Samsung F480 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
13%
Total hits:
3824245

Voting results

Design
8.5
Features
8.2
Performance
8.2
Votes:
12302

it just looks alike LG PRADA

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-19 20:48
  • 0xMI
  • U

Not everyone is looking for every feature under the sun in a phone, some people just want a phone! If Samsung put every feature possible in a phone they would only need to sell one phone, but different people have different needs, hence a range of different phones.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-19 10:15
  • nENN
  • U

Hey people...I think you guys need to change your opinion of things.
iPod touch has wi-fi, and it's not so exciting. Tiny screen, and you have to keep zooming a stuff to get a clearer and/or better view. I mean seriously, if you need wi-fi, get a desktop. The screen is at least 5 times larger. Plus you get a full size keyboard.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-18 03:42
  • F4pr
  • U

lg viewty copy

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-18 02:16
  • q}v4
  • U

use d compare option and compare it 2 d prada and ull see this is a massive copycat, and that d prada is a bit nicer. Compare them ull see!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-18 00:35
  • myM}
  • U

i would have to disagree i think it's much better looking than the prada

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-18 00:20
  • 07yQ
  • U

no standard os means very limited flexibility. couple that with samsung's apparent hate of wifi and you you have a 'why bother'er on your hands.
i expect to see this only in the hands of fashion freaks who don't give a rats ass about technical specs.
oh yeah, for a screen this large, the pixel count could have been higher.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-17 21:30
  • 0U72
  • U

no wlan?? what were they thinking?!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-17 17:40
  • TIE7
  • U

just another featureless clone

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-17 03:47
  • j$M9
  • U

i love the phone .and i wont to get 1 but i cant get it yet?why

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-16 19:26
  • kPhQ
  • U

A definate copy cat of the LG Prada phone, but much wider & less good looking!!

Thumbs down for Samsung...

...What a shame!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-15 20:14
  • TRZ3
  • U

this is a very good looking set but i think as it is a touch screen set this is a problem for me. so if the set have the option without touch screen, i will consider then

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-15 10:05
  • Pxxd
  • U

phone that looked this good should have wi-fi. i think this is just for fashionistas.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-15 03:56
  • wYIu
  • U

This phone, and its brother the f490, have left me confused. With both we are told they dont have autofocus, and then when GSMarena write up the stats, they do?!
So would someone who was perhaps at the show in barcelona tell me if it has autofocus or not?
Many thanks, since it is such a gorgeous phone!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-14 11:41
  • m5KE
  • U

this is totaly a coppy ofr motorola's 765423 touch screen

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-14 03:58
  • 4k3V
  • U

nah, viewty is better:
viewty has fm radio this- none
viewty has divx player dis- none
viewty has 120fps dis- 30fps
viewty has 240* 400 dis- 240*320
viewty has 3" screen dis- 2.8
viewty has ati redeye dis- none
dis is still a nice phone though.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-13 19:49
  • myM}
  • U

looks better then prada, and is going to be better then prada. it will match right up with the viewty though.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-13 18:16
  • jm4E
  • U

Wow, cant wait.

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-13 05:50
  • G5jg
  • U

gREAt!!! but i know this is quite expensive but it's ok !!!! hahahahah!!!!! gud news!!! loking forward to have this on my bare hand....

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-13 04:59
  • vpcc
  • U

Looks so much better then Prada and all other touch screen phones.. Im gonna get this one!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-12 21:21
  • ML%X
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.