Samsung Galaxy Camera GC100 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
5.0%
Total hits:
2311719

Voting results

Design
7.3
Features
7.4
Performance
7.3
Votes:
151


Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readof course it is better, it's a "digicam" with a larger image sensor than nokia's tiny sensor...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 15:49
  • K7gZ
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readYes, because this is more of a camera than a phone. Optical zoom, better flash. It most definitely has a larger sensor too, which will make those 16Mpix be worth it.

And the screen is a lot better too (Nokia could manage only 360x640, this thing has twice that much).

It's true that the 808 still does the job of a PHONE slightly better, but if you really love cameras and care about super-resolution screens, you should go grab this thing :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 15:47
  • 3c18
  • R

> In reply to Gisam @ 2012-09-01 08:29 from UGnu - click to readYup. If can sms and call for sure i wil buy

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 15:28
  • IVBH
  • R

Nice one i hope its much much better than nokia shit called pure view 808 good going samsung :D

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 14:51
  • Hkqj
  • U

No for sure, Nokia 808 PureView is much better and wait for Nokia Lumia phones that will also have PureView, just wait until 5th September, trust me, you won't be disappointed!

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 14:37
  • snRF
  • R

What now, Camera
With a Phone integrated in it...Where is This World Heading......!!...!!!...!!!!!....!!.!

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 13:57
  • PUha
  • C

Nokia 808 Pureview Is Much Better Than Samsung Galaxy Camera Because It Has 16 MP Than Pureview That Has 41 MP. But The Design Of This Is Better Than Pureview. Am I Right??? :))

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 13:51
  • wY5C
  • U

Please put on the average price/cost of these products so that the interested persons can purchase !!

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 13:01
  • fmGG
  • C

does this support simcard?

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 10:44
  • K7cC
  • Q

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readnokia 808 e z so so better to this handset

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 10:27
  • ut@V
  • H

> In reply to mukesh @ 2012-08-31 19:14 from vGc6 - click to readthis is not a phone it is android camera

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 09:18
  • sGC{
  • R

no support for call/sms.. so sad..

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 08:29
  • UGnu
  • R

> In reply to sriabhi @ 2012-09-01 06:47 from XukX - click to readThis camera is not using Carl Zeiss.
I have tried a few models and don't find Samsung lens impress me.
But Nokia PV lens is Carl Zeiss and it really can tell the differences.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 08:13
  • u{Ea
  • R

Device with no support for GSM voice communication. so dont call this a phone. this is a digital camera with android OS. which one better pureview or this? well it depend on what you are looking, a phone with outdated OS and little apps but with a great camera or a digital camera with the ability of a mini tablet or pmp, i will choose nokia 920 it has pureview camera grade plus winphone 8, a win win solution :D

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 07:38
  • y$6C
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 19:51 from PS69 - click to readexcuse me sir,
nokia 808 pureview is uncompareable with samsug galaxy camera.
pureview has only camer,
but galaxy has all bet specs..
pureview dnt have any focusing lens.

moreover jellybean, not useles old symbian...
here is android,
leading in os market.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 06:47
  • XukX
  • R

so, we can't use it to call somebody..?? that's suck....

But it kinda looks good though, when it comes out, i'll probably gonna buy it XD

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 03:46
  • 61rV
  • Q

Samsung fanboys are very strange... When Nokia 808 PV came out they were saying that it has a great camera but lacks some smartphone capabilities and is big and heavy and now they say that this is a great device even thought it has twice the weight and size of PV and doesn't come close to it in camera specs... I still don't understand why should a camera have a quad core and android when you still have to carry a smartphone with you...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 01:07
  • 0ZJM
  • U

no xenon flash..
trash camera olldddeeessstt...camera ever...hhaaa

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 22:27
  • KxcV
  • U

> In reply to ahmedjan87 @ 2012-08-31 21:07 from JATp - click to readBut it would be... Given that fact it has an optical zoom vs a digital zoom... Regardless of MP that fact alone beats the Nokia 808 Pureview

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 22:15
  • nE9q
  • R

no 2G??? why samsung whyyyy......???

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 21:36
  • 6%u}
  • U

Sort by:
Total of 838 user reviews and opinions for Samsung Galaxy Camera GC100.