Apple iPhone 5 review: Laws of attraction
Samsung Galaxy S III vs. Note II: Sizing upSamsung Galaxy Camera GC100 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.1
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.2
- nicoceapi
- Report
- 0
Increible, the most increible phone I ´ve ever has. Hiper recomendable. bye bye Iphone...
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 15:06
- 9xc7
- U
- django
- Report
- 0
battery 1650 mah??!!!!!ok...good luck for those who bought this device...:)
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 12:07
- wHT4
- C
- Syed
- Report
- 0
Guys this is worst phone, it says that it has quad core..bt this phone acts like a single core.and this camera clearity is not good as S3
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 06:18
- U{Wr
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I think the battery capacity will be too small for the features...
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 03:30
- PA8x
- U
- deep
- Report
- 0
nice but u compare with nokia Pure View,samsung galaxy camera it's size was so big ,like wise heavy phone......but allover its nice.
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 02:56
- uCr$
- U
- Ankit
- Report
- 0
Please add Phone Features as well in this design..This will gonna rock Market!!
- Reply
- 2012-11-28 10:08
- PGjX
- F
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Sam4 @ 2012-11-27 03:32 from qLyf - click to readYou're right nokia 808 is better PHONE but galaxy camera isn't a phone. . .it's not voice call unable. . It's actualy a camera having android os for better experience. . If you've compared the quality. . .then i must tell you one thing processing time of 5mp image (oversampled) is less in 808 . .try taking images in 38mp (so called 41mp) and then calculate the speed. .
Lose less zoom in 808 will give you 8x digital zoom (and the image will not be oversampled) but you can get 21x optical zoom in glx cam way better than loseless, and after all it's worth comparing a phone with smartcamera!!
You are not wrong but. . Ppl using 808 won't get 21x goodness , pop up xenon and much more software goodies. . .
- Reply
- 2012-11-27 09:01
- 9IJ1
- R
- Ugh
- Report
- 0
What is the point of buying this phone without GPRS on the go? Wifi are not available in the train.
- Reply
- 2012-11-27 08:49
- PGwZ
- U
- Sam4
- Report
- 0
> In reply to zafnath @ 2012-11-26 10:29 from 3prb - click to readNot really, the Nokia 808 is a lot better than this. I've already compared them. The Nokia processes the photos a lot faster and a bulky phone? This is alot heavier and bulkier than the 808.
- Reply
- 2012-11-27 03:32
- qLyf
- R
- naughty
- Report
- 0
i'm very dispointed, iithis must be gsm enabled why samsung made like this
- Reply
- 2012-11-27 02:38
- iwpx
- U
- zafnath
- Report
- 0
I'd prefer this one over to Nokia 808 PureView. This one has a quad core and 1GB of RAM while 808 is a single core with maybe 512MB. So instead of buying a bulky phone with 41MP that I wouldn't use not to shorten CPU life, I'd get an android camera with 16MP, optical zoom and a quad-core well capable of any kind of processing - imaging, gaming, wtv. Plus its 3G connectivity would be just perfect to use my mobile flat plan net SIM card with it!
I just wonder how much can the battery endure... Wish it was like Moto's Razr Maxx!
- Reply
- 2012-11-26 10:29
- 3prb
- U
- apol
- Report
- 0
> In reply to sham @ 2012-11-18 03:29 from 39D@ - click to readmuch better if you type your message on an iphone5 or 4s, this is really the best one for you, just come on with the no 1.
- Reply
- 2012-11-26 09:43
- uSN$
- U
- i HATER
- Report
- 0
> In reply to AndroideMexDotCom @ 2012-11-17 03:41 from LvSY - click to readdoes this support voice calling?? specs says it doesnt support gsm voice communication...
- Reply
- 2012-11-25 14:44
- U{7x
- R
- kazanixm
- Report
- 0
if for snapping pictures just for fun this is the right camera for it but if you guys are really into pictures quality...i would say find a realy digital camera or DSLR of some sort...but this is a great innovation from samsung. At least they tried something new for digital camera category.
- Reply
- 2012-11-22 00:54
- TKHj
- U
Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up