Samsung G600 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
8.3
- Features
-
8.3
- Performance
-
8.3
- Votes:
- 9710
- Hits:
- 1442562
- DaveTheTekkie
- Report
Another example of what Samsung do well... a decent 2.5G handset without an operating system giving you the specs of so-called 'high end' models like the Nokia N95 without the compromise in stability and usability for calls. Also bearing in mind that Samsung are the MASTER in moving form factor handsets; why did flip phones become iconic? Samsung A300. Why did sliders become popular? Samsung D500... sure the D500 wasn't the first, but it was the first really popular one (before people remind me of the Siemens S55)... and the G600 is the next step... the design is like the E900 without the downside of the touch sensitive keypad...
Just FYI... the Z series are not Samsung's only 3G range... U700 sound familliar?
Cheers.
Dave.
- Reply
- 2007-07-25 11:49
- SHYw
- U
- dave_vl
- Report
It's a LIGHT SENSOR, not a front camera! G800 will have 3G (HSDPA) and a front camera and will be released in octomber/november.
- Reply
- 2007-07-25 10:23
- nDL4
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Why in specifications say the G600 hasn't 3G, but it have a camera in frontside of phone?
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 23:04
- niJd
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
@Bobble, this is not nokia which offers many features but really pain to use not to mention the degrading speed of the phone to process, anytime for 6 months to 1 year of use of nokia phones.
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 17:32
- P@1G
- U
- Bobble
- Report
Many features, but such a pain to use. Samsung engineers seem not to use their phones.
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 16:58
- ijvk
- U
- a.b.c. gum
- Report
to Farhan:
How the hell are you gonna tell samsung that they suck, i wanna see you create a phone thats bests the competition. Don't be going around saying that one of the largest multi-billion dollar company sucks, you probably make 5 cents a day you poor man.
this phone rocks
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 15:04
- MaM9
- U
- Martin
- Report
I have had Nokia all my life, but my last 4 phones has been Samsung, i have never had a problem with the phones, and they look much better than Sony/ericson and Nokia.
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 10:39
- T30V
- U
- joe
- Report
wow, this is the sexiest slider ever! this is exactly what i need!
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 08:01
- 49KZ
- U
- fanatics
- Report
I agree, N95 may have many features but it cannot compete with samsung in terms of multimedia specially mobile TVs and mobile videos. My 1.3 megapixel Samsung D820 has way above quality videos compared to Nokia N80 which has a 3.2 megapixel camera.Many users are now looking into video quality as a feature in mobile phone. Photo quality is just an ordinary feature now a days and it is now a thing of the past, well most probably.
SE obviously cannot compete both with SAMSUNG and NOKIA in terms of video. The highest SE achieved was QVGA and most of thier phones has QCIF videos which is pathetic.
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 04:51
- vpY}
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
This phone is much better than the nokia n95 and much better than the sony.
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 01:56
- wsG{
- U
- nitesmoke
- Report
hsdpa and better batery life would make me get this phone. but it doesnt have it oh well
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 01:52
- 4fvu
- U
- Sammy
- Report
how did te manage to squeeze a 5mp into that. by the way the SE k850 is way better. it has the US 3g bands
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 00:34
- n9Dc
- U
- omair
- Report
no doubt samsung has the best video and camera quality..and nokia and SE can't compete with its camera qualtiy..i swear.
- Reply
- 2007-07-23 19:42
- PEnh
- U
- Simon
- Report
Living in dark and dreary england, you really need a proper xenon flash to make full use of 5megapixel camera. shame.
- Reply
- 2007-07-23 19:28
- m9Fa
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed