Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.5
- Features
-
6.5
- Performance
-
6.5
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Fair is fair, it's better than the original galaxy mini, but just when talking about the processor, it's much faster, but with the same screen resolution &160mb of internal memory it's not a big different between the two minis, the galaxy ace is much better choice with its better camera ,anti scratch larger screen with a better resolution, longer battery life, or if you need a small phone like mini simply choosing the new galaxy mini 2 is much better choice too
- Reply
- 2012-02-18 23:27
- fX8{
- U
- Gopal
- Report
- 0
Very bad phone....
Low bettery backup....
Third class display resolution....
Bad camera....
No adofe flash player support....
pls don't buy it....
- Reply
- 2012-02-18 09:20
- U@j@
- H
- Buhari
- Report
- 0
The battery sucks on this phone. Hardly lasts for 1.5 days with normal usage.
- Reply
- 2012-02-17 17:24
- jmKH
- H
- Raghu
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Ajm @ 2012-02-16 15:37 from t1$E - click to readTnx dude.....
I also felt dat let me go for ace plus it ll come within 2mnths.....
- Reply
- 2012-02-17 07:17
- 7wDV
- R
- Ajm
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Raghu @ 2012-02-15 12:19 from uuh0 - click to readHey bro try out pop plus the updated version.this is of same price range.best budget phone.if you can save 4000 more you can opt for galaxy ace which is better
- Reply
- 2012-02-16 15:37
- t1$E
- R
- Raghu
- Report
- 0
Hi... is this phone(pop plus) available in indian market??? its processor is 832Mhz is this true???
am in confusion status between pop and pop-plus
- Reply
- 2012-02-15 12:19
- uuh0
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to old_mini @ 2012-02-14 16:38 from UD$i - click to readcheck kimstore :)
- Reply
- 2012-02-15 01:05
- t7Rm
- R
- Webstah
- Report
- 0
oohhh.....
nothin new... .except the processor...
SAMSUNG PLZZ IMPROVE ITS BATTERY LIFE. ...
PLZZZ
;-)
- Reply
- 2012-02-14 17:15
- 7wBn
- U
- bad
- Report
- 0
noting new excpt increasd processor spd. Atleast they shud incld adobe flash...:-(
- Reply
- 2012-02-14 15:29
- Xu9R
- C
- manish sahni
- Report
- 0
better than previous with 2.3.6 and 832 mhz proccessor
- Reply
- 2012-02-14 14:06
- KA4f
- H


Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up