Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Sort by:

> In reply to [deleted post]your words did really amount to nothing.. amusing though..
hard to be critical when your bias from the beginning huh
take it easy :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 18:19
  • vMew
  • R

> In reply to Mr.Death @ 2012-09-03 17:00 from v{Us - click to readThe battery can make u alive, again.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 18:13
  • IWQd
  • R

> In reply to [deleted post]suing a company for millions over things as trivial as a phones form factor is a tad bit different than making someone were there tee shirts right?? just a little.. thank you

also i was never ever ever claiming its tech specs, performance yes.. so before you start running your mouth get your facts straight cool??
and i will quote you now 'when SGS3 launched' yes launched.. critical word there is launched the phones and again pay attention ok.. the phones everyone saying are the s3 killers are still yet to be LAUNCHED .. get it??
next.. as far as i see it i dont see anything better.. possibly better maybe.. would like to ask you though and it is a little hard because again we are only making assumptions... if the difference in 'speeds' between a dual core and a quad core are so close in real terms or day to day life are non existent personally id rather the quad for better multi tasking, better gaming and again a more efficient cpu wouldnt you?
okkkkk finally lol...will quote you again '
Enough with the hypocrisy Samsung fanboys, try and be respectable like your Sony and HTC Android fans' pretty sure all them sony fans have been the ones yelling sony is king, beats the s3, etc etc from the roof tops in samsung forums.. i mean it would make sense to wait til the phone is actually 'launched' right???
youve got nothing :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 18:08
  • vMew
  • R

How is this Phone????.. Any anyone say about it's battery??? ..... Can it be upgraded to Soya Bean OS????

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 17:00
  • v{Us
  • C

> In reply to [deleted post]when ? :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 16:01
  • vMew
  • H

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-03 15:00 from RIIx - click to readbtw even if these phones do out perform the s3 ... 'shock... horror!!'... these are new release mobiles your talking about, the s3 was released over 6mths ago... and thats a big IF.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 15:30
  • vMew
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-03 15:00 from RIIx - click to readlol u guys just cling on to whatever you can huh.. and in real life terms the difference in benchmarks is non existent..again the quad wont necessarily make it quicker but more powerful.. quality and how a phone is brought together and how the technology is implied is what matters which unless youve used the phone or seen reviews or at least know someone whos used the phone your making assumptions :)
again specs on paper are completely different to how the phone actually performs.. they are a budget mobile manufacturer for a reason.
and as far as the 'innovative ideas' go.. again trying to cling on where possible to even resorting to blogs on how samsung forced people to wear there brands is kinda funny..
and innovation.. we all know what apple did was a load of rubbish go read any of the news about it on gsma.. comments from even apple supporters saying it is total non-sense... if you want dirty tactics.. look no further than apple :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 15:27
  • vMew
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-03 15:03 from RIIx - click to readagain who cares..

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 15:14
  • vMew
  • R

Story has made it to Gizmodo. What a wonderful company Samsung is... NOT! Lol

http://m.gizmodo.com/5939986/h...s-in-germany

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 15:04
  • RIIx
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-03 03:18 from vMew - click to readNot just wear tees. They told unbiased bloggers to wear Samsung t-shirts and man Samsung booths. WTF? Lol Samsung are truly shameless.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 15:03
  • RIIx
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-03 13:34 from vMew - click to readEven the chinese Xiaomi phone matches or bests the SGS3 in benchmark tests. What is certainly clear is that the unmatched dominance the Galaxy series once had is no longer there as rivals now either match or outgun Samsung, while Samsung struggles with the concept of designing something by themselves for a change.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 15:00
  • RIIx
  • R

the phone is nice i would love 2 have

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 14:58
  • fwjK
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-03 13:34 from vMew - click to readsony have the best to offer

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 13:36
  • MDVw
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-03 12:55 from RIIx - click to readreally better cam? didnt think the xperia t was released yet??oh and 'blasting the s3' in real life the difference will be zero but start getting into some high demand apps and gaming and the quad will shine.
thing is having a quad core wont necessarily make it quicker.. but more powerful.. absolutely
btw if i know sony i wouldnt get your hopes up to high just yet.. but we will see :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 13:34
  • vMew
  • U

> In reply to Dee @ 2012-09-03 05:18 from PWng - click to readYou're welcom :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 13:09
  • Hxi2
  • U

Lumia 920 comes with PureView technology. Samsung now unable to innovate (cannot copycat) will find the coming months hard. The results are already evident. Xperia TX blasting it in benchmarks with way better camera, and Lumia 920 with ultimate camera and design.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 12:55
  • RIIx
  • U

> In reply to [deleted post]Thank you vikass17. Any help is alway welcome. I don't have that many Apps as I knew the outcome of it.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 12:07
  • v}7V
  • R

Sorry...Its iSJ5..
Go back martian.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 11:35
  • fCLp
  • U

Hey people ithink we have an alien ((is5j) among us humans.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-03 11:32
  • fCLp
  • U
Sort by:
Total of 23009 user reviews and opinions for Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III.