Samsung I5800 Galaxy 3 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
0.4%
Total hits:
3560826

Voting results

Design
6.8
Features
7.0
Performance
6.8
Votes:
48

Sort by:

Looks just slightly inferior to I5700. That makes me wonder - I wish they come up with a new-gen Spica that would be actually upgraded and still cheap.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 22:53
  • S1MB
  • U

I think that the picture that they have here is wrong.Other sites have a different picture

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 11:34
  • vGkx
  • U

Is the resolution any good? I had a guy who told me that most of the android apps won't be working on the phone because of the resolution

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 11:33
  • vGkx
  • U

> In reply to Gsmmember @ 2010-06-19 16:59 from 2SMd - click to readI think u r wrong Rs.31k price is Galaxy S not i5800
They Both have different specifications.And i5700 Priced in india around Rs.12000.
Thanks

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 10:33
  • vbxc
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-06-24 11:05 from i2qa - click to readyeah!!!
another guy who thinks apple can end world hunger!!!

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 04:00
  • 2SRy
  • R

It may be lessthan Rs.12000

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-25 02:58
  • uWt1
  • C

This phone looks good, However why is there no itunes support? Apple make quality applications and i feel not having itunes will limit the content. And in turn will spell the end of this phone and sumsung as a company.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-24 11:05
  • i2qa
  • U

> In reply to Amar @ 2010-06-23 08:03 from vGEc - click to readSir,
I am sorry ,I got the model number wrongly.
BTW,is SE X8 is available in India?Called up Univercell and Mobilestore,but they were not having pricing information.
Regards,
KRP

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-23 09:50
  • PSL6
  • R

> In reply to Amar @ 2010-06-23 08:03 from vGEc - click to readSir,
Are you mentioning about the SE Xperia or SE XPeria Mini.If it is Mini ,I don't think the HW features are anyway comparable?
Regards,
KRP

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-23 09:22
  • PSL6
  • R

SE's Xperia X8 is with same feaures with better resolution and in just Rs 11000. It come with Android 1.6 but will be upgradable to 2.1 as per company. So who will bye this i5800 phone for 15000+

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-23 08:03
  • vGEc
  • Q

I heard it will be overpriced.. just go for the wave guys..

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-22 12:42
  • tWiC
  • U

Is the screen resolution really 400x240 on a 3.2" screen?

It's gonna look pixelize :(

Down grade from the i5700 spica.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-21 16:51
  • t7Vv
  • C

240x400???samsung you can do better..

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-21 03:51
  • wrr0
  • U

I did not like the design of the back cover. Would have been better to keep it simple.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-20 19:37
  • 2Z12
  • U

Dont think the price should be above 13k. Its just a brother of i5700. Does anyone know the current price of i5700. I think If its not priced correctly its gonna be a failure.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-20 11:06
  • KFND
  • C

> In reply to AFA @ 2010-06-17 00:04 from uWxN - click to readThat site seems to have a lot of false data on the i5800. It would never sell for Rs 31k. It's got hardware comparable to spica, and is supposed to be a mid ranged smart phone. It shouldn't sell for anywhere over 12k.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-19 16:59
  • 2SMd
  • R

> In reply to AFA @ 2010-06-17 00:04 from uWxN - click to readThat site seems to have a lot of false data on the i5800. It would never sell for Rs 31k. It's got hardware comparable to spica, and is supposed to be a mid ranged smart phone. It shouldn't sell for anywhere over 12k.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-19 16:58
  • 2SMd
  • R

Wait, I don't see the problem with the screen. If the pixels are bigger, doesn't it mean it's better and larger? Heaps of phones have a smaller screen then this.

Like, the HTC wildfire has a smaller screen and no one complains about that. http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_wildfire-3337.php

And if the larger the pixels are the smaller the screen is, then the Samsung Galaxy S would have a small screen.

Someone explain what's wrong? :S

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-19 07:06
  • vuRe
  • U

> In reply to AFA @ 2010-06-17 00:04 from uWxN - click to readIt also says it has a DUAL LED flash, which it obviously doesn't have. So it's hard to say that that preview is relevant at all.

We can only help that good guys at Samsung come up with an idea to put a better screen in.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-18 18:23
  • njED
  • R

> In reply to danz @ 2010-06-15 16:52 from sEBP - click to readSeriously, people still compare {put any cheap touch phone here} with nokia 5800 and said it's better just because it's NOKIA.

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-17 22:11
  • PGgs
  • R
Sort by:
Total of 3221 user reviews and opinions for Samsung I5800 Galaxy 3.