i have expected Galaxy S3 has more reliabilities . as we can see just screen size and resolution and camera has improved .
it's so annoying why Samsung didn't used at least 5" LCD and full HD resolution and a quad core chipset for Galaxy SIII .
big missing options are in camera :
1: 3D sweep panorama
2: Simultaneous HD video and image recording
3: it could have 3D video and image recording in 720p resolution
i have disappointed :|
Funny how a lot of people are bagging out the Galaxy s 3, saying it's only dual core and there are other phoens using quad-core, well to all those people, keep in mind there are no applications available that use quad-core, and only minimal available to use a dual-core. People complain about the battery life, well if you think it finished fast using a dual-core, have fun using a quad-core where the battery will onnly last a few hours. If you people don't know naything about the phone itself and how it runs, except a few specs, then you shouldn't be talking!
Pitty them specs are all wrong since it will have a 4.8inch 1080p screen and a 1.5 quad core cpu and gpu.
No Xenon flash :S :S :S so why should i swap my S2 with this ??? nothing new
Anonymous, 17 Mar 2012crapy fons...colours r so unnatural,greenish touch in every colour,built quality isnt up to th... moreYeah? Then why wernt ur 'better' phones from sony nt even in the nominee list of bst smartfones for 2011?
Kammy, 27 Feb 2012As soon as it is released i gonna say bye bye to my galaxy note ... are you nuts???note is an awesum device..i don't think this 1 is going to b as gud..stick on to note
I think that sgs 3 should be with quad core CPU,because of competition with tegra 3 phones.
If the battery is the same as SII, then the phone will have only talk time of 4 hrs. I think the Samsung should think of increasing the battery performance.
ritesh, 17 Mar 2012i am living now in europe and price of SIII is 863 dollers that my selling price in europeSince the SGS III won't be on sale for at least 6-9 months, there is NO chance that you have a price for them.
It would be better with a better cpu,like a 1.5GH Quad core
but it is steel my wish,my love
i am living now in europe and price of SIII is 863 dollers that my selling price in europe
crapy fons...colours r so unnatural,greenish touch in every colour,built quality isnt up to the mark,this isnt a laptop,so 2 gb ram dsnt really matters,512 mb ram is more than enough for a smartfon,i guess samsung should work on th quality of screen and built rather than expanding ram and clock speed,afterall this is a fon,sony's xperia arc,s,neo,ray...these all r as fast as galaxy,but got better camera,sound,and built and looks,so to choose this??