Samsung I5800 Galaxy 3 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
0.3%
Total hits:
3598050

Voting results

Design
6.8
Features
7.0
Performance
6.9
Votes:
49

Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-07-04 10:47 from 2SM4 - click to readThat price is WITH Contract!

What are the true values for RAM and ROM?

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-05 18:18
  • i5Mx
  • R

what is the microprocessor speed??????

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-05 09:16
  • utPf
  • Q

aside from the resolution, which is a real bummer, the minor improvements from spica based on the specs and preview are camera features, proximity sensor, multi-touch input method, radio component, and swype keyboard. i think it will all boil down to pricing. i'm still unsure whether to go buy spica or wait for galaxy 3, but i'm hoping samsung would rethink the resolution on galaxy 3 and with only minor improvements from spica price galaxy 3 close to spica's.

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-05 04:04
  • tWiH
  • C

This phone costs 260 without contract in Portugal.

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-05 02:02
  • mtdJ
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-07-03 23:29 from nwd6 - click to readActually, the Spica costs about 215 Euro now.

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-04 10:47
  • 2SM4
  • R

The Spica Costs around 280 without contract and the I5800 will cost around 250, here in Europe!

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-03 23:29
  • nwd6
  • U

Is this phone support live wallpaper ?

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-30 09:12
  • uExS
  • Q

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-06-25 11:34 from vGkx - click to readThe picture is the Galaxy Apollo, a slightly modified version of the i5800.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-26 12:23
  • 2SNb
  • R

Looks just slightly inferior to I5700. That makes me wonder - I wish they come up with a new-gen Spica that would be actually upgraded and still cheap.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 22:53
  • S1MB
  • U

I think that the picture that they have here is wrong.Other sites have a different picture

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 11:34
  • vGkx
  • U

Is the resolution any good? I had a guy who told me that most of the android apps won't be working on the phone because of the resolution

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 11:33
  • vGkx
  • U

> In reply to Gsmmember @ 2010-06-19 16:59 from 2SMd - click to readI think u r wrong Rs.31k price is Galaxy S not i5800
They Both have different specifications.And i5700 Priced in india around Rs.12000.
Thanks

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 10:33
  • vbxc
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-06-24 11:05 from i2qa - click to readyeah!!!
another guy who thinks apple can end world hunger!!!

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 04:00
  • 2SRy
  • R

It may be lessthan Rs.12000

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 02:58
  • uWt1
  • C

This phone looks good, However why is there no itunes support? Apple make quality applications and i feel not having itunes will limit the content. And in turn will spell the end of this phone and sumsung as a company.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-24 11:05
  • i2qa
  • U

> In reply to Amar @ 2010-06-23 08:03 from vGEc - click to readSir,
I am sorry ,I got the model number wrongly.
BTW,is SE X8 is available in India?Called up Univercell and Mobilestore,but they were not having pricing information.
Regards,
KRP

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-23 09:50
  • PSL6
  • R

> In reply to Amar @ 2010-06-23 08:03 from vGEc - click to readSir,
Are you mentioning about the SE Xperia or SE XPeria Mini.If it is Mini ,I don't think the HW features are anyway comparable?
Regards,
KRP

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-23 09:22
  • PSL6
  • R

SE's Xperia X8 is with same feaures with better resolution and in just Rs 11000. It come with Android 1.6 but will be upgradable to 2.1 as per company. So who will bye this i5800 phone for 15000+

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-23 08:03
  • vGEc
  • Q

I heard it will be overpriced.. just go for the wave guys..

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-22 12:42
  • tWiC
  • U

Is the screen resolution really 400x240 on a 3.2" screen?

It's gonna look pixelize :(

Down grade from the i5700 spica.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-21 16:51
  • t7Vv
  • C
Sort by:
Total of 3229 user reviews and opinions for Samsung I5800 Galaxy 3.