This article is outdated. We have already published a full review.
Synthetic benchmarks
The Samsung Galaxy Note II is powered by a homebrewed chipset - Exynos 4412 Quad. It has a quartet of Cortex-A9 cores clocked at 1.6GHz along with 2GB of RAM and Mali-400 GPU. We'll hold off on the analysis of the benchmarks, we think the results speak for themselves.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy Note II 305
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 330
Samsung Galaxy S III 344
LG Optimus 4X HD 350
Meizu MX 4-core 362
Linpack
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note II 214.3
Meizu MX 4-core 189.1
Samsung Galaxy S III 177.1
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 160.9
LG Optimus 4X HD 141.5
AnTuTu
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note II 13562
Meizu MX 4-core 11820
LG Optimus 4X HD 11735
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 11633
Samsung Galaxy S III 10767
Quadrant
Higher is better
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 5952
Samsung Galaxy S III 5365
Meizu MX 4-core 5170
Samsung Galaxy Note II 5121
LG Optimus 4X HD 4814
A quick note about the GPU benchmarks - all phones here besides the Meizu have a 720p screen, while MX 4-core has a qHD screen.
NenaMark 2
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note II 59.2
Samsung Galaxy S III 58.8
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 56.6
Meizu MX 4-core 54.1
LG Optimus 4X HD 52.3
GLBenchmark 2.1 Pro (offscreen)
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note II 144
Samsung Galaxy S III 127
Meizu MX 4-core 123
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 91
LG Optimus 4X HD 76
GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt (offscreen)
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note II 105
Samsung Galaxy S III 103
Meizu MX 4-core 80
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 64
LG Optimus 4X HD 61
The benchmarks on the Galaxy Note II were run in the native browser in Android Jelly Bean - it's blazing fast! The others were run with Chrome on Ice Cream Sandwich, which is faster than the stock ICS browser.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up