- Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Galaxy S III: Advanced fence-sitting
- Google Nexus 4 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: Fan favorites
- LG Optimus G v Samsung Galaxy S III: Beast wars
- Apple iPhone 5 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: All rise
- Samsung Galaxy S III vs. Note II: Sizing up
- Samsung Galaxy S III Jelly Bean review: Bread and butter
- Quad-core shootout: Four of a kind
- Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III review: S to the third
- Specifications
- Compare
- Pictures
- 360° view
- In the news (new)
- Manual
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.8
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.3
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to ameya. @ 2012-05-04 10:58 from t1}9 - click to readLol!!! 41mp camera with a 5mp sensor! Hahahaha! Nokia indeed! Ever compared their cameras(8mp for instance) with a BB 5mp? Do that!" 41mp" indeed
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:25
- 3sE3
- R
- driftking2vortex
- Report
- 0
Everythings seems perfect in SGS3 but one things that makes me irritate that is the "PLASTIC BODY"...
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:24
- Lbt$
- H
- advice
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Sea-Breeze @ 2012-05-04 13:55 from NtjV - click to readyou are saying that android apps and games are silly which millions and millions of people who use android and apple markets are disagree with u ,but look this means u r different which is most likely a bad thing.
and if u r a camera geek and u can not understand the benefit of android apps why did u in the first place bought the s2 instead of the laggy n8.
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:22
- fwMS
- R
- skunal
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-04 13:50 from qG{G - click to readLol, there was no competitor till 4 years for iPhone
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:20
- uvht
- R
- dreaming of phone
- Report
- 0
wow many phones have come.. this one big screen but for me cant own even a phone.. just dreaming
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:20
- Kg}E
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
it looks like the iPhone 3g's. samsung ran out of ideas of more designs.
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:18
- mg5i
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to cheat @ 2012-05-04 11:16 from w7ia - click to readX one might be 1.5, but with a slower chipset. Samsung uses a company developed chipset. Plus, much more 'wow' features. Much better design even! C'mon hater!
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:17
- 3sE3
- R
- Abdool
- Report
- 0
Htc is still king of the droids. Samsung UI and camera suck. Design looks even worse
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:17
- ftKH
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Guessing max sales 5 - 6 million of S3??? unless huge price drop / offers.... Samsung you have failed on this one accept it and come up fast with something that beats my S2
Add 1) Dual SIM 2) Spen 3) Slider QWERTY 4) 3000+ Battery 5) Screen 4.8 6) Looks like S2 7) Solid build
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:14
- vGqJ
- U
- Wilfred
- Report
- 0
A great phone with a pathetic design...... Very much disappointed with the design..... Should've done better
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:14
- uux}
- U
- jordun
- Report
- 0
i hope is 1.8 quad core or design is very bad nd not 12mp
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:14
- 9Gay
- C
- Mobilemaster
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-04 13:25 from fji{ - click to readMany other phones looks like a brick. At least this has round edges. It has awesome specs, it's much better than teh One X. It can do much more. This is a fact.
To HTC fans: GET lost!!! :P
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:13
- Mve4
- R
- Scorpion
- Report
- 0
> In reply to unknown @ 2012-05-04 13:46 from 3qyZ - click to readIn your dreamssssss....
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:13
- utkL
- C
- aadhu
- Report
- 0
samsung galaxy s3 rulezzz .....nothing stands int its way
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:12
- utND
- U
- aniketgalande
- Report
- 0
> In reply to samsung fan @ 2012-05-04 13:48 from Kxuc - click to readreally the oval shape seems like bald...the good hardware should b served with nice design..
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 14:11
- XupD
- R


Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up