Samsung F700 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
1.4%
Total hits:
1555222

Voting results

Design
8.4
Features
8.2
Performance
8.2
Votes:
6679

qwerty and touchscreen? yum!!

i'll take this over iphone in a heartbeat!


  • Reply
  • 2007-02-10 03:51
  • 49KW
  • U

Does this mobile have wireless service....

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-10 03:29
  • jBN$
  • U

Well, yeah. Looks awesome, but the things I am worried about:
1) Only 256k colours. Top class phones have 16M.
2) the touch sensitive screen. Well, I own a Samsung E900, which only have couple of those buttons. And the technology needs improvement cause every now and then my finger touches accidentally something, and all stuff is gone. But that's only a few buttons - but if you have the whole screen full of different buttons. I really doubt it'll work. It's the same with the iPhone. I have my doubts!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-10 02:49
  • 4sjB
  • U

Would be more awesome if it had an internal flash for the camera and a WiFi connection.

But it's already awesome enough for CONSUMERS. 5MP camera, HSDPA, EDGE (according to Engadget), a nifty MacBook-looking keypad and it's touchscreen. If you're bashing this phone: suck it up and get over it. You can't have a perfect phone forever.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-10 02:26
  • kDEf
  • U

i cannot get over this..why a 5 megapixel ,autofocuss camera with no flah..this will be probably a cheap phone 4-500 $..

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-10 02:13
  • mska
  • U

this phone will never compete in BUSINESS class..!!NOT even in multimedia ..5mpx with NO FLASH,probably pourr video 176x12..disapointment..and why they put the keybooard if it's allready a touchscreen..,it wouid had been lighter without that keybord,more stylish..etc..only 5mpx camera.WITHOUT A FLASH-i'm not even askin' for a XENON FLASH OR A STROBE..or anything decent..atleast a LED...and that doesn't meen that will be a good camera.if it has 5mpi'm curious how good the autofocus will be...another disapontment is the 260k..in comparison to new age phone that come out with 16mil..if this phone will be an expensive phone..nobody will buy this piece of crap..

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-10 02:08
  • mska
  • U

need wifi in it then i would buy it otherwise it is incomplete for use as a business phone which is the market i believe you are after.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-10 00:25
  • SkEn
  • U

great looking phone and great features especialy 5 m camera,but no 850 band,that can be very important depending on where you are or where you live.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 23:59
  • kCNa
  • U

not, NEVER, it isnt a iPhone clone since Apple DIDN'T CAME FIRST with the idea of that kind of touchscreen phone.

another brands like Motorola, Qtek and Benq had already made phones with that concept.

apple fanboys make me sick. good job samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 22:01
  • PjC5
  • U

This one has everything specially with 5mp cam that's something...and the style isn't bad looking but definitely not an Iphone clone it's original, and with qwerty pad, can't wait.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 20:10
  • kxMH
  • U

Oh... I love it, I would get this one over the Iphone full keyboard always useful for me since I'm using Treo, but it's a little bold, do you guys know when this release in US?

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 20:05
  • kxMH
  • U

no wifi,samsung go back to the drawing board.....nice phone!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 19:32
  • 4Hih
  • U

No wLAN ?! Than no thanks!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 19:28
  • nuCM
  • U

very nice phone!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 19:08
  • prPj
  • U

this is the 3rd 5mp phone that came out in the gsm market. we are all forgetting the LG kG920

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 18:30
  • jBK3
  • U

ownage!!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 16:49
  • vjXs
  • U

No wifi and its only triband...this phone is fairly worthless to any american consumer.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 15:23
  • xUJZ
  • U

Great phone, but where's the wifi? It seems to have everything else.

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 15:13
  • 2CAS
  • U

yes!! i'm first!!

and good phone

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 14:41
  • Tqj0
  • U

Half decent design but very little functionality. SGH rarely gets the form and function down right

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-09 14:06
  • kiM6
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.