Samsung D820 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Voting results

Design
8.3
Features
8.0
Performance
8.1
Votes:
4695
 Hits:
1382331

charles-manila,

samsung is not behind in terms of features, in fact samsung is way advance than other manufacturer in terms in features and design.

However, samsung will only launch thier advance,full rich featured phones to mature and advance markets like europe,korea, japan and north america. It sad to say that many cannot have samsung advance phones because they are of premium quality with premium price, but always craved for.



  • Reply
  • 2005-11-14 02:32
  • PU2H
  • U

i notice that almost all of samsung fone has no Radio. And why they’re coming out latest phones that only has 1.3 MP camera instead of 2MP. Samsung is excellent in terms of designs. but in features they’re just behind nokia and SE.

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-14 01:44
  • RKpH
  • U

for those whiging about this phone not having a external memory slot
read throughfly and not advertise your ignorance.

microSD (TransFlash)
what do you think its for then??

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-13 20:41
  • y%ZN
  • U

they try to make it look sharp and roundny -BAD!

im sure TMobile would buy this fone

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-13 02:44
  • 4T1p
  • U

Please launch this thinnest slider phone in the world which almost half the thickness of the existing slider phone in the market.

Amazing and a breakthrough in phone design with megapixel camera, big sized screen and many multimedia functions. The one and only.

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-12 16:49
  • P@1G
  • U

plz dont launch this phone it is a total loss........ thih phone has got sharp edges no one will but this .........dont launch

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-12 11:22
  • PAki
  • U

samsung phones are getting annoying.no new features.same old same old.all the phones got same features.the one fone wil hav bluetooth and the other wont.the one will have 1mp camera.the other will have 1.mpcamera.u guys are just changing the design of phones.and enuf with the e700 look.ppl are tired of that look.et better designs.we all know dat nokia phones are getting uglier by the day.but u guys need to make new designs.u got the style waht ppl want but not the same style.get symbian also.its about time




  • Reply
  • 2005-11-12 09:38
  • Nxsf
  • U

They are getting a T809. It is locked to T-Mobile, this phone is not.

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-12 09:10
  • 4LjZ
  • U

tmobile us is getting this real soon =o)

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-12 07:10
  • jSs{
  • U

is this phone 3g? from the pics it looks like it has a camera on the front face too...??? :)

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-12 01:53
  • BCp%
  • U

if i was samsung owner i would fire all designers. what are they doing people should move on. look at this ugly design. i think in the histroy of samsung D600 is unique

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-12 01:38
  • 4Y73
  • U

Hei All!! Dont you get it? Many have complained Nokia for bad design or something like that but
the truth is that NOKIA is The Worlds BEST mobilephone manufacturer. LOOK THE FEATURES!!!

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-11 20:04
  • ntga
  • U

ss_lover, read carefully. There is a tranflash slot. Too bad it doesn't have flash though

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-11 07:09
  • k2KE
  • U

First of all,....the phone has an external card slot..........and 1.3 megapixels is efficient for a phone.......if you want a good camera why not just buy a camera? Why do u need more than 1.3 megapixel on a phone, if you are such a photo fanatic go buy urself a 10MP camera

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-11 05:15
  • keDQ
  • U

I don't get why on earth they don't have external memory!!?? I'ts one of Samsungs weaknesses.

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-11 03:25
  • i2FH
  • U

the best phone of 2005, samsung d600
+ moto razr
= samsung d820!!!

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-11 01:19
  • 49sy
  • U

Here's what I don't understand.

Two new slim phones from Samsung, right. One of them (the D800) looks prettier and (forgetting the fact that it's only a 1.3MP cam) gets a flash.

The other (D800) gets a swivelling camera, TV Output, but no bloody flash, as well as putting on a couple of grammes - albeit very few.

It seems as if Samsung want to see whether we'd rather pick Pamela Anderson, or her intelligent but ugly big-sister, in mobile phone terms.

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-10 14:14
  • Tj%x
  • U

This phone is massive.. but thin!

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-10 05:31
  • U2TG
  • U

againn no external memory???!! dun they learned?!!!

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-09 23:48
  • PGHn
  • U

I think it`s a grat phone not only for the camera and everything else and for that u can use it in Europe and North America

  • Reply
  • 2005-11-09 19:05
  • mF2X
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.