Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
11%
Total hits:
7542791

Voting results

Design
6.8
Features
6.9
Performance
6.9
Votes:
214

Sort by:

Support temple run? I'll only buy if it does :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 14:11
  • Qxpq
  • U

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 is a good phone, because its work on Android 4.2,Jelly bean

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 11:40
  • Hkqm
  • C

> In reply to X D Cruze @ 2013-06-28 18:39 from XuI2 - click to readHi i'm not overlooking...Xperia L is around Rs.16k and i don't think Sony will price Xperia M more than that...and Galaxy Fame is at Rs.11k and Galaxy Core is Rs.15k and surely Samsung don't want to mess with these phones so Ace 3 will be priced around Rs.12.5k to13.5k(i think it's the same price range of first gen Ace, when it's launched)...if my assumptions are correct then i don't think Ace 3 will be 'much lower' than XM...but let's wait bro, it will be good if it's priced much lower for us, the customers right?

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-29 01:15
  • Xu}H
  • R

> In reply to The Stranger @ 2013-06-28 10:06 from Xu%k - click to readIt,s true that Sony's Xperia M is better than Galaxy Ace 3, but don't overlook the price. Galaxy Ace 3 will be priced much lower than Xperia M.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-28 18:39
  • XuI2
  • R

> In reply to Manikandan @ 2013-06-28 11:41 from vIf{ - click to readHa ha, dude it must be the price of first gen 'Ace' not 'Ace 3'...or you must have seen some con website...

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-28 17:28
  • Xu%7
  • R

In website its mentioned Rs.8529/- in india.. for this price its a very good phone.. waiting for the launch...

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-28 11:41
  • vIf{
  • U

> In reply to Ricky @ 2013-06-27 15:13 from Xuun - click to readXperia M is far better than this phone...XM has Krait Cores(almost Cortex A15 class) which is more efficient than Broadcom's Cortex A9 based cores in Ace 3 and XM's Adreno 305 GPU is more powerful than VideoCore IV GPU in Ace 3...and i can give some more reasons like little more pixel density, bigger battery, looks way better than Ace 3(in my opinion)...now it's all about pricing...if Sony prices it correctly it can easily beat the competition...

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-28 10:06
  • Xu%k
  • R

> In reply to jzac @ 2013-06-21 16:19 from terR - click to readActually I'm big Nokia fan.......but don't think wp8 wouldn't lag......i have a Lumia 520 ...and it's not totally lag free...but of course it's much better than my previous galaxy s duos

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-28 05:31
  • U@bx
  • R

no gpu spec

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-27 23:10
  • ftVi
  • U

Friends, Please tell me the price of sumsung glaxy ace 3G & LTE. :|

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-27 21:18
  • t}Af
  • U

> In reply to Ricky @ 2013-06-27 15:13 from Xuun - click to readXperia M is far better than this phone...XM has Krait Cores(almost Cortex A15 class) which is more efficient than Broadcom's Cortex A9 based cores in Ace 3 and XM's Adreno 305 GPU is more powerful than VideoCore IV GPU in Ace 3...and i can give some more reasons like little more pixel density, bigger battery, looks way better than Ace 3(in my opinion)...now it's all about pricing...if Sony prices it correctly it can easily beat the competition...

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-27 18:38
  • Xu}V
  • R

Nice phone with good spcification spcially for ram .Now sony xp M and smsung galaxy are the same conf.But what the price of dis phn would be around 17+ k.
Nokia lumia 720 vs samsung ace 3 vs xperia M. :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-27 15:13
  • Xuun
  • C

How is its battery backup ?

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-26 04:35
  • Hkq4
  • U

very gud...the build quality of dis device is gud,i think we would get a solid feel if we hold this device,i think dis would b around 15000 in india,wt bt the lte version?

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-26 03:21
  • utMU
  • U

> In reply to Anshul @ 2013-06-24 07:14 from ut0H - click to readphone is good but inbuild memory is not good

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-25 10:23
  • Mf5j
  • R

what about the mini 3?

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-25 00:02
  • PF5p
  • Q

Samsung galaxy "ace" name is quite popular among budget buyers. That will be a good place to start for ace 3. Though sony xperia M looks like a definitive winner in the race.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-24 15:29
  • 7j@y
  • U

Samsung galaxy core is priced 15k. By the time galaxy ace 3 is available, galaxy core should settle around 14k. I think initially ace 3 would be priced lower then galaxy core i.e. 13k.

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-24 07:14
  • ut0H
  • U

> In reply to Bezbel @ 2013-06-23 19:27 from srpx - click to readthough s3 mini has same features as this and cheaper than this, i highly believe this would have a better battery life than s3 mini..

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-24 03:03
  • iwpB
  • R

s3 mini has the same specs and its cheaper than this

  • Reply
  • 2013-06-23 19:27
  • srpx
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 1319 user reviews and opinions for Samsung Galaxy Ace 3.