply
  • 2009-05-26 21:30
  • mHkA
  • H
  • Lyn

Ahh, the D520 has been good to me. It's lasted a long 3-4 years or so and still functioning very well. It's only recently started to die a little (most likely because I dropped it a couple of times recently!) The sound quality for music is okay ...

  • Reply
  • 2009-04-01 05:06
  • iibM
  • H