Samsung Galaxy Camera GC100 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
0.8%
Total hits:
3008155

Voting results

Design
7.3
Features
7.5
Performance
7.3
Votes:
163

Sort by:

> In reply to Phantomhive @ 2012-09-05 08:04 from t7{H - click to readDude you should know what you are speaking..
lossless zoom is like in pureview where in even digital zoom, there is no loss of quality..
but anyways if sensor is small as in Galaxy Camera, there will be loss of a bit quality even in optical zooM!!
and you know what.. next time you open your mouth, you better think twice!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-07 06:39
  • utmT
  • R

Just add SIM card slot to this and it would be great phone with great camera. Just think about it

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-06 21:08
  • S35r
  • R

Samsung Should have release such type of phone. Why not just add the SIM card place to this camera, so it can be used as phone too.
I hope Samsung will thik about it and release such phone with great camera quality

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-06 21:07
  • S35r
  • C

you must use cover for lens otherwise it must be flopped because if the lens is uncovered then result must be affected

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-06 18:44
  • KIIS
  • U

isn't this a camera?

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-05 17:19
  • 4@9X
  • U

> In reply to Phantomhive @ 2012-09-05 08:04 from t7{H - click to readI don't agree with you when you say PV have bad quality image at max resolution.
Have you personally tried it before?
Even reviews in GSM Arena have said that PV have great quality image even in full resolution.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-05 08:23
  • wiXc
  • R

> In reply to Klaudio @ 2012-09-03 00:02 from 0ZJM - click to readYour wrong about that. Optical zoom don't loss quality while zooming. Make sure you know what your saying. Unlike digital zoom, the lens itself is the one that focus. Not like in digital zoom where in the picture will be crop to enlarge it. This camera has built in effects to enhance picture. Check out the demo. I seen it on another site. You can take pictures with a quality like the one who took the picture is a pro. You can zoom it at its max without losing any quality. And unlike the Pure View, you can take high quality pictures at max resolution. Pure View has bad pics when you take it at the max resolution.
And don't just judge it without seeing the sample pics and reviews. You'll be astonished when you see its samples.

I also don't like this at first but seeing the samples change my mind. The reason it is quad core is because of its effects and filter in the camera app. It can put effects and filter at the same time in just a second.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-05 08:04
  • t7{H
  • R

read carefully, its 3g camera phone, or 4g, not gsm

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-05 07:05
  • 9E27
  • R

yz

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-05 06:40
  • tUdx
  • F

i agreed its not phone becz its spec there is no 2g or 3g network.its first android based camera phone.those peoples are stupid who compare 808 pure.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-05 00:55
  • sUvT
  • U

It´s not a phone its just a camera with an android application

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-04 13:44
  • P$cP
  • U

i hope it had a secondary Camera for video calls (skype , yahoo )

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-04 12:01
  • ITES
  • U

But the only problem is that it is just a camera, not a camera phone

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-04 06:39
  • sUwD
  • U

> In reply to Jason @ 2012-09-03 09:53 from wiXc - click to readCorrect. Android powered? How much more useless can it be? Why not spend all that resources on developing a higher quality camera? I have read an article about android powered camera playing angry birds and go on facebook blah blah blah... Why not just get a smartphone? Doing those things on the camera only makes one looks dumb in front of others. Some might say its for portability reasons, but Hey! Everyone carries cell phones around.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 22:19
  • qMxY
  • R

why can't samsung name their products differently? galaxy camera? they have enough money to be more creative than this.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 19:15
  • wMHH
  • U

see specifications again and then write!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 18:48
  • U@Rf
  • R

I really love it's design ! but the quality, Nokia pv might be much more better...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 15:31
  • PWaa
  • U

wn tr is no sim slot inside it.. tn what is the use of Wi-Fi hotspot inside it..???? no need of this app

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 12:01
  • YM0x
  • Q

Why not Bluetooth?...........Samsung Digital Camera needs Bluetooth also.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 11:49
  • u{Jb
  • C

Is this camera really LTE compatible in Europe, USA or just in South Korea. Korean operators are using their own 4G LTE bandwidth(s) which can cause problems at least in Europe.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 10:41
  • xhq0
  • Q
Sort by:
Total of 908 user reviews and opinions for Samsung Galaxy Camera GC100.