Samsung i400 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.1
- Features
-
7.8
- Performance
-
7.9
- Kal
- Report
I wonder why there is no report on S60 Madrid expo on GSMarena. A single update from Nokia makes news, how come this one missed out?
And folks I dont understand why some of you cry out when a phone is not 3G. Not everyone needs 3G. They have already announced i520 for that.
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 12:18
- PxqT
- U
- Jack
- Report
No 3G ( still OK for me), no FM-radio, no flash.
Looks like budget phone with basic functions and S60 inside. Almost the same phone like i520, but with reduced functions. Nothing interesting. I was expecting more from Samsung...
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 10:52
- iKCq
- U
- DaveTheTekkie
- Report
Great... yet another S60 phone... looks like Samsung are going down the toilet the way of the Nokia... So much for reliability.
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 10:12
- pYFe
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Similar features to the W580, but I like the W580 better. Pretty decent specs though.
But Samsung sliders look the same! But this one looks a bit more low end than other ones.
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 08:55
- U2TL
- U
- babak
- Report
the style is really nice but the problem is that it is not a 3G phone
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 07:26
- n}vy
- U
- rai
- Report
good thing though is that the OS dont hang unlike Nokia's....just misses out some things.
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 06:30
- bedC
- U
- rai
- Report
samsung just misses things like 3g, fm radio, etc. sad their foens are so nice...
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 06:29
- bedC
- U
- Vito
- Report
Sweet looking phone, nice to see more S60 on Samsungs! But missing FM, 3G, Wi-Fi, 3.5 mm audio jack (mind you its got A2DP)...
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 04:45
- QSdm
- U
- SeF
- Report
sad thing because gsmarena didn't make any news about this phone. isn't it worth to be reported? i remember 6120 and 8800 gold reported but why this one isn't reported?
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 03:51
- whB6
- U
- blq
- Report
lack of radio, macro mode, autofocus.... but, Samsung still in the 2nd place, after Nokia, far far behind SE & Motorola. Good job, make progrees, do not CLONE the phones like two last one's
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 01:23
- mMIR
- U
- son
- Report
this thing look hott i might just get that when it come out it need a better cam though cuz 2 mps aint good
- Reply
- 2007-04-26 00:50
- 49m7
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed