Samsung i400 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
245830

Voting results

Design
8.1
Features
7.8
Performance
7.9
Votes:
613

I wonder why there is no report on S60 Madrid expo on GSMarena. A single update from Nokia makes news, how come this one missed out?
And folks I dont understand why some of you cry out when a phone is not 3G. Not everyone needs 3G. They have already announced i520 for that.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 12:18
  • PxqT
  • U

No 3G ( still OK for me), no FM-radio, no flash.
Looks like budget phone with basic functions and S60 inside. Almost the same phone like i520, but with reduced functions. Nothing interesting. I was expecting more from Samsung...

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 10:52
  • iKCq
  • U

Great... yet another S60 phone... looks like Samsung are going down the toilet the way of the Nokia... So much for reliability.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 10:12
  • pYFe
  • U

What can this phone actually do?

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 09:18
  • m5Hg
  • U

Similar features to the W580, but I like the W580 better. Pretty decent specs though.

But Samsung sliders look the same! But this one looks a bit more low end than other ones.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 08:55
  • U2TL
  • U

the style is really nice but the problem is that it is not a 3G phone

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 07:26
  • n}vy
  • U

good thing though is that the OS dont hang unlike Nokia's....just misses out some things.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 06:30
  • bedC
  • U

samsung just misses things like 3g, fm radio, etc. sad their foens are so nice...

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 06:29
  • bedC
  • U

just another the same old boring Samsung

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 04:57
  • PFgN
  • U

Damn this phone is ugly.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 04:54
  • jhuZ
  • U

Sweet looking phone, nice to see more S60 on Samsungs! But missing FM, 3G, Wi-Fi, 3.5 mm audio jack (mind you its got A2DP)...

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 04:45
  • QSdm
  • U

oooooh this phone looks sooooo cuuuuute!!! ;D

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 04:15
  • PjCY
  • U

sad thing because gsmarena didn't make any news about this phone. isn't it worth to be reported? i remember 6120 and 8800 gold reported but why this one isn't reported?

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 03:51
  • whB6
  • U

june.avali~?

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 03:42
  • RBVF
  • U

it looks ok....

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 03:22
  • 4$7M
  • U

Nice Looking phone,but still 2mp Cam!?

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 02:10
  • kgWq
  • U

lack of radio, macro mode, autofocus.... but, Samsung still in the 2nd place, after Nokia, far far behind SE & Motorola. Good job, make progrees, do not CLONE the phones like two last one's

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 01:23
  • mMIR
  • U

this thing look hott i might just get that when it come out it need a better cam though cuz 2 mps aint good

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 00:50
  • 49m7
  • U

the phone is good as it has os software like nokia but it should have a 3.2 mpix cam he design is gr8 hope samsung releases some 5 mpix phones soon

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 00:49
  • PFIx
  • U

Samsung need an s60 with a 3.2 camera. By the time the i520 and i400 release they will be old.

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-26 00:42
  • jmVY
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.