Samsung i600 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
8.3
- Performance
-
8.2
- Votes:
- 2913
- Hits:
- 933212
- sean
- Report
isn't this same as blackjack on cingular?
I'm suprised that major carrier brought the phone before it was even released to the market!!
now only if Cingular actually worked on their network services all would be good
- Reply
- 2006-12-06 05:46
- x7x%
- U
- nitesmoke
- Report
been using the i607 blackjack for cingular which is the same model with no wifi and or video calling. call quality has been very good so far. few dropped calls so far. sadly im in LA so there is no hsdpa over here so i cant comment on internet speed. edge is slow as heck unfortunately. processor is slow too. also cant compose word docs. on the positives its a very sleek phone and does a good job turning heads. call volume is solid. browser is a bit annoying because you have to delete every letter to type in a new address. key pad is good. love the track wheel and it runs ok with the sd card. i still hate the pull email. i like this phone but ill prolly go back to my blackberry. not the greatest phone in my opinion.
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 22:05
- 4fvu
- U
- Bijaad
- Report
Is it possible to add a mp3-file for when you receive a SMS?
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 20:04
- mFMH
- U
- Rui
- Report
Just about perfect. Just hope the batterie life is improved over the Blackjack.
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 20:04
- 4iE1
- U
- arun
- Report
Looks good but will it go on to beat imate models like jas jam. Touchscreen will be missed.
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 17:54
- M{3N
- U
- PauloP
- Report
Because of short battery life in i320 I would appreciate if someone can tell how is the i600 battery life.
Thks
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 11:15
- N9VH
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
unfortunately guys. this one got no touchscreen. it cannot edit word or excel. it can only edit .txt files. i got a samsung i320, which is its younger brother. short battery life, easy one handed use, beautiful and really bright screen, very limited functions. it is all windows os to blame! not samsung's fault.
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 02:45
- PZT7
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
yup, must agree, sometime touchscreen is more annoying, just compare between tablet pc and laptop for example, touchscreen took a lot of good feature away
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 01:47
- 4$MV
- U
- Khalid Dubai
- Report
I think this is the perfect model, I tried the i320 and it was good but lacking WLAN and 3G and now these features are available in this model. and It is PERFECT because there is no touch screen, try the Nokia E61i and see how perfect the phone will be with windows mobile 5 OS without touch screen. It is just amazing and i am sure about buying this one. I dont' care about the battery life. I use Samsung X820 and very comfortable about it.
- Reply
- 2006-12-05 00:47
- SkEn
- U
- ROMANCEMAN
- Report
well i'm glad to be the first one who write some thing about this new piece of art
well i have i-mate now but i love samsung and i was waiting for a mobile working on windows mobile, i hate nokia so i was waiting for this
thank you samsung
and for sure i will buy it no doupt
- Reply
- 2006-12-04 20:44
- T0qa
- U
- vincent hyderabad i
- Report
low power processor ,no fm radio no sleek looks are the great disadvantages to this phone
- Reply
- 2006-12-04 20:12
- Uqsf
- U
- Aamir
- Report
No touch screen?! hmm. I'll stick to P990i. Samsung arent very good with PDA's.
- Reply
- 2006-12-04 19:49
- iLNx
- U
- lucienium
- Report
bigger display = bigger phone and more batt consumption...
No this isn't blackjack. this is blackjack + WiFi + secondary cam for video call - 850mhz band :-)... ergo, this is made for asia and europe
- Reply
- 2006-12-04 18:05
- MZ$B
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Has this phone got a touch screen? It is running on WM5 or the Smartphone edition?
- Reply
- 2006-12-04 17:02
- TR}f
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed