Samsung Galaxy Camera GC100 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
5.0%
Total hits:
2316138

Voting results

Design
7.3
Features
7.4
Performance
7.3
Votes:
151


Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-02 01:26 from K1Ij - click to readTotally agree with you!
Plus Nokia PV is using Carl Zeiss lens and this galaxy camera is just using samsung lense which is not as good.
You will need to pay extra to use data for this cam, else no point having android as os.
The price will not be any cheaper than pv too.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-02 04:15
  • u{Ea
  • R

samsung have really lost it with this...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-02 03:23
  • 2CEm
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readnope it wouldnt be,, the nokia pureview has a way bigger sensor and apreature, so sorry it is a bit of a gimmickk to trick people...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-02 03:22
  • 2CEm
  • R

> In reply to sriabhi @ 2012-09-01 06:47 from XukX - click to readnokia 808 pv battery life - 34 hours vs galaxy camera battery life - 6 hours

android jellybean? Quad cores? Large hd screen? What for when u only have a couple of hours of juice. Then it will just be dead weight in your pocket. And you still have to carry a phone. Nokia 808 is much more practical

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-02 01:26
  • K1Ij
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-01 15:56 from K7gZ - click to readnokia 808 pv sensor - 1/1.2" vs galaxy camera sensor 1/2.3"

nokia has double the size of samsung sensor. In fact the sensor in nokia is larger than most compact cameras. So who's stupid now?

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-02 01:18
  • K1Ij
  • R

nokia 808 pv sensor - 1/1.2" vs galaxy camera sensor 1/2.3"

nokia 808 pv battery life - 34 hours vs galaxy camera battery life - 6 hours

enough said.. Nokia has done better with the 808 pv.. Galaxy camera will just go down the drain just like the 1st galaxy beam

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-02 01:12
  • K1Ij
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-01 15:56 from K7gZ - click to readbut 41 megapixel take high Quality picture. you see more detail then 16 mp but 16 mp not bad i guess but i lov Samsung camera.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-02 00:22
  • 49xm
  • R

no other mobile cam in this world or any other world out there can beat nokia 808.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 21:59
  • uNVC
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readThe camera yes, it should be, it has way bigger lens and sensor

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 20:30
  • 39nc
  • R

> In reply to mukesh @ 2012-08-31 19:14 from vGc6 - click to readIt's not a phone.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 19:57
  • uNVK
  • R

it is not a phone. But it is the best Camera with galaxy player.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 19:39
  • syrU
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-01 15:56 from K7gZ - click to readWell said... I don't have Nokia Pure View, but one of my friend bought it a few days ago. I say it is a good try from Nokia, but not the best!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 17:54
  • 7tU3
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readWhen you compare the camera definitely. But it doesn't have voice call facility like Nokia Pure View. So, If you need a voice call facility, better to go with Nokia Pure View.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 17:51
  • 7tU3
  • R

very ugly . but usefull

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 17:47
  • Iw}b
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-01 17:09 from P@1G - click to readI would rather prefer a Digicam running Android

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 17:25
  • P$uD
  • R

This is not a phone, its says on the the top Voice communication not supported

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 17:19
  • S35r
  • U

Wow.. A great innovation! But i will be scared to keep the phone in my pocket for fear of smashing the lens (if the camera button gets pressed accidentally). Hope Samsung will provide a Case with the phone like with other normal cameras.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 17:12
  • P$uD
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-01 15:56 from K7gZ - click to readNah!dnt just compare cameras on their sensor,the higher the pixels the sharper the image,imagine 41mp vs 16mp!yuck.!samsung

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 17:09
  • P@1G
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readIt's 16mp camera is fake poor than Nokia 808 pureview 41mp resolution.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 16:08
  • XueM
  • C

> In reply to Mark13 @ 2012-09-01 13:51 from wY5C - click to readdon't just compare cameras with megapixels, you're just making yourself look stupid, image sensors is one of the basis of a good camera, camera on cellphones will never beat a digicam unless the phone is equipped with large sensor witch is almost impossible because camera on phones are just extra features...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 15:56
  • K7gZ
  • R

Sort by:
Total of 838 user reviews and opinions for Samsung Galaxy Camera GC100.