Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
4.4%
Total hits:
10821757

Voting results

Design
7.7
Features
7.7
Performance
7.6
Votes:
256

Sort by:

Why Droid Razr is better than the Galaxy S2: 1.
First of all the Ultra thin 7.1mm vs Galaxy S2
8.5mm
2. Droid
RAZR got qHD resolution (that is, 540 x 960
pixels) as against Galaxy S2’s 480 x 800 pixels resolution, so we think Droid RAZR beats S2
when it comes to display and anyway,
‘Advanced’ seems more advanced to me than
‘Plus’ variant of Super AMOLED display. 3. Droid
Razr Video call HD 720p vs Galaxy S2
VGA. 4. Droid Rarz Size 480 x 800 pixels, 4.3 inches
(~217 ppi pixel
density) 540 x 960 pixels, 4.3 inches (~256 ppi
pixel
density) vs Galaxy S2 480 x 800 pixels, 4.3 inches
(~217 ppi pixel density) 4. Droid Razr Build quality: I think Droid
RAZR beats it. The Droid RAZR’s back got Kevlar
coating around the edges and in between lies the
fabric material, much cooler than plastic — and
without making it prone to normal fall-down. Not
only back, but Droid RAZR’s front and overall body design is pretty cool, and refreshing too. 5.
Well, Droid RAZR got more powerful 1780 mAh
battery than S2’s 1650 mAh and got more
storage space, at 32Gb, than 16GB. RAM is equal
at 1GB in both devices. 6. Better Design Droid Good Looking 7. Droid Razr LaptopDock, HD Multi Media Dock

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-23 00:30
  • fj1x
  • U

> In reply to anasef2020 @ 2011-10-22 16:15 from Lb1P - click to readPlease dont be so disappointed as the picture quality (atleast unless you want to super enlarge your photograph for some reason) is not entirely based on number of pixels, its the internal CCD, optics and algorithm which really decides the quality. Almost similar goes for video recording.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-23 00:27
  • pK7f
  • R

This is just to big shit for a phone man... All screens above 4" is too much

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-23 00:05
  • g8$i
  • C

> In reply to Rauf @ 2011-10-22 12:14 from s3%p - click to readHow can you tell the camera is not good? Improving megapixels on a cell phone only makes sense until a given point. How many times you printed a cell phone picture on a 8x10 paper? I'm guessing never, since for any such quality you're probably using an DSLR like I do.

If they are improving technology by increasing the breathing room of the sensor without pushing it too far in that ridiculous megapixel race, improving noise and low light performance, I'm all for it.

IMHO, we reached a point in cell phone cameras where we need more quality, not megapixels.

However, if you know that it's the same sensor of previous phones, then I agree with you. :-)

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 23:41
  • 8Uge
  • R

5 megapixels?
Welcome to the stone age.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 21:38
  • snTj
  • R

gpu suxs.... espected something better...

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 17:20
  • n0er
  • U

The Camera 5MP. I Can't believe that. The Camera Should be 8mp , I think there is Something wrong

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 16:15
  • Lb1P
  • C

WOW.... I Love This HandHeld...
Bigger Screen.. great CPU.. high Resolution...
but the Price Make Me Down... :'(

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 15:54
  • wrfx
  • U

To build a phone in todays day and time with all the multi media out there without an sd card slot is beyond stupid.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 15:47
  • kUAj
  • C

Great phone and awesome features and concerning the price i'm it's cheaper than iphone 4S

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 15:45
  • nTpT
  • U

Yeah I agree, but why use OMAP chipset instead of EXYNOS chipset?

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 15:28
  • PxxE
  • U

handling this phone will be troublesome. You will need two hands. Inconvenient.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 15:23
  • vxjF
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-10-21 19:20 from nCiG - click to readHi guy, pick up....
316 ppi pixels density is quite good.
gs3 may not come up before Nokia Appolo arrival.


  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 13:48
  • 7qy0
  • R

Samsung seem to be running with the bulls! They are finally snapping necks and cashing cheques! Well done!

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 12:50
  • Ui05
  • R

Next Generation of Google Nexus

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 12:28
  • IEVS
  • Q

> In reply to Droid Terminator @ 2011-10-21 16:52 from fj1x - click to readI totally agree with you!! plus Motorola is AMERICAN company!!! and samsung is South Korean! NOW WHAT???????
GOD BLESS USA!!!

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 12:27
  • 3Seu
  • R

Its a great phone thats for sure but the camera and the battery could've been much better , I'm disappointed and I'm waiting for the Galaxy S2 HD LTE hoping its battery will be better.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 12:14
  • s3%p
  • C

Is this phone costlier than the sgsII...????........also tell is this phone greater than 'the greatest smartphone ever' a.k.a sgsII..????

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 11:29
  • fCW}
  • R

I m having a sgsII....(no need to talk,it is a great phone).....but need to know that is the galaxy nexus is worth a buy.??...(obviously ,after selling sgsII.:-(..:-(...)...please do suggest.......

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 11:22
  • fCW}
  • R

> In reply to Mobilemaster @ 2011-10-21 18:54 from La5N - click to readyes, Samsung is a great company!!! Does't matter that Google bought Moto, I will be a Samsung fan anyway.

  • Reply
  • 2011-10-22 11:17
  • 3E80
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 3546 user reviews and opinions for Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250.