Good look with good specs. I would like to buy it. If this design looks like iphone4 then dosen't matter. Atleast people who can't afford more money can have a thought atleast they have owned some good mobile.
n front camera is not a big deal..
companies dont give a shit to that..
who makes a video call 4m fone?????
u hv a 15" laptop 4 dat :P
no one is interested in offering front camera :)
why always iphone centric..
they could copy wave design which is better.
why samsung why?
Too bad it uses the ARM11 based msm7227. The rumored XPERIA X10 mini pro2 has a Cortex-A8 based msm7230.
No gingerbread but touchWiz UI make this phone a fail :(
Why dont any manufacturer get we want the latest version of Android. give us 2.3 as standard !
looks nice, great specs! a well-balanced low-cost android phone but come on samsung the design is like such a rip off of iphone4.. well i guess at least it looks nice. if it is priced well this beast will definitely do well in the markets
lol this if almost i copy of a iPhone design...but still i would like to buy this phone! specs are very cool and i hope the price will be at least the half of the Samsung Galaxy S...:\
Y nt samsung is adding secondary camera to all these models...It would have been excellent if they had secondary camera to all these models. Hope they will introduce this option to the mid range models also.
It looks like a successor to Spica (i5700) but it only brings a 3,5 inch (but low res) screen and a camera flash. Is it worth the chance? I think TouchWizFail takes care of the decision - at least for me. And the fact that the looks and dimensions are too close to the Iphone 4 which is ugly imo. Why Samsung, Why?
[deleted post]If that info is correct, then this is the new low to mid range champion phone.
Good phone but Samsung has really got to improve on their phone designs
Anonymous, 16 Jan 2011also hsdpa 7.2mbps, vga secondary camxcuse Me frnd !!!!is there secondary camera available in this phone